The Nuremberg Code (German: Nürnberger Kodex) is part of a judicial ruling.  The Kodex has not been officially accepted as law by any nation or as official ethics guidelines by any association.  In the US, when preparing a legal case, refer to the National Research Act, which is legislation from the US Congress.  The National Research Act implements key provisions from the Nuremberg Code.

Following World War II, tribunals were held in Nuremberg, Germany.  Among those tried were the doctors in the Nazi concentration camps where prisoners were forced to participate in medical experiments.  The ten points of the Nuremberg Code were given in the section of the judges’ verdict against Nazi doctors entitled “Permissible Medical Experiments.”  The following is a summary.

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probably cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

For the detailed list, please see this article: Nuremberg Code

Sources:

• 
  United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. “Nuremberg Code.”
  https://www.ushmm.org/information/exhibitions/online-exhibitions/special-focus/doctors-trial/nuremberg-code.
  General Website Link.
• 
  “Nuremberg Code.” In Wikipedia.
  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nuremberg_Code.
  Reference.
• 
  November 13, 1997. Evelyne Shuster. “Fifty Years Later: The Significance of the Nuremberg Code.” New England Journal of Medicine 337 (20): 1436–40.
  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199711133372006.
  Research Journal.

Related:

• 
  October 20, 2021. “Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine [Pfizer-BioNTech].” US Food & Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download.
  Food & Drug Administration.
  This document has instructions for healthcare providers who are administering the vaccines.
• 
  October 19, 2005. “Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: UNESCO.” United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
  http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html.
  General Website Link.
  Article 3.2: “The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society.”
  And there is more in this document related to the issue at hand, all of which is also being violated in the current crisis.

See also, on this site:

• The National Research Act is signed into law.
• FDA approves Comirnaty COVID-19 Vaccine
• Federal judge rejects DOD claim that Pfizer EUA and Comirnaty vaccines are ‘interchangeable’

The National Research Act was enacted by the 93rd United States Congress and signed into law by President Richard Nixon on July 12, 1974 after a series of congressional hearings on human-subjects research, directed by Senator Edward Kennedy. The National Research Act created the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research to develop guidelines for human subject research and to oversee and regulate the use of human experimentation in medicine. The National Research Act issued Title 45, Part 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations [45 CFR 46]: Protection of Human Subjects. The National Research Act is overseen by the Office of Human Research Protections. The Act also formalized a regulated IRB process through local institutional review boards, also overseen by the Office of Human Research Protections.

The National Research Act gained traction as a response to the infamous Tuskegee syphilis study.

Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA vaccines, explains the protections provided by the National Research Act this way:

So point number one, just to summarize; you can find it in The Code of Federal Regulations. It’s referred to as the Common Rule. So this is actually Federal Law. It’s not just words that academicians agree to. The first thing is that an emergency use authorization product, which is what all these vaccines are, as well as many of the drugs, is an experimental product. It’s not yet licensed. So that’s point number one. They’re all experimental products.

Point number two; if you’re going to be administering experimental products to patients, that falls under clinical research, and medical research. And so you have to follow the guidance for medical research. I mentioned the Common Rule is codified in the Code of Federal Regulations.

The first clause, importantly, in the Common Rule, is there has to be complete disclosure of risk. Intuitively, what that means is, when you buy a bottle of aspirin, you pull out this little piece of paper. You look at that, and you go, “Holy Moly, this aspirin is going to kill me.” If you read all the way through, it says it could cause heart attacks or gastric erosions. You look at that and you say, “Oh, I don’t know if I want to take that aspirin.”

But the truth is that the ones that are common are up at the top. We all take aspirin or Tylenol or some version of that. That’s the level of disclosure of adverse event risk that must be provided to patients participating in clinical research. That level of information, as we’ve just been discussing, is censored. It’s not available. So we are not meeting the criteria for full disclosure of risk.

Second key principle is that that full disclosure has to be comprehensible and comprehended. Earlier on, I referred to Thrombocytopenia, and you said, “What the heck was that?” And I said, “Low platelets.” That’s a great example. The first one was scientific jargon that was incomprehensible to you. The second one you could understand. So these risks have to be conveyed using language that people can comprehend.

Third key principle; you cannot coerce. You cannot entice. The patient or the subject has to freely accept the experimental medicine of their own volition. All this messaging about, “You must take the vaccine. You must take the vaccine because otherwise Aunt Mary could get infected.” All of this messaging that the vaccine is safe, and all the peer pressure that’s happening around the vaccine is coercion.

Now it gets even more florid with other nations. I don’t think we’ve done it here in the States, but Canada has. “We are going to give out ice cream cones to get the kiddies to come and take the jab.” That’s been done. That’s coercion and enticement.

Then there’s the last little codicil in all this. We call it the age of consent. So we here in the States generally agree that the age of consent is 18. If you are at or below the age of consent, you need to have approval or consent from your parent or guardian to take an experimental medicine. They act as your agent because you’re not able to provide consent by definition.

We cannot, by law, have infants, children, and adolescents receiving experimental products without authorization of their parents.

Now, listening to this, [one] might say, “Well, we have this special case of an epidemic, and we all have to get the vaccine.” Why do we all have to get the vaccine? What’s the logic behind that? What we’re told is, “We all have to get vaccinated so we will reach herd immunity.” That’s the logic.

