VAERS – Pandemic Timeline https://pandemictimeline.com Chronological Sequence of Events Sun, 29 Oct 2023 05:40:33 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 https://pandemictimeline.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Covid-150x150.ico VAERS – Pandemic Timeline https://pandemictimeline.com 32 32 Report: fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported to the VAERS. https://pandemictimeline.com/2010/09/grant-final-report-review-of-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system-vaers-determines-that-fewer-than-1-of-vaccine-adverse-events-are-reported/ Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:07 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=98 Grant Final Report: Review of Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) determines that fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Even if we assume that the COVID-19 situation has created increased awareness of VAERS, we can assume that adverse reactions are still grossly underreported. If nothing has changed, this means that statistics derived…

]]>

Grant Final Report: Review of Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) determines that fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Even if we assume that the COVID-19 situation has created increased awareness of VAERS, we can assume that adverse reactions are still grossly underreported. If nothing has changed, this means that statistics derived from VAERS can be multiplied by 100.

In addition to being grossly underreported, it appears that the data in VAERS may not be entirely up to date.  It appears that the CDC is behind in their reporting of adverse reactions.

According to Dr. David Martin, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 requires that the VAERS database be maintained accurately.  This is a statutory requirement for maintaining immunity.

The following shows how VAERS data compares with the Pfizer clinical trial data.

Page 35 of CCCA report: Roll Out Surveillance: You Don’t Find What You Don’t Look For
Left side chart is the Pfizer clinical trials. Right side chart is the passive surveillance of the general population post-rollout.

Sources:

Related:

See also, on this site:

 

 

]]>
Emergency use authorization is issued for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. https://pandemictimeline.com/2020/12/emergency-use-authorization-is-issued-for-the-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine/ Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:00:57 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=375 The study presented in the Emergency Use Authorization based its efficacy assessment on the results of PCR tests, which we now know are unreliable and prone to errors.  Page 41 includes additional data about people who actually got sick after the inoculation.  Significantly more people got sick in the test group after vaccination than in…

]]>

The study presented in the Emergency Use Authorization based its efficacy assessment on the results of PCR tests, which we now know are unreliable and prone to errors.  Page 41 includes additional data about people who actually got sick after the inoculation.  Significantly more people got sick in the test group after vaccination than in the control group.  This information was charted by Karen Kingston and is presented toward the end of this post.

Under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), when the Secretary of HHS declares that an emergency use authorization is appropriate, FDA may authorize unapproved medical products or unapproved uses of approved medical products to be used in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions caused by CBRN threat agents when certain criteria are met, including there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. — FDA statement on EAUs

In other words, if there is a viable option, an EAU should not be granted.

From page 4 of the Letter of Authorization, August 12, 2021

Effective treatment protocols using approved drugs existed prior to the first issuance of an EUA for vaccines. Doctors testified of this in the Senate.

Safety and efficacy testing is still ongoing for this product.  Details are in the Review Memorandum found in the FDA’s main page for this product.  Therefore, no advertising for this product may legally use the terms “safe and effective”.

Pfizer is required to report to VAERS any adverse reaction, whether or not is is attributed to the vaccine.

From page 8 of the Letter of Authorization, August 12, 2021

Was this reporting to VAERS done as required?

Statement about available therapies

The EUA acknowledges in the clip above that other therapies are available, but they have not been FDA approved specifically for the treatment of COVID-19.  In saying this, they are admitting that they are relying on a technicality to qualify the vaccine for the EUA.  An EUA should only be issued if there are no other options.  Other options existed, but they had not been specifically approved for COVID-19 and thus were disregarded.

How long would it have taken for the other options to have been relabeled as treatment for COVID-19?  Was it possible in the timeframe available up until this point?  Should these other options have been disregarded in this way, given the clinical results being reported by those using these other options?  Was there intent by the FDA to disregard?  What was the motivation?

Charted by Karen Kingston: This is the efficacy that is being claimed.

Note that the follow-up period in the chart above is only 7 days.  Karen Kingston found additional data in the report beyond 7 days, and the following chart shows those results.  Also note that they were using PCR tests to determine who had been infected without regard for whether the person had symptoms.

How many cycles were used in evaluating the PCR tests?  Were the same number of cycles used for both groups?

Charted by Karen Kingston: These are the results when all data is charted.

Text on page 41 from which chart of unconfirmed illness was derived

The above chart shows how many got sick as evidenced by symptoms.  More unvaccinated people in the study may have tested positive on a PCR test, but this data shows that more vaccinated people actually had symptoms of being sick.  And isn’t that really what matters?

I’m going to go out on a limb here. I am not a medical expert.

If more unvaccinated test subjects tested positive on a PCR test, but more vaccinated test subjects had symptoms, might this be early evidence of the ADE dangers of the vaccines predicted by industry experts?

Sources:

See also, on this site:

]]>
Vaccine results are coming in… https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/01/vaccine-results-are-coming-in/ Sun, 31 Jan 2021 00:00:07 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=386 The CDC keeps a database: Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The VAERS is a voluntary system. Only a fraction of actual adverse reactions are reported here. Symptom 2021 2015-2019 per year Rate increase (X Factor) Blue toe syndrome 10 0.0 INFINITE Pulmonary embolism 946 2.0 473.0 Deep vein thrombosis 740 2.8 264.3 Thrombosis 2255…

]]>

The CDC keeps a database: Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The VAERS is a voluntary system. Only a fraction of actual adverse reactions are reported here.

