Uncategorized – Pandemic Timeline https://pandemictimeline.com Chronological Sequence of Events Sat, 26 Oct 2024 17:31:35 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 https://pandemictimeline.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Covid-150x150.ico Uncategorized – Pandemic Timeline https://pandemictimeline.com 32 32 Charles Richet wins Nobel Prize for his research on anaphylaxis https://pandemictimeline.com/1913/12/charles-richet-wins-nobel-prize-for-his-research-on-anaphylaxis/ Thu, 11 Dec 1913 00:00:23 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=7073 Phylaxis, a word seldom used, stands in the Greek for protection. Anaphylaxis will thus stand for the opposite. Anaphylaxis, from its Greek etymological source, therefore means that state of an organism in which it is rendered hypersensitive, instead of being protected. … During a cruise on the yacht of Prince Albert of Monaco, the Prince advised me…

Read more →

]]>

Charles Robert Richet (1850-1935)

Phylaxis, a word seldom used, stands in the Greek for protection. Anaphylaxis will thus stand for the opposite. Anaphylaxis, from its Greek etymological source, therefore means that state of an organism in which it is rendered hypersensitive, instead of being protected.

…

During a cruise on the yacht of Prince Albert of Monaco, the Prince advised me to study Physalia poison, together with our friends Georges Richard and Paul Portier. We found that it is easily dissolved in glycerol and that by injecting this glycerol solution, the symptoms of Physalia poisoning are reproduced.

When I came back to France and had no more Physalia to study, I hit upon the idea of making a comparative study of the tentacles of the Actinia (Actinia eqnina, Anemone sulcata) which can be obtained in large quantities, for Actinia abound on all the rocky shores of Europe.

Now Actinia tentacles, treated with glycerol, give off their poison into the glycerol and the extract is toxic. I therefore set about finding how toxic it was, with Portier. This was quite difficult to do, as it is a slowly acting poison and three or four days must elapse before it can be known if the dose be fatal or not. I was using a solution of one kilo of glycerol to one kilo of tentacles. The lethal dose was of the order of 0.1 liquid per kilo live weight of subject.

But certain of the dogs survived, either because the dose was not strong enough or for some other reason. At the end of two, three or four weeks, as they seemed normal, I made use of them for a new experiment.

An unexpected phenomenon arose, which we thought extraordinary. A dog when injected previously even with the smallest dose, say of 0.005 liquid per kilo, immediately showed serious symptoms : vomiting, blood diarrhoea, syncope, unconsciousness, asphyxia and death. This basic experiment was repeated at various times and by 1902 we were able to state three main factors which are the corner-stone of the history of anaphylaxis: (1) a subject that had a previous injection is far more sensitive than a new subject; (2) that the symptoms characteristic of the second injection, namely swift and total depression of the nervous system, do not in any way resemble the symptoms characterizing the first injection; (3) a three or four week period must elapse before the anaphylactic state results. This is the period of incubation.

Once these first factors in anaphylaxis were well grounded, the field opened right up, thanks to the skilled and fruitful research of many investigators.

In 1903 Arthus, in Lausanne, showed that a first intravenous injection of serum on a rabbit causes anaphylaxis, i.e. three weeks after the first injection the rabbit is hypersensitive to the second injection. The phenomenon of anaphylaxis was becoming of general application. Instead of applying only to toxins and toxalbumins, it held good for all proteins, whether toxic at the first injection or not.

Two years later Rosenau and Anderson, two American physiologists, demonstrated in a noteworthy piece of work that the phenomenon of anaphylaxis occurs after every injection of serum, even when the injection is minute, for example of 0.00001 ml which is an infinitely small amount but nevertheless sufficient to anaphylactize an animal. They quoted examples of anaphylaxis from all organic liquids: milk, serum, egg, muscle extract. They specified the reaction and clearly showed that of all the subjects, the guinea-pig appeared the most sensitive in anaphylactic terms.

…

But it is a much harder task to state when the anaphylactic period has actually passed. Most writers incline to the view (and I myself would think them correct in their view) that the anaphylactic state never passes. In other words, once a subject has been anaphylactized and consequently modified in his chemical constitution, then the subject can never go back to his former state. Return to normal is not possible. Subjects have been known who even after four years from the date of the first serum injection, were still sensitive to the unleashing reaction.

