The Nuremberg Code (German: Nürnberger Kodex) is part of a judicial ruling.  The Kodex has not been officially accepted as law by any nation or as official ethics guidelines by any association.  In the US, when preparing a legal case, refer to the National Research Act, which is legislation from the US Congress.  The National Research Act implements key provisions from the Nuremberg Code.

Following World War II, tribunals were held in Nuremberg, Germany.  Among those tried were the doctors in the Nazi concentration camps where prisoners were forced to participate in medical experiments.  The ten points of the Nuremberg Code were given in the section of the judges’ verdict against Nazi doctors entitled “Permissible Medical Experiments.”  The following is a summary.

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probably cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

For the detailed list, please see this article: Nuremberg Code

Sources:

• 
  United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. “Nuremberg Code.”
  https://www.ushmm.org/information/exhibitions/online-exhibitions/special-focus/doctors-trial/nuremberg-code.
  General Website Link.
• 
  “Nuremberg Code.” In Wikipedia.
  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nuremberg_Code.
  Reference.
• 
  November 13, 1997. Evelyne Shuster. “Fifty Years Later: The Significance of the Nuremberg Code.” New England Journal of Medicine 337 (20): 1436–40.
  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199711133372006.
  Research Journal.

Related:

• 
  October 20, 2021. “Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine [Pfizer-BioNTech].” US Food & Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download.
  Food & Drug Administration.
  This document has instructions for healthcare providers who are administering the vaccines.
• 
  October 19, 2005. “Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: UNESCO.” United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
  http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html.
  General Website Link.
  Article 3.2: “The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society.”
  And there is more in this document related to the issue at hand, all of which is also being violated in the current crisis.

See also, on this site:

• The National Research Act is signed into law.
• FDA approves Comirnaty COVID-19 Vaccine
• Federal judge rejects DOD claim that Pfizer EUA and Comirnaty vaccines are ‘interchangeable’

• 
  March 27, 2020. Pepe Escobar. “Why France Is Hiding a Cheap, Tested Virus Cure.” Asia Times.
  https://asiatimes.com/2020/03/why-france-is-hiding-a-cheap-and-tested-virus-cure/.
  News.

• 
  April 6, 2020. Solange Reyner. “AMA President on Trump’s HCQ Pitch: ‘You Could Lose Your Life.’” Newsmax. Runtime of embedded video: 1:52.
  https://www.newsmax.com/politics/hydroxychloroquine-hcq-american-medical/2020/04/06/id/961629/.
  News, Video.
• 
  April 9, 2020. “AMA Prefers Death to Treating without Data, States the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).” Yahoo! News.
  https://web.archive.org/web/20200412113905/https://news.yahoo.com/ama-prefers-death-treating-without-154500445.html.
  News.

See also, on this site:

• Study evaluation finds that WHO HCQ study participants were overdosed.

According to Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, the New York doctor who pioneered the use of Hydroxychloroquine and zinc to treat the coronavirus shares shocking statements of how Big Pharma is suppressing life-saving treatment, this journal article was created expressly for the purpose of defying and subverting Pres. Trump’s order to make HCQ available to all American citizens.

Sources:

• 
  May 1, 2020. Mandeep R. Mehra, Sapan S. Desai, SreyRam Kuy, Timothy D. Henry, and Amit N. Patel. “Cardiovascular Disease, Drug Therapy, and Mortality in Covid-19.” The New England Journal of Medicine.
  https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2007621.
  Research Journal, Hoax.
• 
  July 9, 2021. Claire Chretien [LifeSiteNews]. Dr. Zelenko: “Life Saving Information…Is Being Criminally Suppressed” by Big Pharma. Runtime: 17:00.
  https://rumble.com/vjnael-dr.-zelenko-life-saving-information…is-being-criminally-suppressed-by-big.html.
  Video, Expert.

See also, on this site:

• Two medical journals retract study submitted by Surgisphere after company called into question.
• All posts citing the 7 July 2021 interview between LifeSiteNews and Dr. Zelenko, clip on Big Pharma criminal suppression

An exception is made for treating hospital patients.

The rationale for this action is based on the Surgisphere studies that were retracted on June 2, 2020.  The retraction took place prior to the date of the revocation of EUA for HCQ.  This appears to be an instance of “Wrap Up” Smear.

Sources:

• 
  June 16, 2020. US Food & Drug Administration. “Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Revokes Emergency Use Authorization for Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine.”
  https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-revokes-emergency-use-authorization-chloroquine-and.
  Food & Drug Administration.
• 
  April 18, 2019. US Food & Drug Administration. “Understanding Unapproved Use of Approved Drugs ‘Off Label.’”
  https://www.fda.gov/patients/learn-about-expanded-access-and-other-treatment-options/understanding-unapproved-use-approved-drugs-label.
  Food & Drug Administration.
• 
  July 9, 2021. Claire Chretien [LifeSiteNews]. Dr. Zelenko: “Life Saving Information…Is Being Criminally Suppressed” by Big Pharma. Runtime: 17:00.
  https://rumble.com/vjnael-dr.-zelenko-life-saving-information…is-being-criminally-suppressed-by-big.html.
  Video, Expert.