Screen print from Tim Truth: Distribution of VAERS Reports vs. Distribution of Vaccines

Symptom 2021 2015-2019
per year
Rate increase
(X Factor)
Blue toe syndrome 10 0.0 INFINITE
Pulmonary embolism 946 2.0 473.0
Deep vein thrombosis 740 2.8 264.3
Thrombosis 2255 9.0 250.5
Appendicitis 320 2.2 145.5
Tinnitus 5486 56.4 97.3
Cardiac arrest 210 2.8 75.0
Death 1046 18.0 58.1
Parkinson’s disease 55 1.0 55.0
Slow speech 76 1.4 54.3
Aphasia (inability to talk) 576 11.0 52.3
Fatigue 46617 915.0 50.9
Headache 57787 1246.2 46.4
Chills 43063 945.0 45.6
Pericarditis 440 9.8 44.9
Deafness 1047 23.4 44.7
Myocarditis 631 14.6 43.2
Abortion Spontaneous 811 18.0 41.3
Bell’s Palsy (search used Description field because symptom field unreliable) 975 26.6 36.6
Cough 6417 200.4 32.0
Paraesthesia 14402 488.0 29.5
Blindness 520 17.2 29.1
Dyspnea (difficulty breathing) 1101 38.8 28.4
Myalgia 18242 641.6 28.4
Dysstasia (difficulty standing) 741 26.6 27.8
Seizure 2328 86.2 27.0
Anaphylactic Reaction 857 40.8 21.0
Suicide 11 0.6 18.3
Speech disorder 502 29.2 17.2
Convulsion 39 2.4 16.3
Paralysis 1317 82.2 16.0
Swelling 32299 2250.0 14.3
Diarrhoea 14945 1252.4 11.9
Neuropathy 438 39.0 11.2
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (and checking death) 82 7.4 11.1
Insulin resistance 13 1.2 10.8
Depression 872 97.6 8.9
Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) 200 75.6 2.6

“Vaccine Truth,” pp. 44 – 46, sorted by rate of increase

Sources:

  • Video
    January 31, 2021. Must See for Yourself! Accessing Covid Vaccine Reactions from CDC VAERS Site. worldthelastbattle. Runtime: 5:45.
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/GoHs77VUrINR/.
    Video.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
    https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
  • Statistics
    VAERS COVID Vaccine Data.” OpenVAERS.
    https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data.
    Statistics.
    OpenVAERS is an aggregator of VAERS data.
  • Video
    May 15, 2021. SMOKING GUN? 193K VAERS Reports, 3.9K Death Records; 32 People Compare It To Getting Hit By A Bus. Tim Truth. Runtime: 17:02.
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ei48VrtvCZ8n/.
    Video.
  • Research Journal
    June 30, 2021. Scott Mclachlan, Magda Osman, Kudakwashe Dube, Patience Chiketero, Yvonne Choi, and Norman Fenton. Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine Death Reports from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) Database Interim: Results and Analysis.
    https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26987.26402.
    Research Journal.

    “Despite this, there were only 14% of the cases [in VAERS] for which a vaccine reaction could be ruled out as a contributing factor in their death.”  That leaves 86% of cases in which a vaccine reaction could have caused the death.
  • Video
    July 7, 2021. Tens of Thousands of COVID-19 “Vaccine” Injured in the U.S. Begging for Help. HealthImpactNews. Runtime: 3:25.
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/AlFVoU6mxdIR/.
    Video.
  • Blog
    No More Silence – Telling Our Stories.
    https://nomoresilence.world/.
    Blog.
    We want to be heard. Telling our stories, in our own words. We are a fast-growing group who have been affected in many different ways by the Covid-19 Vaccine.
  • Video
    August 18, 2021. CENSORED: COVID Vaccine Injured Who Regret Their Decisions to Get the Shot and Their Message to You. HealthImpactNews. Runtime: 8:53.
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/YgTBh0RFMudD/.
    Video.
    “Every single day, I have new symptoms.”  “I thought it was a conspiracy theory.”  “I have damage in multiple areas of my brain.  I have difficulty walking.  I can’t read.  I can barely write my own name without missing letters.”  “To all you unvaccinated people, I would like to say, ‘Stand your ground.’”
  • Video
    August 23, 2021. COVID VAXX IS CAUSING A NEW SYNDROME IN CHILDREN CALLED MIS-C [2021-08-22] – DR. BRYAN ARDIS (VIDEO). Sergeant Major. Runtime: 6:03.
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/S1xG9OSez5wf/.
    Video.
  • Video
    August 28, 2021. Daughter of Registered Nurse with a Message to All. Banned Youtube Videos. Runtime: 7:41.
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/RcGUYxYGfK0b/.
    Video.
    Daughter of an experienced Australian Aged Care Registered Nurse released a video showcasing some shocking insider facts that have been hidden away from the public.  Patients in the home where the nurse works received the Comirnaty inoculation.
  • Video
    August 25, 2021. THE SHOTS ARE KILLING PEOPLE! WE NEED TO STOP THIS! [2021-08-25] – DR. ANNE MCCLOSKEY (VIDEO). Sergeant Major. Runtime: 9:28.
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/SyTAcSOVZDfr/.
    Video.
    “This time last year, there was nothing happening.  I mean nothing.  This year, it’s different.  The hospitals are filled. …”  It is difficult to make out her exact words, but it is clear that she is saying that the COVID-19 patients are mostly double-jabbed.  Dr. Anne McCloskey has been suspended from practicing medicine as a result of this video.
  • Video
    August 13, 2021. LorettaJoy222. A Memorial For Those Who Paid the Ultimate Price For the Fake Vaccines. Runtime: 8:16.
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/eHb9eM16wnmG/.
    Video.
  • Blog PDF
    August 24, 2021. Steve Kirsch. “Vaccine Safety FAQ.” Vaccine Truth.
    http://www.skirsch.com/covid/VaccineFAQ.pdf.
    Blog, PDF.
  • Video
    September 12, 2021. Vaccine Gives The Youth Myocarditis And Death But Also Gives Older People Instant Death (12th Sept). The White Rose Ireland. Runtime: 2:14. https://www.bitchute.com/video/Lyy8NUr4oYpb/.
    Video.
  • Video
    September 16, 2021. Erbakan: Tek Gözlü Kuyruklu Çocuklar Doğdu! Beyaz Haber.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywPmw2Y3QkE.
    Video.
    Vaccinated women are beginning to give birth.  Here are some of the results.
  • Research Journal
    September 22, 2021. Sanjay R. V. Gadi, Patricia A. R. Brunker, Hanny Al-Samkari, David B. Sykes, Rebecca R. Saff, Janet Lo, Pavan Bendapudi, David E. Leaf, and Rebecca Karp Leaf. “Severe Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia Following Receipt of SARS-CoV-2 MRNA Vaccine.Transfusion.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.16672.
    Research Journal.
  • Video
    January 3, 2022. Breast Milk Turns BLUE after Woman Gets COVID Vaccine. XANDREWX.
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/PKlOZeBonjyd/.
    Video.

