Pandemic Timeline

Uncategorized

Dr. Buckhaults testifies before South Carolina Senate

Tags:

University of South Carolina Professor Dr. Phillip Buckhaults testifies before South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Ad-Hoc Committee on DHEC.

— Video description, SC Senate Hearing – USC Professor Dr. Phillip Buckhaults

“The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA. It’s not just mRNA, it’s got bits of DNA in it.” Prof. Buckhaults said.

A colleague who was in charge of the vaccination programme in Columbia, South Carolina,  kept all the Pfizer vials, containing remnants of the contents, from the two batches that were used.  From the remnants, Prof. Buckhaults sequenced all the DNA that was in these vials. “I can see what’s in [the vaccines] and it’s surprising that there’s any DNA in there. And you can kind of work out what it is and how it got there and I’m kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this both in terms of human health and biology,” he said.

“This DNA, in my view, it could be causing some of the rare, but serious, side effects like death from cardiac arrest.

“This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix … we do this in the lab all the time; we take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex, like the Pfizer vaccine is in, we pour it onto cells and a lot of it gets into the cells.  And a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes a permanent fixture of the cell.  It’s not just a temporary thing.  It is in that cell from now on and all of its progeny from now on and forever more …  So, that’s why I’m kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It’s different from RNA because it can be permanent.”

⋮

“The pieces are very small because during the process they chopped them up to try to make them go away – but they actually increased the hazard of genome modification in the process.”

⋮

He explained that this process was not the same as the process that was in the vaccines used to gain emergency authorisation (“EUA”). So, there was no DNA in the batches used for the trials before the mass covid injection campaigns. The problem with DNA contamination only occurred when Pfizer scaled up production for the administration of millions/billions of doses to the public after it had gained EUA.

⋮

The hundreds of billions of pieces of plasmid DNA are encapsulated in the lipid nanoparticles so it’s ready to be delivered into the cell. “This is a bad idea,” he said. “[The DNA is] basically packaged in a synthetic virus able to dump its contents into a cell.”

— Dr. Phillip Buckhaults

Listen all the way to the end [of the presentation by Dr. Phillip Buckhaults]: the questions posed by the hearing participants are very good.

— Jessica Rose

Myself, Steve, Denis and Norman have all been labeled Anti-vaxxers by the narrative police, but people who stand without this label are taking this dsDNA contamination very seriously.

If you don’t know who Wafik is, his Google Scholar page is a good place to start. When the Director of the Cancer Center at Brown University takes note, the FDA should listen.

— Kevin McKernan

I listened to Dr. Phil Buckhaults’ over 30 minute testimony and Q and A in South Carolina and saw good science raising concerns about contamination of COVID mRNA vaccine with DNA.

South Carolina is fortunate to have @P_J_Buckhaults who raises safety concerns related to billions of pieces of DNA in each @pfizer vaccine vial. He suggests that better @US_FDA, @CDCgov and State oversight is needed.

He explains how pieces of naked DNA allowed in protein vaccines at a certain threshold was not so problematic in a different era but that with encapsulation in liposomes they can now easily get into cells. If they get into cells they can integrate in the genome which is permanent, heritable and has a theoretical risk of causing cancer depending on where in the genome they integrate.

There is need for more research into what happens in stem cells and I would add germ-line, heart, brain etc.

I am also concerned about prolonged production of spike for months with the paeudouridine in the more stable RNA. Is it too much or just the right amount (for everyone?) This point was raised by @P_McCulloughMD

Blood clots, myocarditis, cardiac arrests and other adverse effects are documented. To have adequate informed consent, individuals need to know risks versus benefits and this is part of the concern.

As @P_J_Buckhaults says, it may be OK for elderly at high risk of death from COVID but perhaps less so for younger people.

Do athletes need better precautions? Why are some at higher risk for bad outcomes? Is it 5%, 10% and why? @P_McCulloughMD has raised those issues.

@theNASEM @NIH

SC Senate Hearing – USC Professor Dr. Phillip Buckhaults

https://youtu.be/IEWHhrHiiTY

— Wafik S. El-Deiry, MD, PhD, FACP

Sources:

Related:

See also, on this site:

Comments are closed.