See also, on this site:

• FDA grants approval for Plaquenil (hydroxychloro­quine sulfate, aka HCQ)
• Virology Journal: “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread”
• Rep. Nancy Pelosi explains the “Wrap Up” Smear.
• Two medical journals retract study submitted by Surgisphere after company called into question.
• All posts citing the 7 July 2021 interview between LifeSiteNews and Dr. Zelenko, clip on Big Pharma criminal suppression

Video of the press conference went viral before it was censored from social media. These are doctors who have actually treated COVID-19 patients, so they know what they’re talking about. The video can still be found here: DR. STELLA IMMANUEL | THERE IS A CURE FOR COVID… HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE

Source:

• 
  America’s Frontline Doctors.
  https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/.
  Doctor Organization, Activist.

See also, on this site:

• America’s Frontline Doctors hold one-year anniversary White Coat Summit

Reiner Fuellmich is the leader of Stiftung Corona Ausschuss (Corona Committee Foundation).

The German Corona Investigative Committee has taken testimony from a large number of international scientists and experts since July 10, 2020.

Their conclusions are the following: 

• The corona crisis must be renamed the “Corona Scandal”
• It is:
  • The biggest tort case ever
  • The greatest crime against humanity ever committed
• Those responsible must be:
  • Criminally prosecuted for crimes against humanity
  • Sued for civil damages
• Deaths
  • There is no excess mortality in any country
  • Corona virus mortality equals seasonal flu
  • 94% of deaths in Bergamo were caused by transferring sick patients to nursing homes where they infected old people with weak immune systems
  • Doctors and hospitals worldwide were paid to declare deceased victims of Covid-19
  • Autopsies showed:
    • Fatalities almost all caused by serious pre-existing conditions
    • Almost all deaths were very old people
    • Sweden (no lockdown) and Britain (strict lockdown) have comparable disease and mortality statistics
  • US states with and without lockdowns have comparable disease and mortality statistics
• Health
  • Hospitals remain empty and some face bankruptcy
  • Populations have T-cell immunity from previous influenza waves
  • Herd immunity needs only 15-25% population infection and is already achieved
  • Only when a person has symptoms can an infection be contagious
• Tests:
  • Many scientists call this a PCR-test pandemic, not a corona pandemic
  • Very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive
  • Likelihood of false-positives is 89-94% or near certainty
  • Prof. Drosten developed his PCR test from an old SARS virus without ever having seen the real Wuhan virus from China
  • The PCR test is not based on scientific facts with respect to infections
  • PCR tests are useless for the detection of infections
  • A positive PCR test does not mean an infection is present or that an intact virus has been found
  • Amplification of samples over 35 cycles is unreliable but WHO recommended 45 cycles
• Illegality:
  • The German government locked down, imposed social-distancing/ mask-wearing on the basis of a single opinion
  • The lockdown was imposed when the virus was already retreating
  • The lockdowns were based on non-existent infections
  • Former president of the German federal constitutional court doubted the constitutionality of the corona measures
  • Former UK supreme court judge Lord Sumption concluded there was no factual basis for panic and no legal basis for corona measures
  • German RKI (CDC equivalent) recommended no autopsies be performed
  • Corona measures have no sufficient factual or legal basis, are unconstitutional and must be repealed immediately
  • No serious scientist gives any validity to the infamous Neil Ferguson’s false computer models warning of millions of deaths
  • Mainstream media completely failed to report the true facts of the so-called pandemic
  • Democracy is in danger of being replaced by fascist totalitarian models
  • Drosten (of PCR test), Tedros of WHO, and others have committed crimes against humanity as defined in the International Criminal Code
  • Politicians can avoid going down with the charlatans and criminals by starting the long overdue public scientific discussion
• Conspiracy:
  • Politicians and mainstream media deliberately drove populations to panic
  • Children were calculatedly made to feel responsible “for the painful tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they do not follow Corona rules”
  • The hopeless PCR test is used to create fear and not to diagnose
  • There can be no talk of a second wave
• Injury and damage:
  • Evidence of gigantic health and economic damage to populations
  • Anti-corona measures have:
    • Killed innumerable people
    • Destroyed countless companies and individuals worldwide
  • Children are being taken away from their parents
  • Children are traumatized en masse
  • Bankruptcies are expected in small- and medium-sized businesses
• Redress:
  • A class action lawsuit must be filed in the USA or Canada, with all affected parties worldwide having the opportunity to join
  • Companies and self-employed people must be compensated for damages

Sources:

• 
  May 11, 2021. Reiner Fuellmich. “Video: ‘Crimes Against Humanity’: The German Corona Investigation. ‘The PCR Pandemic.’” Global Research. Runtime of embedded video: 49:00.
  https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-crimes-against-humanity-the-german-corona-investigation/5725795.
  News, Video.
  This article includes the “Conclusions” list above.
• 
  Stiftung Corona Ausschuss.
  https://corona-ausschuss.de/.
  Activist, Video.
  This is the page where you can find the deposition videos in preparation for the cases of crimes against humanity. The committee speaks German most of the time, but some interviews are in other languages including English.
• 
  Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Dr. Fuellmich (Law Firm Dr. Fill Me).
  https://www.fuellmich.com/.
  Law, Activist.
  Reiner Fuellmich is the chief lawyer in the Stiftung Corona Ausschuss effort.
• 
  March 28, 2021. “How To Become Part of Dr. Reiner Fuellmich’s Class Action Law Suit.” Rights and Freedoms.
  https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/03/28/how-to-become-part-of-dr-reiner-fuellmichs-class-action-law-suit/.
  Blog.

