The Nuremberg Code (German: Nürnberger Kodex) is part of a judicial ruling.  The Kodex has not been officially accepted as law by any nation or as official ethics guidelines by any association.  In the US, when preparing a legal case, refer to the National Research Act, which is legislation from the US Congress.  The National Research Act implements key provisions from the Nuremberg Code.

Following World War II, tribunals were held in Nuremberg, Germany.  Among those tried were the doctors in the Nazi concentration camps where prisoners were forced to participate in medical experiments.  The ten points of the Nuremberg Code were given in the section of the judges’ verdict against Nazi doctors entitled “Permissible Medical Experiments.”  The following is a summary.

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probably cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

For the detailed list, please see this article: Nuremberg Code

Sources:

• 
  United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. “Nuremberg Code.”
  https://www.ushmm.org/information/exhibitions/online-exhibitions/special-focus/doctors-trial/nuremberg-code.
  General Website Link.
• 
  “Nuremberg Code.” In Wikipedia.
  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nuremberg_Code.
  Reference.
• 
  November 13, 1997. Evelyne Shuster. “Fifty Years Later: The Significance of the Nuremberg Code.” New England Journal of Medicine 337 (20): 1436–40.
  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199711133372006.
  Research Journal.

Related:

• 
  October 20, 2021. “Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine [Pfizer-BioNTech].” US Food & Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download.
  Food & Drug Administration.
  This document has instructions for healthcare providers who are administering the vaccines.
• 
  October 19, 2005. “Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: UNESCO.” United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
  http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html.
  General Website Link.
  Article 3.2: “The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society.”
  And there is more in this document related to the issue at hand, all of which is also being violated in the current crisis.

See also, on this site:

• The National Research Act is signed into law.
• FDA approves Comirnaty COVID-19 Vaccine
• Federal judge rejects DOD claim that Pfizer EUA and Comirnaty vaccines are ‘interchangeable’

Ivermectin is an anti-parasite medication. Ivermectin is used to treat infections in the body that are caused by certain parasites.

— The Vigilant Fox

Sources:

• 
  November 22, 1996. US Food & Drug Administration. “Drugs@FDA: FDA-Approved Drugs: STROMECTOL.”
  https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=overview.process&ApplNo=050742.
  Food & Drug Administration.
• 
  March 3, 2005. US Food & Drug Administration. “Drug Approval Package: Stromectol (Ivermectin) NDA# 050742s001.”
  https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/98/50-742s001_Stromectol.cfm.
  Food & Drug Administration.
• 
  Drugs.Com. “Ivermectin Uses, Side Effects & Warnings.”
  https://www.drugs.com/ivermectin.html.
  Reference.
• 
  October 1, 1980. John C. Chabala, Helmut Mrozik, Richard L. Tolman, Philip Eskola, Aino Lusi, Louis H. Peterson, Mary F. Woods, Michael H. Fisher, and William C. Campbell. “Ivermectin, a New Broad-Spectrum Antiparasitic Agent.” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 23 (10): 1134–36.
  https://doi.org/10.1021/jm00184a014.
  Research Journal.
• 
  October 8, 2012. Trinity College Dublin. Prof William Campbell – The Story of Ivermectin. Runtime: 43:05.
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t96_xbpXH-M.
  Video, Expert.
• 
  January 2021. Niti Mittal, and Rakesh Mittal. “Inhaled Route and Anti-Inflammatory Action of Ivermectin: Do They Hold Promise in Fighting against COVID-19?” Medical Hypotheses 146 (January): 110364.
  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110364.
  Research Journal.
• 
  April 1, 2021. James J. DiNicolantonio, Jorge Barroso-Aranda, and Mark F. McCarty. “Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Ivermectin in Late-Stage COVID-19 May Reflect Activation of Systemic Glycine Receptors.” Open Heart 8 (1): e001655.
  https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2021-001655.
  Research Journal.
• 
  May/June 2021. Pierre Kory, Gianfranco Umberto Meduri, Joseph Varon, Jose Iglesias, and Paul E. Marik. “Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19.” American Journal of Therapeutics 28 (3): e299.
  https://doi.org/10.1097/MJT.0000000000001377.
  Research Journal.
• 
  August 15, 2021. Must Know COVID, IVERMECTIN and VACCINE Information Full Feature Documentary. JoshPaulGaming.
  https://rumble.com/vl6p8v-must-know-covid-ivermectin-and-vaccine-information-full-feature-documentary.html.
  Video.
• 
  December 21, 2021. Asiya Kamber Zaidi, and Puya Dehgani-Mobaraki. “The Mechanisms of Action of Ivermectin against SARS-CoV-2—an Extensive Review.” The Journal of Antibiotics 75 (2): 60–71.
  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41429-021-00491-6.
  Research Journal.
• 
  April 6, 2023. Paul Marik. A Remarkable Drug: “If You Had to Design a Drug for COVID, It Would Look Exactly Like Ivermectin.” The Vigilant Fox. Runtime: 2:09.
  https://rumble.com/v2gnsbm-a-remarkable-drug-if-you-had-to-design-a-drug-for-covid-it-would-look-exact.html.
  Video, Expert.
• 
  April 18, 2023. The Vigilant Fox [@VigilantFox]. “A Remarkable Drug: ‘If You Had to Design a Drug for COVID, It Would Look Exactly Like Ivermectin’ @drpaulmarik1 Explains Why: • Antiviral – Works against a Host of RNA Viruses • Very Powerful Anti-Inflammatory Drug • Stimulates a Process Called Autophagy, a Healing Mechanism… Https://T.Co/96Vsq3iFYN.” Tweet. Twitter.
  https://twitter.com/VigilantFox/status/1648300273415200777.
  Social Media, Expert.