See also, on this site:

]]>
Vaccinated people who die within 14 days of being jabbed are counted as unvaccinated https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/03/vaccinated-people-who-die-within-14-days-of-being-jabbed-are-counted-as-unvaccinated/ Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:33 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=4780 Someone noticed the following when reviewing the August 27, 2021, report from the CDC.  The CDC published some data that had been received from Los Angeles.  The following can be found on page 3 below the spreadsheet data: * Persons were considered fully vaccinated ≥14 days after receipt of the second dose in a 2-dose…

]]>
Someone noticed the following when reviewing the August 27, 2021, report from the CDC.  The CDC published some data that had been received from Los Angeles.  The following can be found on page 3 below the spreadsheet data:

* Persons were considered fully vaccinated ≥14 days after receipt of the second dose in a 2-dose series (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines) or after 1 dose of the single-dose Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 vaccine; partially vaccinated ≥14 days after receipt of the first dose and <14 days after the second dose in a 2-dose series; and unvaccinated <14 days receipt of the first dose of a 2-dose series or 1 dose of the single-dose vaccine or if no vaccination registry data were available.

As it turns out, this had been the policy for a while.  In a March 8, 2021, press release, the CDC said:

A person is considered fully vaccinated two weeks after receiving the last required dose of vaccine.

This is a new policy.

In other words, if a person dies within 14 days of getting jabbed, they are counted as unvaccinated.  So if someone dies on the spot from getting a COVID-19 jab, they will be considered unvaccinated, according to this guideline.  This would explain why hospitals are reporting that they are full of unvaccinated COVID patients while nurses are saying that the patients are mostly vaccinated.

The 14-day policy is a major hiding of data since many who die from the jabs will die in the first week, as seen in the following graph based on VEARS Covid Vax Records.  This is like saying that people don’t die from gunshot wounds within 14 days of being shot.  If anyone told us that, we would know it was a lie.  Can you imagine some thug claiming this defense in court?

After 14 days, the rate of death among the jabbed tapers off.  According to statistician Christine Cotton as of the time of her analysis, the mean days until death from the jabs was about 22 days.  Given the shape of the graph, that would indicate a long tail for the curve.

“It couldn’t have been the bullet that killed him.
It’s been less than 14 days!”

Image by IMG2GO

A related issue is record of the jabs being missing from main medical records, according to one nurse.  Hospitals may see the patients as unvaccinated when they are fully vaccinated.

This is all confirmed in this thread:

1) Thread: ‘A little epiphany about the plannedemic’

So I have mentioned on here multiple times that my wife’s a nurse at a hospital.
Last night she worked an extra shift in the Emergency Room(not her regular department) 

2) She found out, how “they” are getting away with claiming there’s a “pandemic of the unvaccinated”
While dealing with a patient who came in exhibiting symptoms of myocarditis, a FT Emergency Room nurse conveyed some very interesting information to my wife 
3) Apparently all patients are asked whether or not they received the #CV19 vax, no matter what issue it is that brought them into the ER.
If the patient received the vax less than 14 days prior, they are recorded as “Un-Vaxxed” 
4) The story the nurses are being given, is that this is done because the vax takes 14 days to start working. The FT ER nurse my wife talked to last night has a different theory: 
5) It has been her observation that most patients coming in with what appears to be vaccine injuries are coming in within 72 hours of receiving the jab.* By recording these patients as “Un-Vaxxed” they can do a few things: 
6)
– one, they can claim those vax injuries are a result of Covid & not the shot
– two, they can bury the vaccine injury
– three, they get to claim there’s a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” 
7) It also turns out that nurses are being required to sign nondisclosure agreements, promising not to publicly discuss any procedures dealing with #CV19
My wife refused to sign this agreement, and she’s awaiting possible retaliatory response from upper mgmt. 
8) but she says that the ER nurses at her hospital are mostly very closed lipped about all of this. These nurses are in fear for their jobs and have been very effectively intimidated. 
9) We need nurses across the country to start talking about all of this openly, as I’m sure our little hospital is not the only place this is occurring.
#Orwellian 

More evidence here:

* This correlates well with the screen print “death curve” below.