See also, on this site:

• Reiner Fuellmich summarizes findings to date

Dr Tess Lawrie has proven herself to be rock solid in both scientific knowledge, ethics, and activism. She is the director of Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy, founder of the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development Initiative, and one of the founders of the World Council for Health.

— Dr. Mark Trozzi

At the time Dr. Tess Lawrie called Dr. Andrew Hill on January 13, she was conducting a conference to review ivermectin studies for the purpose of producing a meta-analysis study.

Enter Dr. Andrew Hill, considered a hero to the ivermectin movement. The mainstream academic researcher was big on ivermectin, even joining founders of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), including Drs. Pierre Kory and Paul Marik, in a meeting with the NIH. TrialSite reported on the event when the NIH’s COVID-19 treatment guidelines panel invited the ivermectin researchers to discuss their observations and findings.Subscribe to the Trialsitenews “SARS-CoV-2” ChannelNo spam – we promise

Hill, affiliated with Liverpool University, also advised several groups, including Unitaid, affiliated with the World Health Organization (WHO). His research was to have a profound influence on whether WHO would accept ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19.

While Hill’s original meta-analysis raised significant positive findings—again, the researcher went out of his way to support the FLCCC when they visited the NIH and then the Senate; however, once his manuscript was completed in draft form and ready for review, modifications diminishing the impact of ivermectin ensued.

— Covid Strategies

[Robert F. Kennedy Jr.] describes multiple studies of the protective power of the cheap, long-established drug ivermectin in countering Covid, and estimates of hundreds of thousands of lives lost as a result of suppression of its use. Under US law, the Covid vaccines could not have received emergency approval if effective treatments for the disease had been acknowledged as available.

The book includes a riveting account of an exchange last January between Dr Tess Lawrie, director of the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy in Bath, England, and Dr Andrew Hill, author of a favourable analysis of ivermectin studies. He had subsequently performed a ‘neck-wrenching’ U-turn on the issue, claiming the studies comprised ‘low certainty’ of value and that more trials were needed.

Lawrie was trying to persuade Hill to participate in and co-author an immediate review of all published ivermectin studies in the medical literature, to be conducted by the eminent Cochrane Network, which uses thousands of volunteers to make high-quality, independent treatment recommendations.

‘It was an exciting opportunity,’ Kennedy writes. ‘Under normal circumstances, Hill should have pounced on this chance to serve as lead author with some of the world’s most prestigious researchers. He was nevertheless noncommittal.

‘The following week, she spoke to Hill again, this time by Zoom. The Zoom call was recorded.

‘Dr Lawrie asked Hill to explain his U-turn on ivermectin, which his own analysis found overwhelmingly effective. “How can you do this?” she inquired politely. “You are causing irreparable harm.” Hill explained that he was in a “tricky situation” because his sponsors had put pressure on him. Hill is a University of Liverpool virologist who serves as an adviser to Bill Gates and the Clinton Foundation. He told me his sponsor was Unitaid.

‘Unitaid is a quasi-governmental advocacy organisation funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and several countries – France, the United Kingdom, Norway, Brazil, Spain, the Republic of Korea and Chile – to lobby governments to finance the purchase of

medicines from pharmaceutical multinationals for distribution to the African poor. Its primary purpose seems to be protecting the patent and intellectual property rights of pharmaceutical companies – which, as we shall see, is the priority passion for Bill Gates – and to insure their prompt and full payment. About 63 per cent of its funding comes from a surtax on airline tickets. The BMGF holds a board seat and chairs Unitaid’s Executive Committee, and the BMGF has given Unitaid $150million since 2005. Various Gates-funded surrogate and front organisations also contribute, as does the pharmaceutical industry.

‘The BMGF and Gates personally own large stakes in many of the pharmaceutical companies that profit from this boondoggle. Gates also uses Unitaid to fund corrupt science by tame and compromised researchers like Hill that legitimises his policy directives to the WHO.

‘Unitaid gave $40million to Andrew Hill’s employer, the University of Liverpool, four days before the publication of Hill’s study. Hill, a PhD, confessed that the sponsors were pressuring him to influence his conclusion. When Dr Lawrie asked who was trying to influence him, Hill said, “I mean, I, I think I’m in a very sensitive position here . . .”.’

Lawrie: ‘Lots of people are in sensitive positions; they’re in hospital, in ICUs dying, and they need this medicine.’

Hill: ‘Well . . .’

Lawrie: ‘This is what I don’t get, you know, because you’re not a clinician. You’re not seeing people dying every day. And this medicine prevents deaths by 80 per cent. So 80 per cent of those people who are dying today don’t need to die because there’s ivermectin.’

Hill: ‘There are a lot, as I said, there are a lot of different opinions about this. As I say, some people simply . . .’