The problem is that this is a fallacy. We have not even gathered the data to be able to calculate in these clinical trials what would give us herd immunity. What would herd immunity mean? It would mean that we have what’s called sterilizing immunity, or in some way, if we get infected, that we don’t spread it to somebody else. That means that we’re not producing virus and shedding virus.

Sources:

• 
  July 12, 1974. Paul G. Rogers. “H.R.7724 – 93rd Congress (1973-1974): An Act to Amend the Public Health Service Act to Establish a Program of National Research Service Awards to Assure the Continued Excellence of Biomedical and Behavioral Research and to Provide for the Protection of Human Subjects Involved in Biomedical and Behavioral Research and for Other Purposes.” Federal Legislation. 1973/1974.
  https://www.congress.gov/bill/93rd-congress/house-bill/7724.
  Government.
• 
  “National Research Act.” In Wikipedia.
  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Research_Act.
  Reference.
• 
  June 23, 2009. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. “Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (‘Common Rule’).”
  https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/common-rule/index.html.
  Government.
• 
  April 18, 1979. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. “The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research.”
  https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/the-belmont-report-508c_FINAL.pdf.
  Government, PDF.
• 
  February 16, 2016. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. “45 CFR 46.”
  https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.html.
  Government.
• 
  August 12, 2021. “DO NOT QUIT YOUR JOB.” America’s Frontline Doctors.
  https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/do-not-quit-your-job/.
  Doctor Organization, Activist.
• 
  May 27, 2021. “Vaccines & The Law.” America’s Frontline Doctors.
  https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/legal/vaccines-the-law/.
  Doctor Organization, Activist.
  This page has links to documents and legal assistance to help you in your fight against COVID mandates.
• 
  January 1997. G. L. Chadwick. “Historical Perspective: Nuremberg, Tuskegee, and the Radiation Experiments.” Journal of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care 3 (1): 27–28.
  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11363960/.
  National Institutes of Health.
• 
  July 6, 2021. Jan Jekielek. “Dr. Robert Malone, MRNA Vaccine Inventor, on the Bioethics of Experimental Vaccines and the ‘Ultimate Gaslighting.’” Epoch TV: American Thought Leaders.
  https://www.theepochtimes.com/dr-robert-malone-mrna-vaccine-inventor-on-the-bioethics-of-experimental-vaccines-and-the-ultimate-gaslighting_3889805.html.
  News, Expert.
• 
  June 17, 2010. Megan Kearl. “45 CFR 46: Protection of Human Subjects under United States Law (1974).” The Embryo Project Encyclopedia.
  https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/45-cfr-46-protection-human-subjects-under-united-states-law-1974.
  University.

Related:

• 
  “Tuskegee Syphilis Study.” In Wikipedia.
  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tuskegee_Syphilis_Study.
  Reference.
• 
  October 20, 2021. “Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine [Pfizer-BioNTech].” US Food & Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download.
  Food & Drug Administration.
  This document has instructions for healthcare providers who are administering the vaccines.
• 
  May 12, 2021. Tom Shimabukuro. “Update: Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS) Following COVID-19 Vaccination.” Presentation slides. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
  https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2021-05-12/07-COVID-Shimabukuro-508.pdf.
  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Presentation, PDF.

See also, on this site:

• The ten points of the Nuremberg Code

This Supreme Court decision allows for the patenting of living organisms, which had been forbidden prior to this decision.

From the filing:

In 1972, respondent [Ananda M.] Chakrabarty, a microbiologist, filed a patent application, assigned to the General Electric Co.  The application asserted 36 claims related to Chakrabarty’s invention of “a bacterium from the genus Pseudomonas containing therein at least two stable energy-generating plasmids, each of said plasmids providing a separate hydrocarbon degradative pathway.”  This human-made, genetically engineered bacterium is capable of breaking down multiple components of crude oil.  Because of this property, which is possessed by no naturally occurring bacteria, Chakrabarty’s invention is believed to have significant value for the treatment of oil spills.

Source:

• 
  June 16, 1980. US Supreme Court. Sidney A. DIAMOND, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Petitioner, v. Ananda M. CHAKRABARTY et al. Cornell Law School: Legal Information Institute.
  https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/447/303.
  University, Judgment.

See also, on this site:

• Report: mRNA “vaccines” are converted to DNA in the liver

NCVIA’s purpose was to eliminate the potential financial liability of vaccine manufacturers due to vaccine injury claims in order to ensure a stable market supply of vaccines, and to provide cost-effective arbitration for vaccine injury claims.  The Justice Department was put in charge of the compensation program in an unprecedented arrangement.  Vice President George H. W. Bush encouraged the signing of this bill in spite of objections from the Justice Department.

“There are so many of them. They give them to them so quickly. Like, from the moment they’re born, they want to bang them up with vaccines.”

What very few people know about the childhood vaccine schedule is that, in the early 1980s, vaccine manufacturers were losing BIG money.

For every $1 they made off the DTP vaccine, they were losing about $20 to injury lawsuits.

So Wyeth (now Pfizer) went to the Reagan White House and demanded liability protections with the threat of getting out of the vaccine business.

President Reagan asked Wyeth why they couldn’t make safer vaccines. Wyeth answered that they couldn’t because vaccines are “unavoidably” unsafe.

This led to the signing of the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act, which gave vaccine manufacturers special liability protections.