Let me add in passing that it is an extraordinary phenomenon that so insignificant a quantity of poison can modify the organism to the extent that the succeeding days down long years can not eradicate this indelible modification. Unfortunately minute researches on just this point are still lacking. But it certainly looks as though considerable differences will be found in the duration of anaphylactization.

Anaphylactic symptoms also vary to a great extent, although the differences are marked rather according to the nature of the experimental animal than according to the nature of the poison used. It is indeed worthy of note to find that the phenomena are constant, whatever the poison used.

This phenomenon is similar to the Antibody-Dependent Enhancement that several experts expected when the COVID jabs rolled out and that we are now seeing.  This explains why we are seeing more adverse events with the COVID-19 jabs after the second dose than we see with the first dose.  Those who have had flu vaccines likewise tend to be more sensitive to the COVID-19 jabs.

Given that we already see an increase in adverse events following a second dose of the jabs, I would expect that each booster will have a progressively worse result.

Is anaphylaxis an intended result of the COVID-19 jabs?  Why did most manufacturers choose a two-dose protocol with a period of incubation in between?  What is the true purpose of these jabs?

So how do we relate this to now?

The agency revealed in a report Wednesday that there had been 21 anaphylaxis cases out of 1.9 million people who had received the first dose of the Pfizer vaccine.

Seventeen of the 21 people had a documented history of allergies or allergic reactions, seven of whom previously experienced anaphylaxis, Messonnier said.

But the rate is higher than among people who have received the flu shot.

Flu vaccines cause anaphylaxis in an estimated 1.3 people per 1 million recipients, while around 11.1 Pfizer recipients out of every million had the reaction, the CDC estimates.

— New York Post

These are first dose statistics.

Source:

Related:

See also, on this site:

]]> Robert Maxwell purchases Butterworth-Springer https://pandemictimeline.com/1951/05/robert-maxwell-purchases-butterworth-springer/ Tue, 01 May 1951 00:01:08 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=1662 Sometime in May 1951. Publishers of science can make profits far higher than most businesses because they are given their raw material (scientific studies) for free and yet that material is “must have” for customers, particularly academic libraries. What’s more success in academia depends on publishing in the journals owned by those publishers. This combination…

Read more →

]]>

Sometime in May 1951.

Publishers of science can make profits far higher than most businesses because they are given their raw material (scientific studies) for free and yet that material is “must have” for customers, particularly academic libraries. What’s more success in academia depends on publishing in the journals owned by those publishers. This combination leads to science publishing being close to the Holy Grail of the greedy—“a licence to print money, a free lunch, or a magic money tree.” One of the first people to discover this Holy Grail was a man of great talent (or at least bombast) and few moral qualms: Robert Maxwell.

— The Origins of Exploitative Science Publishing

At the peak of his business empire, his net worth was $1.9 billion. After his death, his business empire was nearly $4 billion in debt. His companies included the Mirror group of newspapers, Maxwell Communications, Nimbus Records, P.F. Collier, Official Airline Guide, Prentice Hall Information Services, Macmillan publishing, the Berlitz language schools, and Pergamon Press, a technical publishing company.

⋮

In 1946, Robert Maxwell met Dr Ferdinand Springer, owner of the German Springer Verlag, Europe’s leading pre-war scientific publisher which was under financial burden due to the war. While still working at the Control Commission, Robert Maxwell became the director of a firm that offered distribution for Springers journals across Europe and the United States. In 1948, Butterworth Scientific Publications failed to take off and a joint company was created with its partner Springer Verlag, the new company was called Butterworth-Springer. In 1951, Robert Maxwell bought three-quarters of Butterworth-Springer and the remaining quarter was held by the former Springer Verlag scientific editor Paul Rosbaud. They changed the name of the company to Pergamon Press and rapidly built it into a major publishing house.

— Spooky Connections

There followed protracted negotiations organized by Vanden Heuvel and, in May 1951, Butterworth agreed to sell its interest to Maxwell for £13,000. Agreeing also to a change of name to Pergamon Press, Butterworth set aside a considerable debt of £10,000.