Lawrie: ‘We are looking at the data; it doesn’t matter what other people say. We are the ones who are tasked with looking at the data and reassuring everybody that this cheap and effective treatment will save lives. It’s clear. You don’t have to say, well, so-and-so says this, and so-and-so says that. It’s absolutely crystal clear. We can save lives today. If we can get the government to buy ivermectin.’

Hill: ‘Well, I don’t think it’s as simple as that, because you’ve got trials . . .’

Lawrie: ‘It is as simple as that. We don’t have to wait for studies . . . we have enough evidence now that shows that ivermectin saves lives, it prevents hospitalisation. It saves the clinical staff going to work every day and being exposed. And frankly, I’m shocked at how you are not taking responsibility for that decision. And you still haven’t told me who is [influencing you]? Who is giving you that opinion? Because you keep saying you’re in a sensitive position. I appreciate you are in a sensitive position, if you’re being paid for something and you’re being told [to support] a

certain narrative . . . that is a sensitive position. So, then you kind of have to decide, well, do I take this payment? Because in actual fact, [you] can see [your false] conclusions are going to harm people. So maybe you need to say, I’m not going to be paid for this. I can see the evidence, and I will join the Cochrane team as a volunteer, like everybody on the Cochrane team is a volunteer. Nobody’s being paid for this work.’

Hill: ‘I think fundamentally, we’re reaching the [same] conclusion about the survival benefit. We’re both finding a significant effect on survival.’

Lawrie: ‘No, I’m grading my evidence. I’m saying I’m sure of this evidence. I’m saying I’m absolutely sure it prevents deaths. There is nothing as effective as this treatment. What is your reluctance? Whose conclusion is that?’

Hill complains again that outsiders are influencing him.

Lawrie: ‘You keep referring to other people. It’s like you don’t trust yourself. If you were to trust yourself, you would know that you have made an error and you need to correct it because you know, in your heart, that this treatment prevents death.’

Hill: ‘Well, I know, I know for a fact that the data right now is not going to get the drug approved.’

Lawrie: ‘But, Andy – know this will come out. It will come out that there were all these barriers to the truth being told to the public and to the evidence being presented. So please, this is your opportunity just to acknowledge [the truth] in your review, change your conclusions, and come on board with this Cochrane Review, which will be definitive. It will be the review that shows the evidence and gives the proof. This was the consensus on Wednesday night’s meeting with 20 experts.’

Hill protests that the US National Institutes of Health will not agree to recommend ivermectin.

Lawrie: ‘Yeah, because the NIH is owned by the vaccine lobby.’

Hill: ‘That’s not something I know about.’

Lawrie: ‘Well, all I’m saying is this smacks of corruption and you are being played.’

Hill: ‘I don’t think so.’

Lawrie: ‘Well then, you have no excuse because your work in that review is flawed. It’s rushed. It is not properly put together.’

Lawrie points out that Hill’s study ignores a host of clinical outcomes that affect patients. She scolds Hill for ignoring the beneficial effects of ivermectin as prophylaxis, its effect on speed to testing negative for the virus, on the need for mechanical ventilation, on reduced admissions to intensive care, and other outcomes that are clinically meaningful. ‘This is bad research . . . bad research. So, at this point, I don’t know . . . you seem like a nice guy, but I am really, really worried about you.’

Hill: ‘Okay. Yeah. I mean, it’s, it’s a difficult situation.’

Lawrie: ‘No, you might be in a difficult situation. I’m not, because I have no paymaster. I can tell the truth. How can you deliberately try and mess it up . . . you know?’

Hill: ‘It’s not messing it up. It’s saying that we need, we need a short time to look at some more studies.’

Lawrie: ‘So, how long are you going to let people carry on dying unnecessarily – up to you? What is, what is the timeline that you’ve allowed for this, then?’

Hill: ‘Well, I think . . . I think that it goes to WHO and the NIH and the FDA [US Food and Drug Administration] and the EMA [European Medicines Agency]. And they’ve got to decide when they think enough’s enough.’

Lawrie: ‘How do they decide? Because there’s nobody giving them good evidence synthesis, because yours is certainly not good.’

Hill: ‘Well, when yours comes out, which will be in the very near future . . . at the same time, there’ll be other trials producing results, which will nail it with a bit of luck. And we’ll be there.’

Lawrie: ‘It’s already nailed.’

Hill: ‘No, that’s, that’s not the view of the WHO and the FDA.’

Lawrie: ‘You’d rather risk loads of people’s lives. Do you know if you and I stood together on this, we could present a united front and we could get this thing. We could make it happen. We could save lives; we could prevent [British National Health Service doctors and nurses] people from getting infected. We could prevent the elderly from dying.

‘These are studies conducted around the world in several different countries. And they’re all saying the same thing. Plus there’s all sorts of other evidence to show that it works. Randomised controlled trials do not need to be the be-all and end-all. But [even] based on the randomised controlled trials, it is clear that ivermectin works. It prevents deaths and it prevents harms and it improves outcomes for people . . .