Screen print from Tim Truth: Deaths by Day Since Vaccination

This change in policy also explains this graph:

Screen print from Tim Truth: Distribution of VAERS Reports vs. Distribution of Vaccines

It is possible that the CDC used information provided by Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche as their excuse to validate the 14-day rule that hides statistics contrary to their narrative, but this would be disingenuous, in my way of thinking.

How might approval of boosters change this policy?  How can we trust anything from the CDC when they are actively manipulating the data in this way?

Sources:

Related:

See also, on this site:

]]>
Dr. Peter McCullough reports that he has not noticed a difference in severity of symptoms between vaccinated and unvacinated. https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/04/dr-peter-mccullough-reports-that-he-has-not-noticed-a-difference-in-severity-of-symptoms-between-vaccinated-and-unvacinated/ Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:00:44 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=424 This is another pro-vaccine doctor coming out against THESE vaccines. Among his many qualifications, he is a practicing physician, including treating patients for COVID infection. In normal circumstances, 50 deaths reported to VAERS would result in a drug being taken off market immediately. Source:

]]>

This is another pro-vaccine doctor coming out against THESE vaccines. Among his many qualifications, he is a practicing physician, including treating patients for COVID infection. In normal circumstances, 50 deaths reported to VAERS would result in a drug being taken off market immediately.

Source:

]]>
CDC gets caught deleting deaths from VAERS database https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/04/cdc-gets-caught-deleting-deaths-from-vaers-database/ Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:00:31 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=5002 While I can’t vouch for the number in the video report, it is not far off from what Dr. Tenpenny’s whistleblower reported.  More disturbing is that any of the reports were removed at all.  If officials want to tag them in some way, fine, but they should not be removed.  These reports were made well…

]]>
While I can’t vouch for the number in the video report, it is not far off from what Dr. Tenpenny’s whistleblower reported.  More disturbing is that any of the reports were removed at all.  If officials want to tag them in some way, fine, but they should not be removed.  These reports were made well before the Pfizer approval.

How can we trust anything from the CDC when they are actively manipulating the data in this way?

Sources:

See also, on this site:

]]>
Whistleblower Testimony: 45,000 Deaths Caused by the COVID-19 Vaccines https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/07/whistleblower-testimony-45000-deaths-caused-by-the-covid-19-vaccines/ Sat, 17 Jul 2021 00:00:53 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=1592 Attorney Thomas Renz claims to have a signed affidavit from a whistleblower who says one of the US medical statistics systems shows 45,000 dead from the vaccines.  When someone signs a legal affidavit, they can go to jail if they are found to have lied, so this is a very serious claim.  If I understand…

]]>
Attorney Thomas Renz claims to have a signed affidavit from a whistleblower who says one of the US medical statistics systems shows 45,000 dead from the vaccines.  When someone signs a legal affidavit, they can go to jail if they are found to have lied, so this is a very serious claim.  If I understand correctly what is being said in the statement, 45,000 died within 3 days of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine.  From my hearing of the story, the number 45,000 originates in one or more databases other than VAERS and likely not included in VAERS.  The US has multiple data collection systems for health statistics.  Since we know that some percentage of the deaths thought to be caused by the vaccines take place beyond that window, we can assume that more than 45,000 have died from the vaccines.

Dr. Bryan Ardis clarified this information in his interview with Reiner Fuellmich.  This 45,000 number is from the CMS system, which covers Medicaid and Medicare.  So this number comes from just the old and the poor who are using these systems.  Attempting to extrapolate this number out for the entire population may pose some challenges because the Medicare portion of the population in the CMS system is older and more vulnerable.  The poor may also be somewhat more vulnerable due to diet inadequacies.  If we knew what portion of the 45,000 comes from Medicaid, that would probably give the more accurate number with which to extrapolate a number for the entire population.

We already know that the reporting rate to VAERS is possibly as low as 1%, so this number is not entirely surprising.  Rather, this whistleblower report confirms what we suspected.

Plaintiffs’ expert Jane Doe45 is a computer programmer with subject matter expertise in the healthcare data analytics field, and access to Medicare and Medicaid data maintained by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

Over the last 20 years, she has developed over 100 distinct healthcare fraud detection algorithms for use in the public and private sectors. In her expert opinion, VAERS under-reports deaths caused by the Vaccines by a conservative factor of at least 5. As of July 9, 2021, VAERS reported 9,048 deaths associated with the Vaccines. Jane Doe queried data from CMS medical claims, and has determined that the number of deaths occurring with 3 days of injection with the Vaccines exceeds those reported by VAERS by a factor of at least 5, indicating that the true number of deaths caused by the Vaccines is at least 45,000.

The producer of the Tim Truth channel has been doing some excellent analysis of the VAERS database.  One analysis done was Distribution of Days After Shot For Deaths.  By far, most deaths occur in the first few days.  A rough estimate would be that about a third of deaths have occurred in those first three days.  So taken together with the whistleblower’s number, we could safely assume that the total deaths from the vaccines is closer to 135,000, and that is probably still a conservative number, especially given that this number still needs to be extrapolated to the entire population somehow.

