hydrogel – Pandemic Timeline https://pandemictimeline.com Chronological Sequence of Events Mon, 20 Mar 2023 00:15:13 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 https://pandemictimeline.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Covid-150x150.ico hydrogel – Pandemic Timeline https://pandemictimeline.com 32 32 Dr. Carrie Madej: “What does it mean to be ‘human’?” https://pandemictimeline.com/2020/08/dr-carrie-madej-what-does-it-mean-to-be-human/ Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:00:26 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=5319 Note that Dr. Carrie Madej made this video well before the jab rollouts.  Dr. Madej claims to have first-hand knowledge of the intentions behind technology included in the inoculations, and she has had this knowledge for a long time.  If her statements about her history are true, then the comments she makes about the technology…

Read more →

]]>

Note that Dr. Carrie Madej made this video well before the jab rollouts.  Dr. Madej claims to have first-hand knowledge of the intentions behind technology included in the inoculations, and she has had this knowledge for a long time.  If her statements about her history are true, then the comments she makes about the technology are not mere speculation or theory, but rather important information that needs to be heeded in order to get a clear picture of what is really going on.

It is already obvious that this entire pandemic situation is not about health, but rather has some other purpose.  Had this been about health, the death count on Day 1 of the jab rollouts would have ended it immediately.  But instead, the propaganda around the jab rollouts has intensified.  It’s clearly about something else.

The proper term for the technology in the jabs is “gene therapy.”  This is the term used in the Emergency Use Authorization paperwork.  When DNA is modified, the potential exists for the organism to become owned.  I have personally seen paperwork showing that a pharmaceutical company claimed to own someone’s DNA, so I can vouch for this as a real risk.  Pharmaceutical companies are including humans in their claims.

Dr. Madej claims that the creation of antibodies does not guarantee immunity from the target disease.  This proved to be true when a vaccinated person succumbed to COVID-19.

I recommend searching out other information provided by Dr. Carrie Madej as well.

Sources:

Related:

These are links from the descriptions on Dr. Madej’s videos.  A few of these links are elsewhere on this site.

See also, on this site:

]]> A former Pfizer employee shows documentation of graphene oxide in COVID-19 vaccines https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/07/a-former-pfizer-employee-shows-documentation-of-graphene-oxide-in-covid-19-vaccines/ Wed, 28 Jul 2021 00:00:09 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=1997 A Pfizer document mentioning graphene oxide was included in the February 2023 document dump. Whether the jabs contain graphene oxide is no longer speculation. We are no longer depending on laboratory science to show us that the jabs contain graphene oxide. This is now documented by Pfizer. Graphene oxide in the jabs is now an…

Read more →

]]>

A Pfizer document mentioning graphene oxide was included in the February 2023 document dump. Whether the jabs contain graphene oxide is no longer speculation. We are no longer depending on laboratory science to show us that the jabs contain graphene oxide. This is now documented by Pfizer. Graphene oxide in the jabs is now an indisputable fact.

When I read this information, I didn’t know a woman could cry as hard as I cried. … These are bioweapons.

— Karen Kingston

According to Karen Kingston, a former Pfizer employee, graphene oxide is in the vaccines but not listed directly on the patents because its use is a trade secret. It is the main ingredient in hydrogel. Karen Kingston claims that the “Pegylated lipid” in the above illustration contains graphene oxide. It is made by SINOPEG in China. Lipids in the patent are listed on SINOPEG’s site.

The graphene oxide molecules can hold a charge. The ones used in the vaccines are supposed to be neutral. The potential exists that these graphene oxide molecules could become charged later. Graphene oxide is also capable of hosting a magnetic field. So even if the graphene oxide is not magnetic when injected, the possibility exists that it could become magnetically charged later.  Graphene oxide in the charged state is toxic and can destroy whatever it comes in contact with.  Graphene oxide has the potential to connect to the internet.

Main talking points:

  • all of the COVID-19 “vaccines” are bioweapons
  • there are 4 PEGylated lipid nano particles in the COVID-19 vaccines (PEG = polyethylene glycol):
    1. a cholesterol lipid enables the vaccine ingredients to be transported by the blood
    2. the phospholipid adheres to the cell membrane to make it permeable
    3. an ionizable lipid provides a positive ionic charge so the mRNA can enter the cell
    4. a PEGylated lipid made by SINOPEG, a Chinese company
  • mRNA is very unstable, thus it needs a “biosphere” to protect it until it can enter the cell – this is provided by the lipid nano particles and graphene oxide which is 4,000 time stronger than titanium, can withstand 1,700 F temperatures, is an excellent conductor of electricity, and can host a magnetic field
  • graphene oxide is not listed in the patent applications because a), it is poisonous to humans and b), because it is the main ingredient in hydrogel which can be used to create a brain-computer interface and a drug delivery system, though Kingston notes that this is not possible “with this round [of vaccines]” because “they rushed this thing out” and “they’re just seeing how much they can put into people before they… die”
  • the graphene oxide in the vaccines is neutrally charged (inactive), however if/when it becomes positively charged, such as by electromagnetic radiation (radio frequency, such as wireless devices, wireless networks such as 5G, etc.), it will annihilate anything it comes into contact with and therefore can cause great damage and death depending on how much of it exists in the body and where it is located
  • multiple COVID-19 “vaccines” and booster shots may increase the amount of graphene oxide in the body
  • the COVID-19 vaccine study should have been stopped when, during a study with mice, 80% died within 24 hours and the remainder died within the next few days