‘I can see we’re getting nowhere because you have an agenda, whether you like it or not, whether you admit to it or not, you have an agenda. And the agenda is to kick this down the road as far as you can. So . . . we are trying to save lives. That’s what we do. I’m a doctor and I’m going to save as many lives as I can. And I’m going to do that through getting the message [out] on ivermectin. Okay. Unfortunately, your work is going to impair that, and you seem to be able to bear the burden of many, many deaths, which I cannot do.’

Lawrie then asks again: ‘Would you tell me? I would like to know who pays you as a consultant through WHO?’

Hill: ‘It’s Unitaid.’

Lawrie: ‘All right. So who helped to . . . Whose conclusions are those on the review that you’ve done? Who is not listed as an author? Who’s actually contributed?’

Hill: ‘Well, I mean, I don’t really want to get into, I mean, it . . . Unitaid . . .’

Lawrie: ‘I think that . . . it needs to be clear. I would like to know who, who are these other voices that are in your paper that are not acknowledged? Does Unitaid have a say? Do they influence what you write?’

Hill: ‘Unitaid has a say in the conclusions of the paper. Yeah.’

Lawrie: ‘Okay. So, who is it in Unitaid, then? Who is giving you opinions on your evidence?’

Hill: ‘Well, it’s just the people there. I don’t . . .’

Lawrie: ‘So they have a say in your conclusions.’

Hill: ‘Yeah.’

Lawrie: ‘Could you please give me a name of someone in Unitaid I could speak to, so that I can share my evidence and hope to try and persuade them to understand it?’

Hill: ‘Oh, I’ll have a think about who to, to offer you with a name . . . but I mean, this is very difficult because I’m, you know, I’ve, I’ve got this role where I’m supposed to produce this paper and we’re in a very difficult, delicate balance . . .’

Lawrie: ‘Who are these people? Who are these people saying this?’

Hill: ‘Yeah . . . it’s a very strong lobby . . .’

Lawrie: ‘Okay. Look, I think I can see kind of a dead end, because you seem to have a whole lot of excuses, but, um, you know, that to, to justify bad research practice. So I’m really, really sorry about this, Andy. I really, really wish, and you’ve explained quite clearly to me, in both what you’ve been saying and in your body language that you’re not entirely comfortable with your conclusions, and that you’re in a tricky position because of whatever influence people are having on you, and including the people who have paid you and who have basically written that conclusion for you.’

Hill: ‘You’ve just got to understand I’m in a difficult position. I’m trying to steer a middle ground and it’s extremely hard.’

Lawrie: ‘Yeah. Middle ground. The middle ground is not a middle ground . . . You’ve taken a position right to the other extreme calling for further trials that are going to kill people. So this will come out, and you will be culpable. And I can’t understand why you don’t see that, because the evidence is there and you are not just denying it, but your work’s actually actively obfuscating the truth. And this will come out. So I’m really sorry . . . As I say, you seem like a nice guy, but I think you’ve just kind of been misled somehow.’

Hill promises he will do everything in his power to get ivermectin approved if she will give him six weeks.

Hill: ‘Well, what I hope is that this, this stalemate that we’re in doesn’t last very long. It lasts a matter of weeks. And I guarantee I will push for this to last for as short amount of time as possible.’

Lawrie: ‘So, how long do you think the stalemate will go on for? How long do you think you will be paid to [make] the stalemate go on?’

Hill: ‘From my side. Okay . . . I think end of February, we will be there, six weeks.’

Lawrie: ‘How many people die every day?’

Hill: ‘Oh, sure. I mean, you know, 15,000 people a day.’

Lawrie: ‘Fifteen thousand people a day times six weeks . . . because at this rate, all other countries are getting ivermectin except the UK and the USA, because the UK and the USA and Europe are owned by the vaccine lobby.’

Hill: ‘My goal is to get the drug approved and to do everything I can to get it approved so that it reaches the maximum . . .’

Lawrie: ‘You’re not doing everything you can, because everything you can would involve saying to those people who are paying you, “I can see this prevents deaths. So I’m not going to support this conclusion any more, and I’m going to tell the truth”.’

Hill: ‘What, I’ve got to do my responsibilities to get as much support as I can to get this drug approved as quickly as possible.’

Lawrie: ‘Well, you’re not going to get it approved the way you’ve written that conclusion. You’ve actually shot yourself in the foot, and you’ve shot us all in the foot. All of . . . everybody trying to do something good. You have actually completely destroyed it.’

Hill: ‘Okay. Well, that’s where we’ll, I guess we’ll have to agree to differ.’

Lawrie: ‘Yeah. Well, I don’t know how you sleep at night, honestly.’

Kennedy adds that at the conclusion of a January 14, 2021 conference on ivermectin, Dr Lawrie declared that had the drug been employed in 2020, ‘when medical colleagues around the world first alerted the authorities to its efficacy, millions of lives could have been saved, and the pandemic with all its associated suffering and loss brought to a rapid and timely end’.

— Neville Hodgkinson with quoted material from Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s book.

These people literally put profits ahead of lives.  Andrew Hill knew that ivermectin was effective, and yet he succumbed to pressure from the university where he worked because they would lose a large grant if he published the truth.