Screen print from Tim Truth: Deaths by Day Since Vaccination

Screen print from Tim Truth: Distribution of VAERS Reports vs. Distribution of Vaccines

We now know why the curve of published reports of death changed.  The CDC changed their policy for how to count the vaccinated and unvaccinated.

https://twitter.com/stkirsch/status/1404507654613987328

Chart from https://twitter.com/stkirsch/status/1404507654613987328 posted on June 14, 2021

Note how high the ratio gets in that last column of the chart. That is the number that the VAERS number must be multiplied by to get the CMS number. Keep in mind also that the CMS number represents only Medicaid and Medicare subscribers. The number in the general population would be more. As the number of days goes up since vaccination, it becomes more likely that the person died of something other than a vaccine reaction. This chart cannot account for that; however, I believe it is safe to assume that the ratio remains relatively high in the 30 to 60 day time frame.

Note also that these numbers come from an earlier date. If we assume that we can extrapolate these numbers to get the numbers at the time the whistleblower reported 45,000, the ratio multiplier is about 6.78, and we get the following:

Sources:

Related:

See also, on this site:

]]>
Christine Cotton shares her analysis of VAERS data https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/08/christine-cotton-shares-her-analysis-of-vaers-data/ Mon, 09 Aug 2021 00:00:50 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=4311 Christine Cotton downloaded VAERS data as of July 23, 2021. 47.1% of those who have adverse reactions entered into VAERS do not recover. Sources:

]]>
Christine Cotton downloaded VAERS data as of July 23, 2021.

47.1% of those who have adverse reactions entered into VAERS do not recover.

Sources:

]]>
Dr. Sean Brooks addresses Talawanda School District Board of Education meeting near city of Oxford, Ohio https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/08/dr-sean-brooks-addresses-talawanda-school-district-board-of-education-meeting-near-city-of-oxford-ohio/ Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:46 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=4917 The following transcript came from this source and is reproduced here with minor corrections.  I have interspersed the transcript text with the facts as I know them.  I do not have information to support every single point, but I can support most of them to some degree. My name is Dr. Sean Brooks, PhD, Oxford.1…

]]>

The following transcript came from this source and is reproduced here with minor corrections.  I have interspersed the transcript text with the facts as I know them.  I do not have information to support every single point, but I can support most of them to some degree.

My name is Dr. Sean Brooks, PhD, Oxford.1 I have 48 publications, including 23 books.2  I’ve studied health, medicine, anatomy, and physiology for approximately 21 years.

        1. He means that he is from Oxford, Ohio, which is in the school district.  He probably was not deceiving anyone present at the meeting.  Those who thought he meant Oxford University simply misunderstood due to lack of context.  There is record of a Sean M. Brooks, age 40, currently living in Oxford, Ohio.  Also, he clearly states that he is a PhD, not an MD.  What is not as clear is that health, medicine, anatomy, and physiology may not be the topics of his education, but were more likely hobby topics for him.  But then, it is not unusual for highly educated people to have hobby topics.
        2. Amazon does list books by a Sean M. Brooks; however, I am not 100% certain that this is the same author, though it is likely.

Dr. Robert Malone, who created the messenger RNA [mRNA] vaccine has said no one should ever take these jabs ever, under any circumstance whatsoever – He created it!

And he says – Don’t ever do it!3

        1. On this site: Inventor of mRNA vaccines: Vaccinate, but not with THESE vaccines!

So let me explain what’s going to happen to people who have taken, taken, excuse me – the people who have taken it – [they] are going to die in the next six months to three to five years,4 for three reasons.

        1. This might be his source for this statement:

Number one, you have dramatically decreased your own immune system by 35%. The first jab did it by at least 15. The second did it by 35.5 Now – if you take any booster shot, you will die.6 That’s it.  You take a flu shot in the future, you will die.7

        1. The report published in the Pfizer authorization does show that there are more adverse events with the second dose.  I do not know of a study that quantifies immune system loss in this manner expressed by Dr. Brooks; but if I find such a study, I will include it.
          • Research Journal
            June 13, 2021. Seth Toback, Eva Galiza, Catherine Cosgrove, James Galloway, Anna L. Goodman, Pauline A. Swift, Sankarasubramanian Rajaram, Alison Graves-Jones, Jonathan Edelman, Fiona Burns, Angela M. Minassian, Iksung Cho, Lakshmi Kumar, Joyce S. Plested, E. Joy Rivers, Andreana Robertson, Filip Dubovsky, Greg Glenn, and Paul T. Heath. “Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of a COVID-19 Vaccine (NVX-CoV2373) Co-Administered With Seasonal Influenza Vaccines.
            https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.09.21258556.
            Research Journal.
          • On this site: FDA approves Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.
        2. Israel just has begun administering booster shots.  I have not yet heard of deaths specifically from the boosters.  If I do, I will include that information here. Israel keeps a good database of such information.
        3. The CDC is now suggesting that COVID-19 jabs can be taken on the same day as routine vaccinations.  A study supports this, at least for the short term.  Of course, this assumes that the COVID-19 jabs are safe, but this is still up for debate in spite of the recent approval.
          • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
            August 13, 2021. “Routine and Influenza Immunization Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Interim Guidance.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
            https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pandemic-guidance/index.html.
            Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
          • Research Journal
            June 13, 2021. Seth Toback, Eva Galiza, Catherine Cosgrove, James Galloway, Anna L. Goodman, Pauline A. Swift, Sankarasubramanian Rajaram, Alison Graves-Jones, Jonathan Edelman, Fiona Burns, Angela M. Minassian, Iksung Cho, Lakshmi Kumar, Joyce S. Plested, E. Joy Rivers, Andreana Robertson, Filip Dubovsky, Greg Glenn, and Paul T. Heath. “Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of a COVID-19 Vaccine (NVX-CoV2373) Co-Administered With Seasonal Influenza Vaccines.
            https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.09.21258556.
            Research Journal.