Why does the world need the JMIR? The Internet – and more specifically, the World-Wide-Web – has an impact on many areas of medicine – broadly we can divide them into “clinical information and telemedicine”, “medical education and information exchange” and “consumer health informatics”:

• First, Internet protocols are used for clinical information and communication. In the future, Internet technology will be the platform for many telemedical applications.
• Second, the Internet revolutionizes the gathering, access and dissemination of non-clinical information in medicine: Bibliographic and factual databases are now world-wide accessible via graphical user interfaces, epidemiological and public health information can be gathered using the Internet, and increasingly the Internet is used for interactive medical education applications.
• Third, the Internet plays an important role for consumer health education, health promotion and teleprevention. (As an aside, it should be emphasized that “health education” on the Internet goes beyond the traditional model of health education, where a medical professional teaches the patient: On the Internet, much “health education” is done “consumer-to-consumer” by means of patient self support groups organizing in cyberspace. These patient-to-patient interchanges are becoming an important part of healthcare and are redefining the traditional model of preventive medicine and health promotion).

Sources:

• 
  JMIR Publications.
  https://jmirpublications.com/.
  Research Journal.
• 
  August 11, 1999. Gunther Eysenbach. “Welcome to the Journal of Medical Internet Research.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 1 (1): e649.
  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1.1.e5.
  Research Journal.
• 
  August 28, 2001. G. Eysenbach. “Journal of Medical Internet Research Is Now Indexed in Medline.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 3 (3): e843.
  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3.3.e25.
  Research Journal.
• 
  January 28, 2021. “Gunther Eysenbach.” In Wikipedia.
  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gunther_Eysenbach.
  Reference.
• 
  “Gunther Eysenbach.” Google Scholar.
  http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=UjKmMQcAAAAJ&hl=en.
  Reference.
• 
  “JMIR Publications – Crunchbase Company Profile & Funding.” Crunchbase.
  https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/jmir-publications.
  Financial.

Related:

• 
  TrendMD.
  https://trendmd.com/.
  Business.
• 
  “TrendMD – Crunchbase Company Profile & Funding.” Crunchbase.
  https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/trendmd.
  Financial.

Later, some would try to claim that the COVID-19 outbreak was caused by introduction of 5G frequencies and not a virus.

Sources:

• 
  April 10, 2001. Shigeaki (Shey) Hakusui. “Fixed Wireless Communications at 60GHz Unique Oxygen Absorption Properties.” RF Globalnet.
  https://www.rfglobalnet.com/doc/fixed-wireless-communications-at-60ghz-unique-0001.
  Research Journal.
• 
  May 2005. M.Yu. Tretyakov, M.A. Koshelev, V.V. Dorovskikh, D.S. Makarov, and P.W. Rosenkranz. “60-GHz Oxygen Band: Precise Broadening and Central Frequencies of Fine-Structure Lines, Absolute Absorption Profile at Atmospheric Pressure, and Revision of Mixing Coefficients.” Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 231 (1): 1–14.
  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jms.2004.11.011.
  Research Journal.