Sources:

• 
  December 2, 2021. Neville Hodgkinson. “The Vaccine Gold Rush and the Damning Ivermectin Tape.” The Conservative Woman.
  https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-vaccine-gold-rush-and-the-damning-ivermectin-tape/.
  Blog.
  This article includes the transcript included above of the January 13 Zoom call between Dr. Tess Lawrie and Andrew Hill.
• 
  April 27, 2021. Tess Lawrie. ⁣Powerful Speech by Dr Tess Lawrie IICC International Ivermectin Conference Day 2. Info that matters. https://www.bitchute.com/video/F4DA6uljcJYD/.
  Video.
  This is a speech from an April conference.  This video comes from an excellent channel for further exploration.
• 
  May 16, 2021. Pierre Kory. How Public Health Agencies Are Manufacturing Uncertainty about Covid Treatments | Dr. Pierre Kory. Important Covid Videos. Runtime: 1:19:33.
  https://www.bitchute.com/video/NzFgo7zN2CA6/.
  Video.
  Dr. Kory reports the situation surrounding ivermectin research.  “It’s criminal.  It’s literally criminal.”
• 
  May 26, 2021. R. Clinton Ohlers. “‘Literally Criminal’: Suppressing Data on Ivermectin Cost ‘Half a Million Lives’, Doctor Charges.” WorldTribume.
  https://www.worldtribune.com/literally-criminal-suppressing-data-on-ivermectin-cost-half-a-million-lives-doctor-charges/.
  News.
• 
  December 9, 2021. “Researcher Andrew Hill’s Conflict: A $40 Million Gates Foundation Grant vs a Half Million Human Lives.” World Tribune.
  https://www.worldtribune.com/researcher-andrew-hills-conflict-a-40-million-gates-foundation-grant-vs-a-half-million-human-lives/.
  News.
• 
  December 12, 2021. “The Case of Dr. Andrew Hill: Was Their Unethical Activity Associated with His Ivermectin Meta-Analysis or Just Another Drug Dev Day?” Covid Strategies.
  https://www.covidstrategies.org/the-case-of-dr-andrew-hill-was-their-unethical-activity-associated-with-his-ivermectin-meta-analysis-or-just-another-drug-dev-day/.
  Blog.
• 
  December 14, 2021. Mark Trozzi. “Dr Andrew Hill. $40 Million. 504,000 People Die.” Dr. Trozzi.
  https://drtrozzi.org/2021/12/14/dr-andrew-hill-40-million-504000-people-die/.
  Blog.

Related:

• 
  November 16, 2021. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health. Skyhorse.
  https://www.amazon.com/Real-Anthony-Fauci-Democracy-Childrens-ebook/dp/B08X5YWRRP/.
  Book.
  If you like the work I have done on this site, this book is essential reading.  Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a lawyer who has been investigating Anthony Fauci for a long time.  In addition to extensive citations, the book contains information obtained from interviews Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has personally conducted.  And because he is a lawyer, he knows the questions to ask to obtain the information needed for a legal case.  The narrative style of this book fills in details in a way that this blog cannot do as well.

See also, on this site:

• Reiner Fuellmich interviews Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
• WHO Chief Scientist charged with causing the deaths of Indian citizens by misleading them about Ivermectin.
• Nobel Prize awarded for work with ivermectin and artemisinin

For comparison, Dr. Zelenko uses a normal dose of HCQ in his COVID-19 treatment protocol.

According to David Jayne, professor of clinical autoimmunity at Cambridge University:

“Hydroxychloroquine overdose is associated with cardiovascular, neurological, and other toxicities, occurring with doses over 1500 mg, and higher doses are associated with fatality.”

In an article for the BMJ found here co-head of the Recovery Trial Martin Landray explained:

“The dose comes from modelling by Nick White, professor of tropical medicine at the University of Oxford, and his team, who have extensive experience with this drug.”

Sources:

• 
  October 15, 2020. WHO Solidarity Trial Consortium, ` Pan, Richard Peto, Quarraisha Abdool Karim, Marissa Alejandria, Ana Maria Henao-Restrepo, César Hernández García, et al. “Repurposed Antiviral Drugs for COVID-19 –Interim WHO SOLIDARITY Trial Results.” MedRxiv, October, 2020.10.15.20209817.
  https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.15.20209817.
  Research Journal, World Health Organization.
• 
  March 13, 2020. “WHO R&D Blueprint, COVID-19: Therapeutics Working Group Consultation on the Potential Role of Chloroquine in Clinical Management.” Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
  https://www.who.int/blueprint/priority-diseases/key-action/RD-Blueprint-expert-group-on-CQ-call-Mar-13-2020.pdf.
  World Health Organization, PDF.
• 
  February 15, 2021. Edward Hendrie. “Doctors Poisoned Test Patients to Falsely Show That Hydroxychloroquine Is Not Safe and Effective.” Great Mountain Publishing.
  https://greatmountainpublishing.com/2021/02/15/doctors-poisoned-test-patients-to-falsely-show-that-hydroxychloroquine-is-not-safe-and-effective/.
  Blog.
  Article includes link to study.

