Pandemic Timeline

Uncategorized

Project Veritas series focuses on COVID-19 jabs

Tags:

Sources:

Post date is date Part 1 was posted on YouTube.  Videos are listed in the order they appear on YouTube.  I prefer to post videos from sites other than YouTube because YouTube postings seem to be a bit “fragile” these days, but my chosen site does not have all of the videos yet.  I have the promos in the list of sources, too.  I indented the minor videos to help you find the featured ones more easily.  The easiest way to find the features is to look for the “Activist” logos.

The following is from a CDC video:

Tom: Hi, I’m Dr. Tom Shimabukuro from CDC, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Adamma: And I’m Dr. Adamma Mba-Jonas from FDA, the US Food and Drug Administration.

Tom: The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS, is the national vaccine safety monitoring system run by the CDC and the FDA. We depend on people like you to send us reports of adverse events, or health problems, occurring after vaccination.

Adamma: Anyone can submit a report including healthcare professionals, patients, parents, and caregivers. We encourage you to report anything you think is a medically important health event. There is additional reporting guidance for healthcare professionals on the VAERS website.

Tom: It’s important to understand that VAERS is not designed to determine if a vaccine caused an adverse event. VAERS reports alone generally cannot tell us if there is a safety problem with a vaccine. Rather, VAERS is an early warning system to detect possible safety problems that require further evaluation.

Adamma: We welcome all reports regardless of seriousness and regardless of how likely the vaccine was to have caused the adverse event. We’ll analyze reports for any unusual or unexpected patterns. The information you provide helps us monitor the safety of vaccines. We appreciate your participation.

— CDC video

As mentioned in the CDC article about VAERS, healthcare providers are required to submit reports about adverse events following COVID-19 jabs.  It is not up to healthcare providers to determine whether the adverse event was related to the jab.  All adverse events are to be reported so that the FDA can make that determination.  It appears that this was part of the Phase 3 study design for these jabs.  When the jabs were first issued to the general public, they were still in study mode, but those providing the jabs and those treating jab recipients who had adverse events typically do not think of themselves as research scientists.

Following the airing of Part 1 of the series, Congressman Paul Gosar wrote a letter to HHS requesting investigation, based on the failure of healthcare providers to do required reporting.  According to Rep. Gosar, failure to report adverse events can deprive patients of their ability to seek compensation.

Did these healthcare providers know that the terms of the Emergency Use Authorizations essentially deputized them as research scientists with a requirement to report?  If the required reporting had been done, how different might regulator decisions about the jabs have been?

But reporting appears to have continued as it always had. Studies of VAERS system usage done prior to the COVID-19 pandemic estimate that usage to be less than 1%.

Did the FDA take reporting rate into account when they analyzed the adverse event data for the jab approvals? Did the FDA assume that healthcare providers were all following orders? Or worse, was there an intention for adverse event data to be analyzed in its underreported state, thus virtually assuring approval of drugs that might otherwise have been deemed too dangerous?

Medical workers complain that the VAERS reports take too much time. Each report takes about 30 minutes to prepare.

Medical records are now all digitized.

Could the medical recording systems have been set up to automatically prepare the VAERS reports? Or was this too much to ask?

Because healthcare providers willfully refused to submit reports to VAERS, we now have a situation where the FDA did not have all of the data they needed to evaluate these jabs properly in the approval process. If the doctors mentioned in Part 1 of the Project Veritas series had made sure the VAERS reports were done, maybe the FDA employees in Part 2 might have known that the jabs actually are not safe.  Adamma in the CDC video did say that anyone could submit reports.  Perhaps some of that COVID-19 money going to healthcare providers should have been earmarked for the extra medical records personnel that the healthcare providers would need.  It now appears that it was too much to expect that the healthcare providers could fill the role of research scientist and provide the needed data.

By the time the restaurant meeting in Part 2 took place, the data from England and Israel had already been published.  Had the FDA employees considered them, those reports also could have clued them in that there was a problem.  England produces reports every week.

Sources:

See also, on this site:

Comments are closed.