Pandemic Timeline

No liability shield, no jabs

💉 World Bank President David Malpass said in a Zoom presentation this week that “Pfizer has been hesitant to go into some of these countries because of the liability problems, they don’t have a liability shield.”

Um, I have a question. If the injections are completely safe and effective, why does Pfizer NEED a liability shield? Liability for WHAT?

It almost seems like Pfizer knows something that we don’t know. Weird.

Jeff Childers

This would appear to confirm what Dr. David Martin has said about filing a criminal case against those who have perpetrated the COVID crisis.  He believes that as soon as a criminal case is filed, Pfizer and the other jab producers will halt distribution of the jabs because their participation in it depends on liability shields.  Those shields were provided in the EUA agreements.  The perpetrators of the COVID crisis know that fraud vitiates everything.  If the vaccine manufacturers or any of the other perpetrators of the COVID crisis lose a criminal case, their liability shield goes away.  Several federal courts have shown a willingness to rule against the mandates.  It is beginning to appear more possible to succeed in a criminal case.  Perhaps the time has come.  If we want the COVID crisis to end, criminal cases must be filed.  Otherwise, the perpetrators will come up with reason after reason to perpetuate the crisis.  It is their plan to create such a major scare event that they will have permanent funding for vaccine research.

There has been a request for investigation filed at the ICC, but I am not aware of that case moving to trial yet.  Perhaps they are still in discovery.  With all of the depositions taken by Stiftung Corona Ausschuss, the ICC should have plenty to go on already.

So.  Who will be filing those criminal cases?  Who has the standing to move forward on a case?

Sources:

See also, on this site:

Comments are closed.