Similar study conducted in UK:

• 
  2020. Frank Atherton, Catherine Calderwood, Michael McBride, Chris Whitty, and Stephan Powis. “Novel Coronavirus: Clinical Trials.” Letter CEM/CMO/2020/012. UK: NHS.
  https://www.recoverytrial.net/files/professional-downloads/the-importance-of-covid-19-clinical-trials.pdf.
  Research Journal, PDF.
• 
  April 1, 2020. “REMAP-CAP: Randomized, Embedded, Multifactorial Adaptive Platform Trial for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: COVID-19 Antiviral Therapy Domain-Specific Appendix Version 2.0.”
  local copy.
  Research Journal, PDF.
• 
  July 8, 2020. Jacqui Wise, and Rebecca Coombes. “Covid-19: The inside Story of the RECOVERY Trial.” BMJ 370 (July): m2670.
  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2670.
  Research Journal.
• 
  June 28, 2021. David James. “Chris Whitty Gave the Order to Give Alleged Covid-19 Patients Lethal Doses of Hydroxychloroquine to Both Kill Them and Sabotage Trials.” The Daily Exposé.
  https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/06/28/chris-whitty-gave-the-order-to-give-alleged-covid-19-patients-lethal-doses-of-hydroxychloroquine-to-both-kill-them-and-sabotage-trials/.
  Blog.

Related:

• 
  May 2017. C. Merino Argumánez, I. Sáez de La Fuente, Z. Molina Collado, D. Suárez Pita, B. Mestre Gómez, and J.A. Sanchez Izquierdo. “Hydroxychloroquine, a Potentially Lethal Drug.” Medicina Intensiva (English Edition) 41 (4): 257–59.
  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2016.05.003.
  Research Journal.
  This article has an alarming title that might worry someone skimming the journal.  But the reader will quickly find out that this article is about someone who took 42 tablets of 200mg hydroxychloroquine while attempting suicide.
• 
  July 28, 2020. Xueting Yao, Fei Ye, Miao Zhang, Cheng Cui, Baoying Huang, Peihua Niu, Xu Liu, et al. “In Vitro Antiviral Activity and Projection of Optimized Dosing Design of Hydroxychloroquine for the Treatment of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).” Clinical Infectious Diseases 71 (15): 732–39.
  https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa237.
  Research Journal.
• 
  April 22, 2022. Zach Heilman. “Fraudulent Studies And Arson: Bill Gates & Company Did Everything Possible To Kill Early Treatment [VIDEO].” Red Voice Media. Runtime of embedded video: 5:56.
  https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/04/fraudulent-studies-and-arson-bill-gates-company-did-everything-possible-to-kill-early-treatment-video/.
  News, Video.

See also, on this site:

• Dr. Vladimir Zelenko publishes his COVID-19 treatment protocol.

On the 20th of April this year we the undersigned, issued a 27-page ‘Request for Investigation’ (Request), to the International Criminal Court (ICC) at The Hague, alleging that certain members of the UK government and its advisors, were complicit in genocide, crimes against humanity and breaches of the Nuremberg Code.

On the 28th of April 2021 we received a formal acknowledgement from the ICC and were assigned a case number (143/21). Unlike some other countries, our Request has not been rejected within a few weeks of submission, but neither has it been formally accepted and so the status of our Request has effectively been in limbo for the past few months.

Notwithstanding the above, we have continued to collect and review any new research and evidence that could be used in our ICC claim should it be accepted for investigation and we have also been actively establishing connections with lawyers and research scientists from around the world.

Given the very substantial amount of new evidence and information that has come to light since we originally issued our Request in April, we made the decision to issue a further claim to the ICC. We are very pleased to have secured sworn affidavits from leading experts, who are in the first instance: the research scientist and nuclear cardiologist Dr Richard M. Fleming, the Nobel Laureate virologist Professor Luc A. Montagnier and Dr Kevin W. McCairn, a neuroscientist and expert on neurological disease.

We now have compelling evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ are deliberately engineered bioweapons which have been released in two phases on the unsuspecting peoples of the world. We are particularly pleased that we have kindly been given exclusive access to an advance copy of Dr Richard M. Fleming’s new book, Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon? A Scientific and Forensic Investigation, which we believe will provide incontrovertible evidence to the ICC of the bioweapon nature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the so-called COVID-19 vaccines.

We have also been in discussions with lawyers from several other countries, about the possibility of amalgamating in order to submit a combined Request to the ICC. We are pleased to announce that we have now been joined by lawyers who have filed ICC Requests from Slovakia, France and the Czech Republic and on the 12th of August 2021, we sent a letter to the ICC requesting that we be allowed to submit a joint claim. At the same time we also submitted preliminary evidence for the allegations which are common to us all, whilst asking to reserve the right to have investigated by the ICC, the claims specific to our individual countries, eg. re the UK, we have requested an examination of the genocide of the elderly that took place in care homes and hospitals and the inappropriate use of midazolam and morphine. We have also requested in our joint claim, that there be an immediate moratorium on the entire COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ program in all four of our countries and an end to the testing of asymptomatic people.

We now await the decision of the ICC as to whether a) they will allow in principle a joint claim by several countries to be made and b) they will accept our joint ‘Request for Investigation’.