“And so, anybody who tells you vaccines are safe and effective, the industry itself got immunity from liability by convincing the President and Congress that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe,” Robert Kennedy Jr. told Joe Rogan in a previous interview.

— Joe Rogan Raises SERIOUS Questions About the Childhood Vaccine Schedule

“Isn’t it weird that you can just lie to people, and you could force people to take things, and you could hide the side effects, and you can’t sue them?”

Vaccines are the ONLY product that you can’t sue the manufacturers directly.

— Joe Rogan Drops Great Vaccine Question

Sources:

• 
  October 18, 1986. Henry A. Waxman. “H.R.5546 – 99th Congress (1985-1986): National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.” Federal Legislation. 1985/1986.
  https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546.
  Government.
• 
  November 15, 1986. Robert Pear. “REAGAN SIGNS BILL ON DRUG EXPORTS AND PAYMENT FOR VACCINE INJURIES.” News. The New York Times.
  https://www.nytimes.com/1986/11/15/us/reagan-signs-bill-on-drug-exports-and-payment-for-vaccine-injuries.html.
  News.
• 
  January 21, 2021. “National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.” In Wikipedia.
  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Childhood_Vaccine_Injury_Act.
  Reference.
• 
  March 27, 2024. “Joe Rogan Drops Great Vaccine Question.” Vigilant News Network.
  https://vigilantnews.com/post/joe-rogan-drops-great-vaccine-question/.
  General Website Link.
• 
  September 6, 2024. “Joe Rogan Raises SERIOUS Questions About the Childhood Vaccine Schedule.” Vigilant News Network.
  https://vigilantnews.com/post/joe-rogan-raises-serious-questions-about-the-childhood-vaccine-schedule/.
  General Website Link.

Related:

• 
  “The Real Andy Wakefield.” 1986: The Act.
  https://7thchakrafilms.com/film-info/the-director.
  General Website Link.
  This page includes a timeline of events for the MMR-Autism controversy. “To this day, Dr. Andrew Wakefield is credited by many health care practitioners who know his story as a pioneer in the study of the gut/brain connection in modern medicine.”
• 
  March 31, 2021. Greg Penglis. “The Vaccine Manufacturer Full Product Liability Restoration Act of 2021.” Write Your Laws.
  https://writeyourlaws.com/the-vaccine-manufacturer-full-product-liability-restoration-act-of-2021.
  General Website Link.
  Proposed law change.

The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act is prepared by The Center for Law and the Public’s Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]

The MSEHPA (Model State Emergency Health Powers Act) which was passed by many states in 2002, included provisions that would allow state health officials to use the state militia to:

Take control of all roads leading into and out of cities and states;

Seize homes, cars, telephones, computers, food, fuel, clothing, firearms and alcoholic beverages for their own use (and not be held liable if these actions result in the destruction of  personal property);

Arrest, imprison and forcibly examine, vaccinate and medicate citizens without consent (and not be held liable if these actions result in your death or injury).

— ce399

Fortunately for the People, the Supremacy Clause in the U.S. Constitution declares that where federal and state laws conflict, federal law supersedes state law.

Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause.  It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions. It prohibits states from interfering with the federal government’s exercise of its constitutional powers, and from assuming any functions that are exclusively entrusted to the federal government. It does not, however, allow the federal government to review or veto state laws before they take effect.

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.
— US Constitution, Article VI, paragraph 2

The National Research Act (also known as The Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects or The Common Rule) is federal law.  The Emergency Health Powers Acts are state laws.  Therefore, none of the Emergency Health Powers Acts can violate the protections provided in the National Research Act.  Please refer to the article about the National Research Act for further details.

Sources:

• 
  December 21, 2001. Lawrence O Gostin. The Center for Law and the Public’s Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities. “The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act.”
  https://www.aapsonline.org/legis/msehpa2.pdf.
  University, PDF.
• 
  August 7, 2002. Lawrence O. Gostin, Jason W. Sapsin, Stephen P. Teret, Scott Burris, Julie Samia Mair, James G. Hodge, and Jon S. Vernick. “The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act: Planning for and Response to Bioterrorism and Naturally Occurring Infectious Diseases.” JAMA 288 (5): 622–28.
  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.5.622.
  Research Journal.
• 
  American Civil Liberties Union. “Model State Emergency Health Powers Act.”
  https://www.aclu.org/other/model-state-emergency-health-powers-act.
  Activist.
• 
  July 22, 2021. National Conference of State Legislatures. “Legislative Oversight of Emergency Executive Powers.”
  https://www.ncsl.org/research/about-state-legislatures/legislative-oversight-of-executive-orders.aspx.
  Collaboration.
• 
  September 1, 2010. Mathew Foley. “The Turning Point Model State Public Health Act: Emergency Public Health Law versus Civil Liberties.” AMA Journal of Ethics 12 (9): 735–38.
  https://doi.org/10.1001/virtualmentor.2010.12.9.pfor2-1009.
  Research Journal.
• 
  April 21, 2003. Edward P. Richards and Katharine C. Rathbun. “Review of the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act.” LSU Law Center Climate Change Law and Policy Project.
  https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/blaw/bt/MSEHPA_review.htm.
  University.
• 
  “Model State Emergency Health Powers Act.” In Wikipedia.
  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Model_State_Emergency_Health_Powers_Act.
  Reference.
• 
  June 10, 2002. Sue Blevins. “The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act: An Assault on Civil Liberties in the Name of Homeland Security.” The Heritage Foundation.
  https://www.heritage.org/homeland-security/report/the-model-state-emergency-health-powers-act-assault-civil-liberties-the.
  Blog.
• 
  July 15, 2009. “Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (Swine Flu Vaccination Alert).” Ce399 | Research Archive.
  https://ce399.typepad.com/weblog/2009/07/mode.html.
  Blog.
• 
  October 6, 2009. Joe Hashmall. “Supremacy Clause.” LII / Legal Information Institute.
  https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/supremacy_clause.
  University.
• 
  September 17, 1787. “U.S. Constitution, Article VI.” LII / Legal Information Institute.
  https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlevi.
  University.