As his official biographer, Joe Haines, acknowledge, this was ‘more money than Maxwell possessed at that moment, so he borrowed. He first went to Sir Charles Hambro.’ Who introduced Maxwell to Hambro varies with the different accounts. Haines says it was via the Board of Trade (BoT); Maxwell said it was Whitlock; Betty Maxwell claims it was Vanden Heuvel, Hambro’s business ‘fixer’. Whoever it was, the meeting gave rise to a City legend that Hambro had been so impressed by the forward-looking Maxwell and sufficiently persuaded of his business acumen that he ordered the chief cashier to give Maxwell a cheque book with authority to draw cheques up to a total of £25,000. In fact, the legend was no more than a cover story. The meeting certainly took place, but the matter of money had already been fixed by MI6.

— MI6: Inside the Covert World of Her Majesty’s Secret Intelligence Service, p. 141

Robert Maxwell was born as Ján Ludvík Hyman Binyamin Hoch on June 10, 1923 in Slatinské Doly in what was then Czechoslovakia [and is now Solotvyno, Ukraine]. His parents were poor Yiddish-speaking Orthodox Jews named Hannah and Mechel. Maxwell was one of seven siblings. During World War II, most of the family was murdered during Nazi occupation; Maxwell, however, had previously fled to France.

— Robert Maxwell Net Worth

Here’s one that I just discovered.  ‘Cause when you talk about science, people say, “Well, that might be true of politics, but that can’t be true of science because, I mean, we’ve got Ph.D. students, we’ve got university think tanks, we’ve got all these publications.  How can they all be lying?  Well, let me just tell ya.  Here’s a little fun factoid.  After World War II …  I’ll just tell you the punch line, and then I’ll tell you how I got there.  The intelligence services or the service created with Mossad, CIA, and MI6, they own all scientific and medical publishing.

What?  Here’s how I discovered that.  After World War II, Charles Dalton Darwin—he’s the grandson of Charles Darwin the explorer and Alexander Flemming who discovered penicillin.  They got together and went to the British government.  They said, “Hey, look what happened in World War II, the science.  We would have been a lot better off had we been able to really communicate well.  We need better scientific publishing around the world.”

And the British government, without consulting anybody, said, “No problem.  We can do that.”  And boom!  Why could they do that?  Because MI6 owned Buttersworth.  MI6, being their equivalent of CIA.  Buttersworth, the biggest medical scientific journal in the world.  And it’s owned by their intelligence spy agency?  Then, they combined it with the Germans.

And now, guess who they made—you can’t make this one up—the first editor-in-chief of the biggest now scientific publishing house in the world was Robert Maxwell.  Robert Maxwell, who was provably a double agent.  He worked for the British against the Germans in World War II.  He was buried on the Mount of Olives, so he was a Mossad agent.  But the claim to infamy is his daughter is Ghislaine Maxwell, pedophile consort of Jefferey Eppstein.  It’s a cute club and we’re not in it.  You have to control the narrative.  You have to control publishing if you’re going to pull off The Truman Show of science, and they’ve done that.

It’s not just about [parasites as cause of cancer].  It’s about the PCR test.  In The Truman Show, when he starts he’s in a false reality, this light falls from what he thinks is the sky, and it’s a stage light, almost hits him.  He goes, “What?  How can this be real?”

For me, that light was the PCR test.  And it’s not just that the overcycled it.  It’s that when I ran those sequences on the PCR test through the index of genetic, where these things come from, it didn’t show up SARS-COV-2, the virus they claimed.  It showed up human genomes.  Homo sapiens.  There were 18 tests.  I ran 12 of them, and then I gave up, and then I said, “Dear God!  They’re testing to our own human genome.”

— Dr. Lee Merritt

Sources:

]]> Government announces first vaccine against polio https://pandemictimeline.com/1955/04/government-announces-first-vaccine-against-polio/ Tue, 12 Apr 1955 00:00:55 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=3893 On April 12, 1955 the government announced the first vaccine to protect kids against polio. Within days, labs had made thousands of lots of the vaccine. Batches made by one company, Cutter Labs, accidentally contained live polio virus and it caused an outbreak. Source:

Read more →

]]>

On April 12, 1955 the government announced the first vaccine to protect kids against polio. Within days, labs had made thousands of lots of the vaccine. Batches made by one company, Cutter Labs, accidentally contained live polio virus and it caused an outbreak.