The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act is prepared by The Center for Law and the Public’s Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]

The MSEHPA (Model State Emergency Health Powers Act) which was passed by many states in 2002, included provisions that would allow state health officials to use the state militia to:

Take control of all roads leading into and out of cities and states;

Seize homes, cars, telephones, computers, food, fuel, clothing, firearms and alcoholic beverages for their own use (and not be held liable if these actions result in the destruction of  personal property);

Arrest, imprison and forcibly examine, vaccinate and medicate citizens without consent (and not be held liable if these actions result in your death or injury).

— ce399

Fortunately for the People, the Supremacy Clause in the U.S. Constitution declares that where federal and state laws conflict, federal law supersedes state law.

Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause.  It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions. It prohibits states from interfering with the federal government’s exercise of its constitutional powers, and from assuming any functions that are exclusively entrusted to the federal government. It does not, however, allow the federal government to review or veto state laws before they take effect.

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.
— US Constitution, Article VI, paragraph 2

The National Research Act (also known as The Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects or The Common Rule) is federal law.  The Emergency Health Powers Acts are state laws.  Therefore, none of the Emergency Health Powers Acts can violate the protections provided in the National Research Act.  Please refer to the article about the National Research Act for further details.

Sources:

• 
  December 21, 2001. Lawrence O Gostin. The Center for Law and the Public’s Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities. “The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act.”
  https://www.aapsonline.org/legis/msehpa2.pdf.
  University, PDF.
• 
  August 7, 2002. Lawrence O. Gostin, Jason W. Sapsin, Stephen P. Teret, Scott Burris, Julie Samia Mair, James G. Hodge, and Jon S. Vernick. “The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act: Planning for and Response to Bioterrorism and Naturally Occurring Infectious Diseases.” JAMA 288 (5): 622–28.
  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.5.622.
  Research Journal.
• 
  American Civil Liberties Union. “Model State Emergency Health Powers Act.”
  https://www.aclu.org/other/model-state-emergency-health-powers-act.
  Activist.
• 
  July 22, 2021. National Conference of State Legislatures. “Legislative Oversight of Emergency Executive Powers.”
  https://www.ncsl.org/research/about-state-legislatures/legislative-oversight-of-executive-orders.aspx.
  Collaboration.
• 
  September 1, 2010. Mathew Foley. “The Turning Point Model State Public Health Act: Emergency Public Health Law versus Civil Liberties.” AMA Journal of Ethics 12 (9): 735–38.
  https://doi.org/10.1001/virtualmentor.2010.12.9.pfor2-1009.
  Research Journal.
• 
  April 21, 2003. Edward P. Richards and Katharine C. Rathbun. “Review of the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act.” LSU Law Center Climate Change Law and Policy Project.
  https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/blaw/bt/MSEHPA_review.htm.
  University.
• 
  “Model State Emergency Health Powers Act.” In Wikipedia.
  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Model_State_Emergency_Health_Powers_Act.
  Reference.
• 
  June 10, 2002. Sue Blevins. “The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act: An Assault on Civil Liberties in the Name of Homeland Security.” The Heritage Foundation.
  https://www.heritage.org/homeland-security/report/the-model-state-emergency-health-powers-act-assault-civil-liberties-the.
  Blog.
• 
  July 15, 2009. “Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (Swine Flu Vaccination Alert).” Ce399 | Research Archive.
  https://ce399.typepad.com/weblog/2009/07/mode.html.
  Blog.
• 
  October 6, 2009. Joe Hashmall. “Supremacy Clause.” LII / Legal Information Institute.
  https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/supremacy_clause.
  University.
• 
  September 17, 1787. “U.S. Constitution, Article VI.” LII / Legal Information Institute.
  https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlevi.
  University.

See also, on this site:

• The National Research Act is signed into law.
• How Trump’s vaccines prevent the Great Reset and save humanity
• The governor of New Mexico invokes a state Emergency Health Powers Act

Legislation by state.

• 
  September 12, 2009. Jenna L. Minegar. “50 States – Government Health Powers.” Citizens’ Council on Health Care.
  https://www.cchfreedom.org/publichealthpowers/50-States-URL-list.pdf.
  PDF.
• 
  April 16, 2002. “Protecting Democracy: America’s Legislatures Respond.” National Conference of State Legislatures.
  https://www.ncsl.org/Portals/1/documents/press/2002/5health.pdf.
  Collaboration, PDF.