The second reason – antibody dependent enhancement8 and antibody dependent enhancement is what is happening with these jabs with everybody who has taken them – unless of course you’ve taken a placebo. But there’s no way that you would know that. So given that fact, antibody dependent enhancement tricks the entire body into believing that the cell that’s eating the pathogen is eating it when it isn’t, it ends up leading to what’s called a cytokine storm, which causes organ failure. That will cause your death – and there’s no stopping that no amount of drugs will stop that.

        1. On this site: Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE)

The third thing – blood clotting.9 Everyone who has taken the jab gets blood clots. If you don’t believe me, there’s a way you can find out. Take what’s called a D-Dimer test.10 What that does, is that detects blood clotting at the microscopic level. We’re cutting full blood clots out of people right now as I’m talking to you.

        1. On this site: Tag: blood clots.
        2. The D-Dimer test is specifically mentioned in this article: Doctor confirms micro-clots In the vaccinated.  62% of Dr. Charles Hoffe’s vaccinated patients had positive results from this test, indicating that blood clotting is an extremely common adverse effect.  Dr. Hoffe believes that most of the clotting takes place in the capillaries, often causing permanent damage in certain critical organs where this occurs.  The large “rare” blood clots are occurring at an alarmingly increased rate as well.  Depending on where they develop, these can cause potentially fatal heart attacks, strokes, and pulmonary embolisms.  Nurses are seeing a major upswing in these types of events, but most are not being reported.  On this site: Minnesota state representative Erik Mortensen conducts town hall meeting with healthcare workers.

Millions have died from the jabs.11

        1. This might be exaggerated, but it is probably closer to the truth than many know. The estimate of the number who have died can be derived with simple math based on stats in VAERS and studies that were done of the usage of VAERS.  Those studies found that less than 1% of adverse events were reported to VAERS.  As of the date of this writing, September 9, 2021, there are 13,911 reported deaths from COVID-19 vaccinations as shown on OpenVAERS. If we assume that the results of the 2010 study are correct, then we simply need to multiply the reported deaths by 100, which gives 1,391,100.  However, I believe many people learned about VEARS during the course of the pandemic, so maybe 5% is closer to the truth.  Therefore, the multiplier would be 20, giving 278,220.  This is more in line with the 200,000 reported by Dr. Tenpenny’s whistleblower.  The truth may be somewhere between those numbers.  Whatever the true number is, we have clearly lost a lot of people to these jabs.

In your last [SW Ohio School Board] meeting, you advocated for people to take the jabs potentially in the future, along with wearing masks – and I heard parents say the same thing. So to the parents who are actually considering jabbing their own children, you’re going to sterilize them permanently.12 People who have taken the jabs are sterilized. 80% of [pregnant] women who have been jabbed have lost their children in the first trimester.13

        1. On this site: Japan shares biodistribution study of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. The biodistribution report showed that vaccine contents tended to enter the bloodstream and travel to various organs, particularly the sex organs.  Also, on this site: Dr Roger Hodkinson says COVID-19 jabs could cause “mass male infertility”.
        2. This is what I have on this topic, or at least this is probably where this information came from.  I have not yet evaluated it.
          • June 17, 2021. Tom T. Shimabukuro, Shin Y. Kim, Tanya R. Myers, Pedro L. Moro, Titilope Oduyebo, Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos, Paige L. Marquez, Christine K Olson, Ruiling Liu, Karen T Chang, Sascha R Ellington, Veronica K Burkel, Ashley N Smoots, Caitlin J Green, Charles Licata, Bicheng C Zhang, Meghna Alimchandani, Adamma Mba-Jonas, Stacey W Martin, Julianne M Gee, Dana M Meaney-Delman, and the CDC v-safe COVID-19 Pregnancy Registry Team. “Preliminary Findings of MRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons.” The New England Journal of Medicine 384 (24): 2273–82.
            https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983.
          • News
            July 1, 2021. Mike Adams. “DEPOPULATION ALERT: Shocking New Study Reveals Covid Vaccine TERMINATES 4 out of 5 Pregnancies via ‘Spontaneous Abortions.’” Natural News.
            https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html.
            News.

You can’t have kids. You’ve also injected yourself with the equivalent of HIV.14

        1. This particular topic is getting into knowledge unfamiliar to me and seemingly involves advanced topics, but I will do my best to pull together something useful.  The first couple of links are a more layman description of what the COVID-19 inoculations are.  This background is needed because the studies that follow use unfamiliar terminology that is at least somewhat clarified by the initial article.  The studies express concern about a certain type of inoculation which the COVID-19 inoculations appear to be.