Source:

]]> Aldous Huxley gives a speech https://pandemictimeline.com/1962/03/aldous-huxley-gives-a-speech/ Tue, 20 Mar 1962 00:00:32 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=17121 There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because…

Read more →

]]>

There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution.

— Aldous Huxley

Sources:

]]> Frank Snepp gives an interview https://pandemictimeline.com/1983/01/frank-snepp-gives-an-interview/ Sat, 01 Jan 1983 00:01:32 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=16238 1983 Remember that “crazy conspiracy” about “Operation Mockingbird”? The ‘insane’ notion that the CIA has been manipulating the mainstream media for decades? Well, add it to the exploding list of conspiracies that have become truth in recent years. You’ll find this recently unearthed viral video is more relevant today than it was when it was…

Read more →

]]>

1983

Remember that “crazy conspiracy” about “Operation Mockingbird”? The ‘insane’ notion that the CIA has been manipulating the mainstream media for decades?

Well, add it to the exploding list of conspiracies that have become truth in recent years.

You’ll find this recently unearthed viral video is more relevant today than it was when it was originally recorded back in 1983.

Former CIA agent Frank Schnepp perfectly describes Operation Mockingbird – the process of laundering disinformation to the press in order to manipulate public opinion to believe government narratives:

— truth81

Former CIA agent Frank Schnepp carefully breaks down the process of laundering disinformation to the press in order to brainwash the masses into believing CIA and government narratives. Based on this testimony, the CIA would lie to journalists, float the same lie within their own agency and agencies in other countries so that journalists would corroborate it, and peddle false information through trusted media figures.

And if you think he’s lying, consider that the U.S. government sued Schnepp all the way to the Supreme Court, which ultimately ruled intelligence workers had to submit any statement for censorship by the agency, even those unrelated to secrets.

There is a movement on social media that attempts to whitewash any negative publicity about the CIA by claiming the agency doesn’t engage in that sort of behavior anymore. Whether it’s lying to Congress, drug trafficking, illegally spying on American citizens, or covertly operating programs without Congressional knowledge, the CIA is a law unto itself.

In 2017, WikiLeaks published more than 8,000 documents on the CIA. The confidential documents, codenamed Vault 7, dated from 2013–2016, included details on the CIA’s software capabilities, such as the ability to compromise cars, smart TVs, and web browsers, including Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, Firefox, and Opera, as well as the operating systems of most smartphones including Apple’s iOS and Android. If you think that the CIA and your government suddenly stopped lying to you sometime in the last 40 years, you are hopelessly naive.

The disturbing footage of mainstream media talking heads repeating the exact same scripted lines demonstrates the way the public are force-fed government propaganda. Which raises the question, what do they have to hide and why are they so determined to make everybody see these events in the same way? This is mind-control in action. There is a reason they are called programs and programming. And it’s far from the first time the media has been caught parroting from the same propaganda script.

— Video description

The name has also been reported as Frank Schnepp.

Sources:

Related:

See also, on this site:

]]> Henry Kissinger addresses the Bilderberg Group https://pandemictimeline.com/1992/05/henry-kissinger-addresses-the-bilderberg-group/ Thu, 21 May 1992 00:00:38 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=15674 Henry Kissinger in an address to the super secret Bilderberg Organization meeting at Evian, France, May 21, 1992 said the following as transcribed from a tape recording made by one of the Swiss delegates: “Today American’s would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful. This is…

Read more →

]]>

Henry Kissinger in an address to the super secret Bilderberg Organization meeting at Evian, France, May 21, 1992 said the following as transcribed from a tape recording made by one of the Swiss delegates:

“Today American’s would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government.”

— Rense.com

The origin of the above quote is not well documented, but it is likely true, given other agendas that Henry Kissinger subscribed to.