The following map is provided as a research hint.

This map is probably good as of sometime in 2006.
More states may have passed an Emergency Health Powers Act by now.
http://www.rwjf.org/files/publications/annual/2006/images/chart-publichealth.gif

This list below of links by state is nowhere near complete at this time.  Emergency Health Powers Acts have been enacted in at least 34 states.  Eventually, I will get more of this filled in.

Alabama

Alaska

Arizona

Arkansas

California

• 
  March 15, 2019. Peter (CDPH-OLS) Baldridge. “Public Health and Medical Emergency Powers,” 27.
  https://emsa.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/71/2019/03/New-EOM-Public-Health-and-Medical-Emergency-Powers-3-15-2019-002.pdf.
  Government, PDF.

Colorado

Connecticut

Delaware

Florida

Georgia

Hawaii

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maine

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Mississippi

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

New Hampshire

New Jersey

• 
  September 14, 2005. New Jersey Legislature. “P.L.2005, c.222 (S2085 4R).”
  https://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2004/Bills/PL05/222_.HTM.
  Government.
• 
  March 24, 2006. “Regulation 61-112: Implementation of Emergency Health Powers Act.”
  https://scdhec.gov/sites/default/files/media/document/R.61-112.pdf.
  Government, PDF.

New Mexico

New York

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

South Carolina

• 
  “Code of Laws – Title 44 – Chapter 4 – Emergency Health Powers.” South Carolina Legislature.
  https://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t44c004.php.
  Government.

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Vermont

Virginia

Washington

West Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming

Infodemiology can be defined as the science of distribution and determinants of information in an electronic medium, specifically the Internet, or in a population, with the ultimate aim to inform public health and public policy. Infodemiology data can be collected and analyzed in near real time. Examples for infodemiology applications include: the analysis of queries from Internet search engines to predict disease outbreaks (eg. influenza); monitoring peoples’ status updates on microblogs such as Twitter for syndromic surveillance; detecting and quantifying disparities in health information availability; identifying and monitoring of public health relevant publications on the Internet (eg. anti-vaccination sites, but also news articles or expert-curated outbreak reports); automated tools to measure information diffusion and knowledge translation, and tracking the effectiveness of health marketing campaigns. Moreover, analyzing how people search and navigate the Internet for health-related information, as well as how they communicate and share this information, can provide valuable insights into health-related behavior of populations.

Sources:

• 
  December 15, 2002. Gunther Eysenbach. “Infodemiology: The Epidemiology of (Mis)Information.” The American Journal of Medicine 113 (9): 763–65.
  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(02)01473-0.
  Research Journal.
• 
  March 27, 2009. Gunther Eysenbach. “Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Framework for an Emerging Set of Public Health Informatics Methods to Analyze Search, Communication and Publication Behavior on the Internet.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 11 (1): e1157.
  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1157.
  Research Journal.
• 
  January 17, 2014. Hua Gu, Bin Chen, Honghong Zhu, Tao Jiang, Xinyi Wang, Lei Chen, Zhenggang Jiang, Dawei Zheng, and Jianmin Jiang. “Importance of Internet Surveillance in Public Health Emergency Control and Prevention: Evidence From a Digital Epidemiologic Study During Avian Influenza A H7N9 Outbreaks.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 16 (1): e2911.
  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2911.
  Research Journal.
• 
  March 4, 2013. Julie M. Robillard, Louise Whiteley, Thomas Wade Johnson, Jonathan Lim, Wyeth W. Wasserman, and Judy Illes. “Utilizing Social Media to Study Information-Seeking and Ethical Issues in Gene Therapy.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 15 (3): e2313.
  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2313.
  Research Journal.
• 
  “Infodemiology.” In Wikipedia.
  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Infodemiology.
  Reference.

See also, on this site:

• Gunther Eysenbach founds the Journal of Medical Internet Research

2004

Andre and Kostya frequently held ‘Friday night experiments’ – sessions where they would try out experimental science that wasn’t necessarily linked to their day jobs.

One Friday, the two scientists removed some flakes from a lump of bulk graphite with sticky tape. They noticed some flakes were thinner than others. By separating the graphite fragments repeatedly, they managed to create flakes that were just one atom thick. Their experiment had led to graphene being isolated for the very first time.