See also, on this site:

• The National Research Act is signed into law.
• How Trump’s vaccines prevent the Great Reset and save humanity
• The governor of New Mexico invokes a state Emergency Health Powers Act

Legislation by state.

• 
  September 12, 2009. Jenna L. Minegar. “50 States – Government Health Powers.” Citizens’ Council on Health Care.
  https://www.cchfreedom.org/publichealthpowers/50-States-URL-list.pdf.
  PDF.
• 
  April 16, 2002. “Protecting Democracy: America’s Legislatures Respond.” National Conference of State Legislatures.
  https://www.ncsl.org/Portals/1/documents/press/2002/5health.pdf.
  Collaboration, PDF.

The following map is provided as a research hint.

This map is probably good as of sometime in 2006.
More states may have passed an Emergency Health Powers Act by now.
http://www.rwjf.org/files/publications/annual/2006/images/chart-publichealth.gif

This list below of links by state is nowhere near complete at this time.  Emergency Health Powers Acts have been enacted in at least 34 states.  Eventually, I will get more of this filled in.

Alabama

Alaska

Arizona

Arkansas

California

• 
  March 15, 2019. Peter (CDPH-OLS) Baldridge. “Public Health and Medical Emergency Powers,” 27.
  https://emsa.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/71/2019/03/New-EOM-Public-Health-and-Medical-Emergency-Powers-3-15-2019-002.pdf.
  Government, PDF.

Colorado

Connecticut

Delaware

Florida

Georgia

Hawaii

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maine

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Mississippi

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

New Hampshire

New Jersey

• 
  September 14, 2005. New Jersey Legislature. “P.L.2005, c.222 (S2085 4R).”
  https://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2004/Bills/PL05/222_.HTM.
  Government.
• 
  March 24, 2006. “Regulation 61-112: Implementation of Emergency Health Powers Act.”
  https://scdhec.gov/sites/default/files/media/document/R.61-112.pdf.
  Government, PDF.

New Mexico

New York

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

South Carolina

• 
  “Code of Laws – Title 44 – Chapter 4 – Emergency Health Powers.” South Carolina Legislature.
  https://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t44c004.php.
  Government.

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Vermont

Virginia

Washington

West Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming

Federal law does not prohibit public agencies and private businesses from requiring COVID-19 vaccines that are under emergency use authorization, the Department of Justice concluded in an opinion.

The Department of Justice was asked if the COVID-19 vaccines could be mandated.  In response, Acting Assistant Attorney General Dawn Johnsen issued a memo saying that the vaccines could be mandated. But apparently, she missed the National Research Act of 1974 in her considerations. That legislated law upholds the philosophy of the Nuremberg Code that it is a serious crime to force an experimental drug or procedure on anyone, including prisoners.  Informed consent without coercion is absolutely required in their administration.  Threat of the loss of a job or privileges is coercion.  By definition, EUA drugs are experimental drugs that are being made available to those who believe such drugs may help in an emergency situation in which no other options are available.

Sources:

• 
  July 6, 2021. Dawn Johnsen. U.S. Department of Justice. “Whether Section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act Prohibits Entities from Requiring the Use of a Vaccine Subject to an Emergency Use Authorization.”
  https://www.justice.gov/olc/file/1415446/download.
  Government.
• 
  August 12, 2021. “DO NOT QUIT YOUR JOB.” America’s Frontline Doctors.
  https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/do-not-quit-your-job/.
  Doctor Organization, Activist.
• 
  May 27, 2021. “Vaccines & The Law.” America’s Frontline Doctors.
  https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/legal/vaccines-the-law/.
  Doctor Organization, Activist.
  This page has links to documents and legal assistance to help you in your fight against COVID mandates.
• 
  July 27, 2021. Brooke Singman. “DOJ Declares Vaccine Mandates Legal.” Fox News.
  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-vaccine-mandates-legal.
  News.
• 
  July 28, 2021. Stew Peters Show. DEADLY SHOTS! Former Pfizer Employee Confirms Poison in COVID “Vaccine.” Runtime: 25:14.
  https://rumble.com/vkgdq7-deadly-shots-former-pfizer-employee-confirms-poison-in-covid-vaccine.html.
  Video.
  Karen Kingston in her interview with Stew Peters states that the vaccines violate several other laws in their manufacture and should never have received emergency use authorizations in the first place.  Once the vaccine campaign began, the vaccines should have already been halted for any of a dozen reasons. Karen Kingston cites several laws by number. Please refer to the video for information about relevant laws, beginning at 17:15.