You can now no longer breastfeed,15 donate blood, donate organs, donate blood plasma,16 nor bone marrow. If you don’t believe me, try to donate blood and blood plasma and find out what happens. You will be denied. Unless of course you live in California, in which case they’re allowing people to donate toxic blood with spike proteins in it.

        1. At least one breastfeeding baby has died.
        2. On this site: Red Cross issues statement on collecting convalescent plasma for treatment of COVID-19

The jabs create spike proteins. They’re in the jabs themselves.17 And they create it by snapping your RNA in half.18

        1. This is true and well-known.
        2. I do not know the specific mechanism of action.  I don’t believe that I can address this with the knowledge I have; however, I can offer the following:

You’re no longer a human anymore. You’re something else19 – and you’re susceptible to countless diseases.20

        1. This may seem like a hyperbolic statement, but it is probably closer to the truth than many would want to admit.
        2. This is true, though it needs support.

Now here’s what’s going to happen in the future – very quickly.

(You have 15 seconds.)

Great.

I don’t know what percentage of your staff is taking the jabs – but your school is going to close – you will not stay open. You will close because they will fall ill and they will die. That will happen in all of your buildings. It will have its way – it’s already happening –

(All right – thank you sir.)

I bet it is.

It’s already happening – and – good luck.

(Thank you…)

Nothing can stop it.

(Thank you sir.)

Thank you!

Sources:

]]>
Reports came in. Let’s crunch some numbers! https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/08/reports-came-in-lets-crunch-some-numbers/ Fri, 20 Aug 2021 00:00:37 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=5127 All calculations below use death statistics.  These calculations use data from government sources.  Some analyses are being done using numbers from all-cause deaths, which have increased significantly.  One of these analyses is shown in Statistics and Calculation #5.  Under Statistics and Calculation #4, I also show a chart of relative risks compared to other causes…

]]>
All calculations below use death statistics.  These calculations use data from government sources.  Some analyses are being done using numbers from all-cause deaths, which have increased significantly.  One of these analyses is shown in Statistics and Calculation #5.  Under Statistics and Calculation #4, I also show a chart of relative risks compared to other causes of death.

Were we to do the same with statistics for those suffering from life-changing adverse events, there would be much greater cause for concern.  Unfortunately, those statistics are not as readily available.

It is probably at least as important to check statistics for life-changing adverse events as well, since they affect quality of life, but those are not as readily available.

It is difficult to know how these numbers might have been different had early treatment been part of the standard protocols.  Early treatment protocols do exist, but they are generally shunned by mainstream doctors.  Given the success reported by those who use early treatment protocols, failure to provide care according to these early treatment protocols is medical negligence at best and possibly criminal.

It is also difficult to know how many of the “unvaccinated” in these statistics are actually freshly vaccinated people who suffered an adverse event.  In a statistical sleight of hand, those who received their first dose within 14 days of death are reported as “unvaccinated.”


Statistics and Calculation #1

Calculations someone did based on Technical Briefing 21

The case numbers come from page 22 of Technical Briefing 21, “Delta cases” block, “All cases” line, last two columns.  The death numbers come from page 23 of Technical Briefing 21, last line of chart, last two columns.

Vaccine status Cases Deaths Ratio Deaths per 100,000
>14 days post dose 2 73,372 679 679 ÷ 73,372 = 0.00925421 925
Unvaccinated 183,133 390 390 ÷ 183,133 = 0.00212959 213

925 ÷ 213 = 4.34

These numbers show that vaccinated COVID-19 patients are more than 4 times more likely to die than unvaccinated COVID-19 patients.

It appears that England is using the same 14-day qualifier for COVID-19 death classifications. If so, then some of the deaths in the unvaccinated row had just gotten the jab.

Source for Statistics and Calculation #1:


Statistics and Calculation #2

The video linked below explains how the calculations are done.  The numbers come from the last two columns of the chart on page 14 in the Week 36 report.

Age Group Cases among
vaccinated
per 100,000
Cases among
unvaccinated
per 100,000
Cases among
vaccinated
per 100,000
Cases among
unvaccinated
per 100,000
Under 18 476 1,192.9 1,969.3
33.80%
3,857.6
66.20%
18 – 29 711.1 1,520.8
30 – 39 782.2 1,143.9
40 – 49 1,116.2 880.4 3,622.1
55.60%
2,892.5
44.40%
50 – 59 962 729.7
60 – 69 672.3 487.5
70 – 79 480.5 367.5
80 and over 391.1 427.4
5,591.4
45.31%
6,750.1
54.69%

It would appear that people older than 40 are less likely to get sick if they have not been vaccinated.

It appears that England is using the same 14-day qualifier for COVID-19 death classifications. If so, then some of the deaths in the unvaccinated columns had just gotten the jab.

Sources for Statistics and Calculation #2:


Statistics and Calculation #3

The following is based on Infection Fatality Rate Scenario #5 in the CDC’s COVID-19 Pandemic Planning ScenariosThese are PROJECTIONS, not actual numbers.  Actuals are shown in Statistics #4.

Age Group Deaths in
1,000,000
Survival
Rate
Death
Ratio
0 – 17 years 20 99.998% 1 in 50,000
Teens at NSW stadium jab event, on the spot1 125 99.988% 1 in 8,000
18 – 49 years 500 99.950% 1 in 2,000
Teens at NSW stadium jab event, estimate over time2 625 99.938% 1 in 1,600
50 – 64 years 6,000 99.400% 1 in 167
65 years and older 90,000 91.000% 1 in 11
  1. Numbers extrapolated to the rate per 1,000,000 so that they can be properly compared with other numbers in this chart.  And these teens could still become infected with COVID-19 later.
  2. Numbers extrapolated to the rate per 1,000,000.  This is a conservative estimate based on 5 times the number who died at the event.  The multiplier was obtained by eye-balling a “death curve” from an analysis of VAERS numbers.  The multiplier could be accomplished in less than a week, according to the numbers on the “death curve.”