Given the extremely serious nature of the situation that pertains in all four of our countries with regards to escalating medical apartheid, the loss of basic freedoms and rights and the ever-increasing, very high number of deaths and serious adverse events suffered by recipients of COVID-19 ‘vaccines’, we have brought to the attention of the ICC the urgent need for the Court to act swiftly and without further delay and to this end we have requested a meeting at The Hague as soon as is practicable.

Whilst we await a response from the ICC, we continue to be in discussions with lawyers in other countries who have not yet filed their individual Requests to the ICC, but who have indicated they wish to join us and we intend to give them our every assistance.

We will issue another update as and when we have further news. In the meantime, we thank each and every person who is helping in the fight for truth, justice and freedom and indeed for the very future of humanity, against the forces of immense evil.

“But let justice roll down like waters, and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream”.

Kaira S. McCallum

Melinda C. Mayne

London

At this time, the case is not visible on the site of the International Criminal Court.

Anyone who has issued a mandate or edict is a potential defendant in this case.

• 
  May 14, 2021. “‘UK Government’ and ‘Corrupt Scientific Advisors’ Are to Be Tried for ‘Crimes against Humanity’ and ‘Genocide.’” The Exposé.
  https://theexpose.uk/2021/05/14/uk-government-and-corrupt-scientific-advisors-are-to-be-tried-for-crimes-against-humanity-and-mass-murder/.
  News.
• 
  May 21, 2021. “Lawyers and Medical Experts Worldwide Say They Have All the Evidence They Need to Convict WHO, CDC, PHE, Bill Gates and World Leaders of ‘Crimes against Humanity.’” The Exposé.
  https://theexpose.uk/2021/05/21/lawyers-and-medical-experts-worldwide-say-they-have-all-the-evidence-they-need-to-convict-who-cdc-phe-bill-gates-and-world-leaders-of-crimes-against-humanity/.
  News.
  This article is about three different efforts to bring cases to court.
• 
  August 17, 2021. Kaira S McCallum, and Melinda C Mayne. “Additional Claim Made to the International Criminal Court.” The Exposé.
  https://theexpose.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Press-release-17th-of-August-2021-Copy.pdf.
  Law, PDF.
• 
  August 18, 2021. “Lawyers Worldwide Submit New Evidence to International Criminal Court Alleging World Leaders & Scientific Advisors Have Used Covid-19 & the Injections to Commit Genocide and Crimes against Humanity.” The Exposé.
  https://theexpose.uk/2021/08/18/lawyers-submit-new-evidence-to-icc-alleging-world-leaders-have-committed-genocide/.
  News.
• 
  August 22, 2021. “New Evidence, Including a Sworn Affidavit from Prof. Luc A. Montagnier, Has Been Submitted to the International Criminal Court Alleging World Governments Are Complicit in Genocide and Crimes against Humanity.” The Exposé.
  https://theexpose.uk/2021/08/22/new-evidence-submitted-icc-alleging-world-governments-committed-gonocide/.
  News.
• 
  September 7, 2021. Dr Richard M. Fleming. Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon?: A Scientific and Forensic Investigation. Skyhorse.
  https://www.amazon.com/COVID-19-Bioweapon-Scientific-investigation-Childrens/dp/1510770194/.
  Book, Expert.
  This book was submitted as evidence.
• 
  September 17, 2021. Jonathan Walker. “Case Filed Against COVID-19 Vaccines in International Criminal Court, Rising Infections in Vaccinated.” Vision Times.
  https://www.visiontimes.com/2021/09/17/case-filed-against-covid-19-vaccines-in-international-criminal-court-rising-infections-in-vaccinated.html.
  News.
• 
  September 26, 2021. “Holocaust Survivors Join Lawyers, Dr Fleming, and Prof Luc Montagnier in Demanding the International Criminal Court Charge World Governments with Crimes against Humanity, Genocide, and Breaches of the Nuremberg Code.” The Exposé.
  https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/26/holocaust-survivors-dr-fleming-prof-motagnier-icc-genocide-crimes-against-humanity/.
  News.
• 
  October 4, 2021. “The International Criminal Court Could Begin Criminal Prosecutions, with Your Help, of World Leaders & Scientific Advisers for Using Covid-19 & the Injections to Commit Genocide & Crimes against Humanity – Lawyers Worldwide, Dr Fleming & Prof. Luc Montagnier Urgently Need Your Help to Make It Happen.” The Exposé.
  https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/04/international-criminal-court-to-begin-criminal-prosecution-of-world-leaders-for-covid-genocide-with-your-help/.
  News.
• 
  October 12, 2021. Alex Newman and Richard Fleming. “COVID Criminals to Face ‘Crimes Against Humanity’ Charges: Dr. Fleming.” The New American.
  https://thenewamerican.com/covid-criminals-to-face-crimes-against-humanity-charges-dr-fleming/.
  News, Video, Expert.
• 
  October 15, 2021. Message from Nazi Concentration Camps Survivors, Read by a Lawyer – to International Criminal Court. tamir turgal. Runtime: 18:20.
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O3yYfcKCSQ.
  Video.

Related:

• 
  “Welcome to the International Criminal Court.” International Criminal Court.
  https://www.icc-cpi.int/.
  International Criminal Court.