See also, on this site:

• Federal judge rejects DOD claim that Pfizer EUA and Comirnaty vaccines are ‘interchangeable’
• Dr. McCullough and Dr. Zelenko testify at Senate Homeland Security Committee hearing
• The National Research Act is signed into law.
• The ten points of the Nuremberg Code
• The United States Senate holds Hearing on COVID-19 Outpatient Treatment.
• FDA Revokes Emergency Use Authorization for Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine

We laid the foundation for everybody’s court case now.  So everybody’s court case will go exactly the way I am.  And what they need to do and everybody needs to do is you need to challenge the public health act in your provinces, in your states, wherever you are.  You file a challenge against these health acts, and that way the judge has no recourse.  She has to subpoena the government officials that are responsible for this.  So now we’re going to get them all on the stand.

Unfortunately, Patrick King still had to pay the fine, but Alberta is being freed from COVID-19 restrictions.  Alberta will now be treating COVID-19 the same way they do the flu.  Patrick King said that representing himself in court actually gave him more options in his defense.  Please listen to his interview with Dr. Jane Ruby for details about how that works.

Sources:

• 
  August 3, 2021. Stew Peters with Patrick King. “Freedom Fighter Court VICTORY! Ends Masking, Shots, Quarantine in Alberta! (Updated With Legal Documents).” The Stew Peters Show.
  https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/08/freedom-fighter-court-victory-ends-masking-shots-quarantine-in-alberta/.
  News, Video, Key.
• 

  August 5, 2021. Jane Ruby and Patrick King. Canadian Hero Demands Whole Virus Proof & Frees Alberta From Covid Restrictions! War Room. Runtime: 29:21.
  https://www.bitchute.com/video/ACmWZjDAw2HW/.
  Video.
• 
  August 3, 2021. “Alberta Court Victory ENDS Covid.” Our Greater Destiny.
  https://ourgreaterdestiny.org/2021/08/alberta-court-victory-ends-covid/.
  Blog.
  This is a written summary of Stew Peters interview with Patrick King.
• 
  July 16, 2021. Cynthia R. Hykaway. “Deena Hinshaw v. Patrick James King (2110 00751): Summons.” Red Deer Court of Queen’s Bench.
  https://www.redvoicemedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/2021.08.04-07.49-redvoicemedia-610aef37895da.pdf.
  Law, PDF.
• 
  “Deena Hinshaw v. Patrick James King (2110 00751): LAW Relied on by the Applicant.”
  https://www.redvoicemedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/2021.08.04-07.49-redvoicemedia-610aef3564a95.pdf.
  Law, PDF.
• 
  July 16, 2021. “Deena Hinshaw v. Patrick James King (2110 00751): Affidavit of Krisztina Grech.” Red Deer Court of Queen’s Bench.
  https://www.redvoicemedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/2021.08.04-07.49-redvoicemedia-610aef3334bb1.pdf.
  Law, PDF.
• 
  July 16, 2021. Cynthia R. Hykaway. “Deena Hinshaw v. Patrick James King (2110 00751): Originating Application.” Red Deer Court of Queen’s Bench.
  https://www.redvoicemedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/2021.08.04-07.48-redvoicemedia-610aef29c1269.pdf.
  Law, PDF.
• 
  “Deena Hinshaw.” In Wikipedia.
  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deena_Hinshaw.
  Reference.

Related:

• 
  August 6, 2021. Government Of Ireland Admits NO Proof SARS-CoV-2 Exists! War Room. Runtime: 10:23.
  https://www.bitchute.com/video/8kMIqP14i3qh/.
  Video.
  Ireland could not produce documentation, either.
• 
  August 2, 2021. Mike Adams. The Covid-19 FRAUD: The Entire Industry of Viral Infectious Disease Is Based on Complete FICTION. Health Ranger Report.  Runtime: 38:37.
  https://www.brighteon.com/a6149c85-923e-4ecb-8f77-b6c1d9e05f1c.
  Video.
  Mike Adams explains his quest as a lab owner of trying to find a SARS-CoV-2 virus isolate as a certified reference material.  All he could find was what he calls “snot stew.”  It was not an isolate, and it was not certified.

See also, on this site:

• PCR test results create false alarm at a hospital.  This event, folks, illustrates why the evidence Patrick King requested is so important.

The secretary of defense at least recognizes that none of the COVID-19 vaccines have been approved by the FDA.  They are all still in testing.  The expectation that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine could achieve full FDA licensure early next month seems optimistic to me.  There is an extensive schedule of testing that any vaccination must complete to receive FDA approval.  Already, test results are coming in indicating that there are serious problems with the vaccines, including the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

Let’s get clear on that last highlighted statement; No vaccine may be declared “safe” or “effective” until all required tests are completed and the FDA issues approval.  At this time, the vaccines have been made available under the terms of Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA).  The terms of EUAs clearly specify that neither “safe” nor “effective” may be used to describe these products until they are declared so by the FDA.  That has not yet happened.  None of these products are fully licensed yet.

It came out in a recent press conference that the FDA did not use the gene therapy checklist when approving the vaccines.  Early paperwork identified the mRNA vaccines as gene therapies, and so the gene therapy checklist most definitely applies.  Gene therapy testing has not been completed, and so the Comirnaty approval can be challenged on that basis, if you can find it at all.