Sources for Statistics and Calculation #3:


Statistics #4

Generally, elderly people who live in the general community have a high survival rate.  Oddly, the IFR in UK was much higher than anywhere else, both for the community-dwelling and institutionalized.  UK has one of the highest jab rates in the world with the rate among institutionalized elderly virtually 100%.

We could extract data and calculate IFR on another 84 age-strata observations from 19/23 seroprevalence surveys (three had no mortality data for any eligible non-elderly age stratum (25, 30, 35) and one sampled no individuals <65 years of age (44)). The 19 surveys came from 11 countries. For the age group 0-19 years, only five studies had sampled participants for seroprevalence in the corresponding age group (24, 29, 31, 38, 41); for the other studies, the closest available age group was used. Across all countries (Figure 3), the median IFR was 0.0027%, 0.014%, 0.031%, 0.082%, 0.27%, and 0.59%, at 0-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 60-69 years, using data from 9, 9, 10, 9, 11, and 6 countries, respectively.

Just for fun and comparison, I’m going to mix some general death statistics into this next chart.  We will all die of something.  How do our odds of dying of COVID-19 stack up to other causes of death?  When we look at the numbers this way, it doesn’t look so grim.  The added statistics will be marked with  this background .

Age Group Deaths in 1,000,000 Survival Rate Death Ratio
Struck by lightening 12 99.9988% 1 in 84,079
Dog attack 12 99.9988% 1 in 86,781
COVID-19, 0 – 19 years 27 99.9973% 1 in 37,037
Sharp objects 34 99.9966% 1 in 29,334
Sunstroke 121 99.9879% 1 in 8,248
Teens at NSW stadium jab event, on the spot1 125 99.9875% 1 in 8,000
COVID-19, 20 – 29 years 140 99.9860% 1 in 7,143
Airplane crash 142 99.9858% 1 in 7,032
COVID-19, 30 – 39 years 310 99.9690% 1 in 3,226
Teens at NSW stadium jab event, estimate over time2 625 99.9375% 1 in 1,600
Fire or smoke 646 99.9354% 1 in 1,547
COVID-19, 40 – 49 years 820 99.9180% 1 in 1,220
Drowning 887 99.9113% 1 in 1,128
Motorcyclist 1,112 99.8888% 1 in 899
Pedestrian incident 1,842 99.8158% 1 in 543
COVID-19, 50 – 59 years 2,700 99.7300% 1 in 370
Gun assault 3,460 99.6540% 1 in 289
COVID-19, 60 – 69 years 5,900 99.4100% 1 in 169
Motor vehicle crash 9,346 99.0654% 1 in 107
Falls 9,434 99.0566% 1 in 106
Opioid drug overdose 10,870 98.9130% 1 in 92
Suicide 11,364 98.8636% 1 in 88
COVID-19, Community-dwelling elderly, all locations 24,000 97.6000% 1 in 42
COVID-19, All elderly, all locations 55,000 94.5000% 1 in 18
COVID-19, Community-dwelling elderly, Public Health England 85,900 91.4100% 1 in 12
COVID-19, All elderly, Public Health England 140,300 85.9700% 1 in 7
Cancer 142,857 85.7143% 1 in 7
Heart disease 166,667 83,333% 1 in 6
  1. Numbers extrapolated to the rate per 1,000,000.  And they could still become infected with COVID-19 later.
  2. Numbers extrapolated to the rate per 1,000,000.  This is a conservative estimate based on 5 times the number who died at the event.  The multiplier was obtained by eye-balling a “death curve” from an analysis of VAERS numbers.  The multiplier could be accomplished in less than a week, according to the numbers on the “death curve.”  The actual number of deaths resulting from this event are likely to be higher.

Sources for Statistics #4:


Statistics #5

Here is a novel idea.  Don’t be so concerned for whether the injections actually killed the people.  Just look at all-cause mortality and whether the person had ever taken a COVID-19 vaccine.  Fortunately, England has the data needed for this one. Please see the article for details of how the authors came up with these graphs.  They state:

It turns out that, even using this age adjusted mortality rate, the death rate is currently higher among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated.

Sources for Statistics #5:


It appears that England is using the same 14-day qualifier for COVID-19 death classifications. If so, there actually could be far more deaths among the vaccinated than at first it appears.

Extra source:

  • Video
    October 10, 2021. Simple Statistical Analysis Showing the INSANITY of Taking the CV19 “Vaccine.” Jim Fetzer. Runtime: 2:56.
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/BlxdEzTTWDaI/.
    Video.
    “Once you’ve applied a moment of critical thinking, you’ll find that anyone advocating these requests (‘mandates’) is either uninformed, irrational or has an ulterior motive for suggesting that everyone should be vaccinated.”

See also, on this site:

The following is the “death curve” from an analysis of VAERS numbers.  I used this to estimate how many actually died over time as a result of the NSW stadium jab event.

Screen print from Tim Truth: Deaths by Day Since Vaccination

]]>