This may not be the whole story.  Go see the post where it was reported that graphene was found in the vaccines.  Some of the links on that post include photos.

Dr. Ariyana Love has found further proof of graphene in the jabs and what it is doing there.  Her information confirms that Karen Kingston may have been correct in thinking that the earliest jabs did not have everything intended in them because they had been rolled out too fast.

Do the photos of graphene found in the vaccines look like the graphene was used as Karen Kingston reported? Or is it something else?

Sources:

See also, on this site:

]]> Ricardo Delgado finds what he believes is a micro-router in a Pfizer vial https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/12/ricardo-delgado-finds-what-he-believes-is-a-micro-router-in-a-pfizer-vial/ Fri, 31 Dec 2021 00:00:21 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=8475 A Pfizer document mentioning graphene oxide was included in the February 2023 document dump. Whether the jabs contain graphene oxide is no longer speculation. We are no longer depending on laboratory science to show us that the jabs contain graphene oxide. This is now documented by Pfizer. Graphene oxide in the jabs is now an…

Read more →

]]>

A Pfizer document mentioning graphene oxide was included in the February 2023 document dump. Whether the jabs contain graphene oxide is no longer speculation. We are no longer depending on laboratory science to show us that the jabs contain graphene oxide. This is now documented by Pfizer. Graphene oxide in the jabs is now an indisputable fact.

Dear friends and subscribers. After the shocking program of la Quinta Columna on December 31, in which Ricardo Delgado presented an unknown object, self-assembled after a few days, work has begun to try to identify the observed patterns and help clarify the truth.

The first step taken is the elaboration of the scheme/draft of the pattern found in the aforementioned object, where shapes very similar to those that could be obtained in integrated circuits are perceived. The work of searching and comparing the scientific literature has just begun.

We will find the scheme of this circuit. Much encouragement to la Quinta Columna and to all those who seek to discover the truth.

— La Quinta Columna

A practical, enlightening overview and explanation of self-assembly and nanotechnology

Self-assembly is an important method used in nanotechnology to construct objects from the nanoscale to microscale. A fabrication process in which nanostructures form naturally has the potential to be much cheaper than building the nanostructures manually. To encourage and facilitate exploration of these processes, Self-Assembly and Nanotechnology: A Force Balance Approach:

  • Explores a variety of materials and situations in which self-assembly nanotechnology is becoming increasingly important
  • Addresses the critical junction of two important fields: self-assembly and nanotechnology, with seven chapters on each field
  • Bridges the topics of self-assembly, colloids, and surfaces with nanotechnology
  • Approaches self-assembly, nanotechnology, and related topics with one unified concept—force balance
  • Provides a concise and conceptual description of the fundamental forces involved in both self-assembly and nanotechnology
  • Includes clear schematic illustrations to represent the principles
  • Integrates recent discoveries and findings

This is an ideal text for courses that span different disciplines or different departments—a very effective approach for teaching nanotechnology. Complete with references for further, more in-depth information at the end of each chapter, it is also a valuable resource for researchers and scientists, including chemical engineers, physical and materials scientists, and others.

— Back cover of Self-Assembly and Nanotechnology: A Force Balance Approach

So self-assembly of nanotechnology structures really is a “thing.”  There’s an entire book on the topic.  The technology described by La Quinta Columna does exist, and it’s magnetic.  Moderna calls its technology an operating system.  If so, then it is preparation for something yet to come.

As it turns out, Anthony Fauci has actually mentioned self-assembling nanotechnology in connection with Operation Warp Speed and the vaccines in a report submitted to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.

Were patients properly informed that the jabs contained this type of technology?  How many people would have accepted the jabs, had they known they contained this technology?  Did the CDC and FDA know that this technology was in the vials? Is the self-assembling nanotechnology taking the form intended?  What laws may have been broken by the inclusion of this technology?

Sources:

Related:

The following source gets the “Speculation” label because it comes from an alleged extraterrestrial source.  The information might possibly be verifiable; but to my knowledge, a study of this topic has not taken place yet.  This link is included as a suggestion that perhaps such a study should be done.

See also, on this site:

]]>