The ability to mandate the use of unapproved drugs by the military is controlled by 10 U.S.C. § 1107 – Notice of use of an investigational new drug or a drug unapproved for its applied use.  Normally, consent is required from the member.  To override consent, the president must grant a waiver.  See 10 U.S.C. § 1107(f)(1).  If you want to refuse the vaccine, there is the precedent case of Doe V. Rumsfeld, but the actual law allows for an exception.

Let’s do a little math here. In a recent event, New South Wales, Australia brought 24,000 teenagers to a stadium without their parents present and jabbed them all.  Three of those teenagers died on the spot.  So that is one in 8,000 dead on the spot.  Let’s extrapolate that out to the military. The plan is to jab approximately 1,300,000 service members, many of whom are not that much older than the teenagers in NSW. If 1 in 8,000 will die on the spot when jabbed, that is about 162 service members that could be dead on the spot. There will be more deaths than that, since mean days until death from the jabs has been calculated to be 22 days. And that does not consider how many will be permanently disabled due to the jabs. Reportedly, only 20 service members died of COVID-19 in all of 2020. If the extrapolation is accurate, the Jab Day 1 death toll will be more than 8 TIMES the military’s 2020 COVID-19 death toll. And someone actually thinks it is a good idea to impose COVID-19 jabs on the military? Who does that person work for, really?

Meanwhile, it appears that at least some of you may be replaced by robots.

Sources:

• 
  August 9, 2021. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin. “MEMORANDUM FOR ALL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EMPLOYEES.” U.S Department of Defense. https://media.defense.gov/2021/Aug/09/2002826254/-1/-1/0/Message-to-the-Force-Memo-Vaccine-FINAL.PDF.
  Department of Defense, PDF.
• 
  “10 U.S. Code § 1107 – Notice of Use of an Investigational New Drug or a Drug Unapproved for Its Applied Use.” LII / Legal Information Institute.
  https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/1107.
  University.
• 
  October 27, 2004. DOE v. RUMSFELD | 341 F.Supp.2d 1 (2004) | supp2d11342. Leagle.com. United States District Court, District of Columbia.
  https://www.leagle.com/decision/2004342341fsupp2d11342.
  Judgment.
• 
  “Vaccine Definition: 383 Samples.” Law Insider.
  https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/vaccine.
  Reference.
• 
  September 24, 2021. Stew Peters with Anonymous Marine Officer. “Marine Officer Exposes Military Mandate: ‘Illegal, Immoral, Unconstitutional.’” Red Voice Media, The Stew Peters Show. Runtime of embedded video: 15:55.
  https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/09/marine-officer-exposes-military-mandate-illegal-immoral-unconstitutional/.
  News.
• 
  January 25, 2021. Michelle Hennessy. “Makers of Sophia the Robot Plan Mass Rollout amid Pandemic.” Reuters, sec. The Great Reboot. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hongkong-robot-idUSKBN29U03X.
  News.
• 
  November 10, 2022. Kevin Hughes. “Dr. Sam Sigoloff Tells Mike Adams: Pentagon’s Vaccine Mandate Was Legally Written but Applied in an ILLEGAL Manner.” Vaccine Damage News.
  https://www.vaccinedamage.news/2022-11-10-pentagon-vaccine-mandate-legally-written-illegally-applied.html.
  News.

Related:

• 
  August 27, 2021. Military Doctor: “The COVID Vaccine Program Has Killed More Young Active Duty People Than COVID Did.” HealthImpactNews. https://www.bitchute.com/video/e9qcPgzNEc0T/.
  Video.
• 
  September 1, 2021. Megan Redshaw. “Military Service Members With Natural Immunity File Lawsuit Against DOD, FDA, HHS Over COVID Vaccine Mandate • Children’s Health Defense.” Children’s Health Defense.
  https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/military-service-members-natural-immunity-lawsuit-dod-fda-hhs-covid-vaccine-mandate/.
  Activist.
• 
  October 11, 2021. Stew Peters with Karen Kingston. “RECEIPTS! Patent PROVES Vaxx Is Obedience Training Platform – THE FINAL VARIANT!” Red Voice Media, The Stew Peters Show.
  https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/10/receipts-patent-proves-vaxx-is-obedience-training-platform-the-final-variant/.
  News.
• 
  November 4, 2021. Pam Long. “7 Lawsuits Challenging COVID Vaccine Mandates for U.S. Military Members.” Children’s Health Defense.
  November 4, 2021. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/lawsuits-dod-covid-vaccine-mandates-us-military/.
  Activist.
• 
  November 16, 2021. Theresa Long. U.S. Army Lt. Colonel Theresa Long Exposes Nuremberg Code Violations in Military Vaccine Mandate. Rogue Nation Eternal Militia. Runtime: 14:57.
  https://www.bitchute.com/video/lX2BDK6OodvY/.
  Video.
  U.S. Army Lt. Colonel Theresa Long MD, MPH, FS states, “I believe the COVID vaccine is a greater threat to soldiers’ health and military readiness than the virus itself.”
• 
  June 11, 2022. Zach Heilman. “CDC Publishes Hidden Pfizer Document With An Admission That Proves Military Jab Mandates Illegal [VIDEO].” Red Voice Media. Runtime of embedded video: 2:49.
  https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/06/cdc-publishes-hidden-pfizer-document-with-an-admission-that-proves-military-jab-mandates-illegal-video/.
  News.