Sources:

]]> Kary Mullis is awarded the The Nobel Prize in Chemistry https://pandemictimeline.com/1993/12/kary-mullis-is-awarded-the-the-nobel-prize-in-chemistry/ Fri, 10 Dec 1993 00:00:39 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=4244 The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1993 was awarded “for contributions to the developments of methods within DNA-based chemistry” jointly with one half to Kary B. Mullis “for his invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method” and with one half to Michael Smith “for his fundamental contributions to the establishment of oligonucleotide-based, site-directed mutagenesis and…

Read more →

]]>

The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1993 was awarded “for contributions to the developments of methods within DNA-based chemistry” jointly with one half to Kary B. Mullis “for his invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method” and with one half to Michael Smith “for his fundamental contributions to the establishment of oligonucleotide-based, site-directed mutagenesis and its development for protein studies.”

Sources:

]]> Dr. D.A. Henderson founds the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security https://pandemictimeline.com/1998/01/dr-d-a-henderson-founds-the-johns-hopkins-center-for-health-security/ Thu, 01 Jan 1998 00:01:24 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=9465 1998 [The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security] was founded in 1998 by [Donald] A. Henderson as the first nongovernment organization to study the vulnerability of the US civilian population to biological weapons and how to prevent, prepare, and respond to their consequences. Dr. Henderson served as Editor Emeritus of the peer-reviewed journal Health Security (formerly Biosecurity and…

Read more →

]]> 1998

[The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security] was founded in 1998 by [Donald] A. Henderson as the first nongovernment organization to study the vulnerability of the US civilian population to biological weapons and how to prevent, prepare, and respond to their consequences.

Dr. Henderson served as Editor Emeritus of the peer-reviewed journal Health Security (formerly Biosecurity and Bioterrorism).

Apparently, the Center for Health Security was more associated with Dr. Henderson than with Johns Hopkins University.  The Center for Health Security became affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center in 2003.  Dr. Henderson passed away on August 20, 2016.  The Center for Health Security rejoined Johns Hopkins University in the following January.

Dr. Henderson was among those who were involved in the eradication of small pox.  He had ties with NIH and WHO.

When asked what should be eradicated next, D.A. would often respond, “bad management!”.

Did Dr. Henderson maybe have anyone specific in mind when he suggested eradicating bad management?

Sources:

Related:

]]> Time Magazine announces the future of medicine https://pandemictimeline.com/1999/01/time-magazine-announces-the-future-of-medicine/ Mon, 11 Jan 1999 00:00:29 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=11513 Source: See also, on this site: “Dr. Ardis Was WRONG”

Read more →

]]>

Source:

See also, on this site:

]]> Microsoft Corp files patent US6754472B1: Method and apparatus for transmitting power and data using the human body https://pandemictimeline.com/2000/04/microsoft-corp-files-patent-us6754472b1-method-and-apparatus-for-transmitting-power-and-data-using-the-human-body/ Thu, 27 Apr 2000 00:00:22 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=15613 Methods and apparatus for distributing power and data to devices coupled to the human body are described. The human body is used as a conductive medium, e.g., a bus, over which power and/or data is distributed. Power is distributed by coupling a power source to the human body via a first set of electrodes. One…

Read more →

]]>

Methods and apparatus for distributing power and data to devices coupled to the human body are described. The human body is used as a conductive medium, e.g., a bus, over which power and/or data is distributed. Power is distributed by coupling a power source to the human body via a first set of electrodes. One or more devise to be powered, e.g., peripheral devices, are also coupled to the human body via additional sets of electrodes. The devices may be, e.g., a speaker, display, watch, keyboard, etc. A pulsed DC signal or AC signal may be used as the power source. By using multiple power supply signals of differing frequencies, different devices can be selectively powered. Digital data and/or other information signals, e.g., audio signals, can be modulated on the power signal using frequency and/or amplitude modulation techniques.

— Patent US6754472B1

Source:

  • Patent
    April 27, 2000. Lyndsay Williams, William Vablais, and Steven N. Bathiche. Method and apparatus for transmitting power and data using the human body. United States US6754472B1, filed April 27, 2000, and issued June 22, 2004.
    https://patents.google.com/patent/US6754472B1/.
    Patent.
]]>