Because the graphene flakes are only just one atom thick, they are considered to be two-dimensional crystals.  Graphene thus became the first known 2D crystal.  Other 2D crystal types have been developed since the initial discovery of graphene.

Sources:

• 
  April 11, 2015. The University of Manchester – The home of graphene. Graphene Explained. Runtime: 2:47.
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cDh4B6knKw&t=167s.
  Video, University.
• 
  “Discovery of Graphene.” Graphene – The University of Manchester.
  https://www.graphene.manchester.ac.uk/learn/discovery-of-graphene/.
  University.
• 
  “The Nobel Prize in Physics 2010.” Nobel Prize.
  https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2010/summary/.
  Nobel Prize.
  The Nobel Prize in Physics 2010 was awarded jointly to Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov “for groundbreaking experiments regarding the two-dimensional material graphene”.
• 
  October 22, 2004. K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov. “Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 306 (5696): 666–69.
  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102896.
  Research Journal.
• 
  March 2007. A. K. Geim, and K. S. Novoselov. “The Rise of Graphene.” Nature Materials 6 (3): 183–91.
  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1849.
  Research Journal.
• 
  “Andre Geim.” In Wikipedia.
  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andre_Geim.
  Reference.
• 
  “Konstantin Novoselov.” In Wikipedia.
  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Konstantin_Novoselov.
  Reference.

See also, on this site:

• Canada recalls face masks containing graphene
• Graphene found in COVID-19 vaccine

Related:

• 
  “Irina Grigorieva (Academic).” In Wikipedia.
  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Irina_Grigorieva_(academic).
  Reference.
• 
  January 2010. Juhan Kim, Soo Bong Heo, Geun Hoi Gu, and Jung Sang Suh. “Fabrication of Graphene Flakes Composed of Multi-Layer Graphene Sheets Using a Thermal Plasma Jet System.” Nanotechnology 21 (9): 095601.
  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/21/9/095601.
  Research Journal.
• 
  December 30, 2013. “Graphene-Based Nano-Antennas May Enable Nanonetworks, Terabits-per-Second Wireless Communications « Kurzweil.” Kurzweil | Tracking the Acceleration of Intelligence.
  https://www.kurzweilai.net/graphene-based-nano-antennas-may-enable-nanonetworks-terabits-per-second-wireless-communications.
  Blog.
• 
  January 28, 2008. Bethany Halford. “Graphene Ribbons.” Chemical & Engineering News.
  https://cen.acs.org/articles/86/i4/Graphene-Ribbons.html.
  Research Journal.
• 
  October 5, 2010. “Geim Becomes First Nobel & Ig Nobel Winner.” Improbable Research.
  https://www.improbable.com/2010/10/05/geim-becomes-first-nobel-ig-nobel-winner/.
  Blog.
  The Ig Nobel Prize is a spoof prize.  Andre Geim won the Ig Nobel Prize for levitating a frog.
• 
  July 1997. M. V. Berry, and A. K. Geim. “Of Flying Frogs and Levitrons.” European Journal of Physics 18 (4): 307–13.
  https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/18/4/012.
  Research Journal.

This article is in the NIH database.  Thus we see that a potential treatment for COVID-19 was already known at the time SARS-CoV-2 was released.

Source:

• 
  August 22, 2005. Martin J. Vincent, Eric Bergeron, Suzanne Benjannet, Bobbie R. Erickson, Pierre E. Rollin, Thomas G. Ksiazek, Nabil G. Seidah, and Stuart T. Nichol. “Chloroquine Is a Potent Inhibitor of SARS Coronavirus Infection and Spread.” Virology Journal 2 (1): 69.
  https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-2-69.
  Research Journal.

See also, on this site:

• Dr. Vladimir Zelenko publishes his COVID-19 treatment protocol.
• LifeSiteNews interviews Dr. Zelenko
• The United States Senate holds Hearing on COVID-19 Outpatient Treatment.
• Rep. Nancy Pelosi explains the “Wrap Up” Smear.

Grant Final Report: Review of Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) determines that fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Even if we assume that the COVID-19 situation has created increased awareness of VAERS, we can assume that adverse reactions are still grossly underreported. If nothing has changed, this means that statistics derived from VAERS can be multiplied by 100.

In addition to being grossly underreported, it appears that the data in VAERS may not be entirely up to date.  It appears that the CDC is behind in their reporting of adverse reactions.