Injunctions were issued in the following cases:

Those fighting the military case may find useful some of the judge’s statements in these cases.  Actual links to rulings for the injunctions are included in all three case report posts.

• U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals tells OSHA to stand down on vaccine mandates
• Court issues injunction against federal CMS vaccine mandate.
• Court issues injunction against federal contractor vaccine mandate

No injunction was issued in the following, but important legal points were explained:

Currently, only the Comirnaty jab can be mandated.  Vials with the EUA labeling are NOT acceptable substitutes.

• Federal judge rejects DOD claim that Pfizer EUA and Comirnaty vaccines are ‘interchangeable’

See also, on this site:

• Fraud vitiates everything: UNITED STATES v. THROCKMORTON
• Military, Federal Employees and Civilian Contractors Sue Biden
• CDC director Dr. Walenksy admits vaccines cause increased risk of disease
• PCR test results create false alarm at a hospital
• A court case is won in Alberta, Canada
• Japan shares biodistribution study of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine
• Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE)
• 24,000 teenagers herded into stadium for jabs, 3 dead
• Pathological Institute in Reutlingen holds press conference
• Reports came in. Let’s crunch some numbers!
• FDA advisory committee voted 16 to 2 against boosters
• Over 500 service members file a suit against the government

There is a rumor going around that the approval is for the name change. After looking at the Approval Letter from the FDA’s Comirnaty and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine page, it does appear to be the licensing letter for the inoculation.  This is apparent in the terms used, which are different from those in an Emergency Use Authorization.  Compare the language used in the approval letter with those issued with the EUAs.  It looks like there are still some final details that are being worked out; otherwise, it appears that the Comirnaty inoculation is now fully approved for sale.  As of yet, the Comirnaty jab is not available in the US.  The Comirnaty/Pfizer-BioNTech Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine clearly states that pre-authorization Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and the Comirnaty vaccine are equivalent.  However, a recent judicial ruling claims that there is no legal equivalency, and they are not interchangeable.

• 
  October 20, 2021. “Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine [Pfizer-BioNTech].” US Food & Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download.
  Food & Drug Administration.
  This document has instructions for healthcare providers who are administering the vaccines.

However, another letter from August 23, 2021, admits that there are differences between the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and the Comirnaty vaccine, though they are not spelled out.

The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness.

The FDA is saying that the products are legally distinct.  They are not the same.  A case can be made that if the recipient did not receive a jab that did came out of a vial with a Comirnaty label, they did not receive the approved vaccine.

• 
  August 23, 2021. Denise M. Hinton. “FDA Letter to Pfizer.” US Food & Drug Administration.
  https://web.archive.org/web/20210823142034/https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download.
  Food & Drug Administration.
  The FDA has used this same URL to refer to various versions of this letter over time.  This is the first version of the letter saying that Comirnaty and Pfizer-BioNTech are legally distinct.
  Local copy.
• 
  August 24, 2021. Patrick Wood. “FDA/Media Shell Game: Pfizer ‘Vaccine’ Was Not Approved After All.” Technocracy News & Trends.
  https://www.technocracy.news/fda-media-shell-game-pfizer-vaccine-not-approved-after-all/.
  News.

The Approval Letter ends thus:

POST APPROVAL FEEDBACK MEETING

New biological products qualify for a post approval feedback meeting. Such meetings are used to discuss the quality of the application and to evaluate the communication process during drug development and marketing application review. The purpose is to learn from successful aspects of the review process and to identify areas that could benefit from improvement. If you would like to have such a meeting with us, please contact the Regulatory Project Manager for this application.

So, if we have concerns, we have been invited to share them.

Meanwhile, the trials have NOT been completed.  Furthermore, the trial has already been unblinded and is thus no longer a randomized control trial.  The Phase III trial is not scheduled for completion until May 2, 2023.  In other words, Comirnaty was approved prior to completion of required trials.

Page 14 of CCCA report: Pfizer did not follow established protocols

I believe that Dr. Jane Ruby in the interview below has properly assessed the situation.  In discussing the proposed Comirnaty package insert, she said:

This document is so paltry, I have to tell you, in my estimation, the FDA itself has violated its own federal [regulations].  In that situation, to me, this is an illegal approval, and the FDA is committing crimes.

— Dr. Jane Ruby

Compare the proposed Comirnaty package insert to inserts for other products, and the differences in quality of content become obvious.

Dr. Ruby then goes on to list some 20 alleged crimes that were committed just in the package insert.

Dr. Ruby offers a ray of hope: 50% of those inoculated received a placebo.

The ingredients list is due on September 7.

Sources:

• 
  September 3, 2021. “Pfizer-BioNTech/COMIRNATY Vaccine Is Still Under ‘STUDY’ Runs to Be Completed at Different Intervals Between 2022-2026.” Expanding Awareness Relations.
  https://www.expandingawarenessrelations.com/pfizer-biontech-comirnaty-vaccine-is-still-under-study-runs-to-be-completed-at-different-intervals-between-2022-2026/.
  Blog.
  This person did an excellent job of analyzing the documents.  It will still be a long time before all safety studies are completed.  Highly recommended.
• 
  August 23, 2021. “FDA Approves First COVID-19 Vaccine.” US Food & Drug Administration.
  https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine.
  Food & Drug Administration.
• 
  August 23, 2021. “Comirnaty and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions.” US Food & Drug Administration.
  https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/comirnaty-and-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions.
  Food & Drug Administration.
• 
  “Comirnaty and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.” US Food & Drug Administration.
  https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/comirnaty-and-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine.
  Food & Drug Administration.
  This page has links to official communications with Pfizer.
• 
  August 2021. “Comirnaty Package Insert.” US Food & Drug Administration.
  https://www.fda.gov/media/151707/download.
  Food & Drug Administration.
• 
  August 24, 2021. Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. “Comirnaty.” US Food & Drug Administration.
  https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/comirnaty.
  Food & Drug Administration.
  Comirnaty has its own page now as well.
• 
  August 23, 2021. Mary A. Malarkey and Marion F. Gruber. “August 23, 2021 Approval Letter.” US Food & Drug Administration.
  https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download.
  Food & Drug Administration.
• 
  August 23, 2021. Bruce Y. Lee. “Why ‘Comirnaty’ Is The New Name For Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccines, ‘Spikevax’ For Moderna.” Forbes.
  https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/08/23/why-comirnaty-is-the-new-name-for-pfizer-covid-19-vaccines-spikevax-for-moderna/.
  Magazine.
• 
  August 23, 2021. Stew Peters with Jane Ruby. “FDA Approval ILLEGAL! Doctor Reveals Pfizer Insert Proves Criminal Regulation Violations!” The Stew Peters Show, Red Voice Media. Runtime of embedded video: 19:23.
  https://www.redvoicemedia.com/video/2021/08/fda-approval-illegal-doctor-reveals-pfizer-insert-proves-criminal-regulation-violations/.
  News, Video.
• 
  August 25, 2021. Stew Peters with Karen Kingston. “Former Pfizer Employee: ‘Checkmate. Game Over. We WIN.’” Red Voice Media, The Stew Peters Show. Runtime of embedded video: 32:19.
  https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/08/former-pfizer-employee-checkmate-game-over-we-win/.
  News, Video.
  Links to documents mentioned in the video are in the description text on this page.
• 
  August 26, 2021. T. L. B. Staff. “Pfizer Has to Come Clean on Ingredients & Harms Within 14 Days.” Europe Reloaded. Runtime of embedded video: 32:19 [same video as above].
  https://www.europereloaded.com/pfizer-has-to-come-clean-on-ingredients-harms-within-14-days/.
  News, Video.
  This article is notes from the Stew Peters interview with Karen Kingston listed just above.
• 
  August 26, 2021. Nicholas Veniamin with Alan Fountain. Alan Fountain Discusses FDA, Pfizer, Sting Operation with Nicholas Veniamin. Nicholas Veniamin.
  https://www.bitchute.com/video/MsYRnuUDs7oF/.
  Video.
• 
  March 24, 2023. Jikkyleaks [@Jikkyleaks]. “@NarfGb @DoorlessCarp [KNOWINGLY] Remember Why They Called It Co-MiRNA-Ty? Https://Pubmed.Ncbi.Nlm.Nih.Gov/25515214/ Https://T.Co/Jtfi1ErlRK.” Tweet. Twitter.
  https://twitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1639149379838943232.
  Social Media.
• 
  “Comirnaty Pronunciation.”
  https://www.howtopronounce.com/comirnaty.
  Reference, Audio.

Related:

• 
  July 1, 2021. Piero Olliaro, Els Torreele, and Michel Vaillant. “COVID-19 Vaccine Efficacy and Effectiveness—the Elephant (Not) in the Room.” The Lancet Microbe 2 (7): e279–80.
  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00069-0.
  Research Journal.
• 
  June 1, 2021. Piero Olliaro. “What Does 95% COVID-19 Vaccine Efficacy Really Mean?” The Lancet Infectious Diseases 21 (6): 769.
  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00075-X.
  Research Journal.
• 
  December 16, 2021. The Pfizer Inoculations Do More Harm Than Good. CanadianCovidCareAlliance.
  https://rumble.com/vqx3kb-the-pfizer-inoculations-do-more-harm-than-good.html.
  Video.
• 
  December 16, 2021. “The Pfizer Inoculations for COVID-19: More Harm Than Good.” Canadian Covid Care Alliance.
  https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/The-COVID-19-Inoculations-More-Harm-Than-Good-REV-Dec-16-2021.pdf.
  Doctor Organization, Activist, PDF.
  #CCCA #MoreHarmThanGood
• 
  April 5, 2022. FDA APPROVALGATE: Fake Approval Scandal, Only EUA Is Available… All by Design! Tim Truth.
  https://www.bitchute.com/video/dXKMnh7ZQQ3o/.
  Video.
• 
  June 11, 2022. Zach Heilman. “CDC Publishes Hidden Pfizer Document With An Admission That Proves Military Jab Mandates Illegal [VIDEO].” Red Voice Media. Runtime of embedded video: 2:49.
  https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/06/cdc-publishes-hidden-pfizer-document-with-an-admission-that-proves-military-jab-mandates-illegal-video/.
  News.

See also, on this site:

• Tag: adverse events
• “COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans”
• Japan shares biodistribution study of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine
• Federal judge rejects DOD claim that Pfizer EUA and Comirnaty vaccines are ‘interchangeable’
• Pfizer admits: they will NEVER manufacture Comirnaty