According to Dr. David Martin, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 requires that the VAERS database be maintained accurately.  This is a statutory requirement for maintaining immunity.

It is important to note that VAERS has a very significant reporting backlog. Over 150,000 adverse events have been reported, but not yet included in the publicly available database. In many cases, there is a three month delay.

— Good King Elliot (@GoodKingElliot) June 23, 2021

The following shows how VAERS data compares with the Pfizer clinical trial data.

Page 35 of CCCA report: Roll Out Surveillance: You Don’t Find What You Don’t Look For
Left side chart is the Pfizer clinical trials. Right side chart is the passive surveillance of the general population post-rollout.

Sources:

• 
  September 30, 2010. Ross Lazarus, Michael Klompas, and Steve Bernstein. “Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS).” Grant Final Report, Grant ID: R18 HS 017045. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
  https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf.
  Government, PDF.
• 
  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).”
  https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html.
  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
• 
  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). “Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).”
  https://vaers.hhs.gov/.
  Government.
• 
  “VAERS COVID Vaccine Data.” OpenVAERS.
  https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data.
  Statistics.
• 
  June 23, 2021. Good King Elliot. “@RWMaloneMD It Is Important to Note That VAERS Has a Very Significant Reporting Backlog. Over 150,000 Adverse Events Have Been Reported, but Not yet Included in the Publicly Available Database. In Many Cases, There Is a Three Month Delay.” Tweet. @GoodKingElliot (blog).
  https://twitter.com/GoodKingElliot/status/1407727432166223872.
  Social Media.
• 
  December 23, 2021. Seth Holehouse with David Martin. Why Does Trump Keep Promoting the Vaccine? Man in America. Runtime: 1:06:35.
  https://rumble.com/vrahql-why-is-trump-promoting-the-vaccine.html.
  Video, Expert.

Related:

• 
  U.S. Health Resources & Services Administration. “Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP).”
  https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp.
  Government.
• 
  August 26, 2015. Tom T. Shimabukuro, Michael Nguyen, David Martin, and Frank DeStefano. “Safety Monitoring in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).” Vaccine 33 (36): 4398–4405.
  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.07.035.
  Research Journal.
• 
  December 16, 2021. The Pfizer Inoculations Do More Harm Than Good. CanadianCovidCareAlliance.
  https://rumble.com/vqx3kb-the-pfizer-inoculations-do-more-harm-than-good.html.
  Video.
• 
  December 16, 2021. “The Pfizer Inoculations for COVID-19: More Harm Than Good.” Canadian Covid Care Alliance.
  https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/The-COVID-19-Inoculations-More-Harm-Than-Good-REV-Dec-16-2021.pdf.
  Doctor Organization, Activist, PDF.
  #CCCA #MoreHarmThanGood

See also, on this site:

• National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (USA)

Peter Daszak is a good showman and salesman, but he also has ties to gain-of-function research.  His name has appeared on at least one research paper in conjunction with the “Bat Lady” of the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Sources:

• 
  Peter Daszak. “What Diseases Come from Animals?” TEDMED. Runtime of embedded video: 29:05.
  https://www.tedmed.com/talks/show?id=7047.
  Presentation, Video.
• 
  October 27, 2010. Peter Daszak. “Animal-Borne Diseases? EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak Cautions TEDMED Conference Attendees to ‘Be Afraid…Be Very Afraid.’” Cision PR Newswire.
  https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/animal-borne-diseases-ecohealth-alliance-president-peter-daszak-cautions-tedmed-conference-attendees-to-be-afraidbe-very-afraid-105918313.html.
  News.

Related:

• 
  November 30, 2017. Ben Hu, Lei-Ping Zeng, Xing-Lou Yang, Xing-Yi Ge, Wei Zhang, Bei Li, Jia-Zheng Xie, Xu-Rui Shen, Yun-Zhi Zhang, Ning Wang, Dong-Sheng Luo, Xiao-Shuang Zheng, Mei-Niang Wang, Peter Daszak, Lin-Fa Wang, Jie Cui, and Zheng-Li Shi. “Discovery of a Rich Gene Pool of Bat SARS-Related Coronaviruses Provides New Insights into the Origin of SARS Coronavirus.” PLOS Pathogens 13 (11): e1006698.
  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006698.
  Research Journal.

See also, on this site:

• Peter Daszak addresses workshop
• Peter Daszak mentions coronavirus research in video