Pandemic Timeline

Judgments, Uncategorized

A court in Sicily, Italy declares mandatory vaccination to be unconstitutional

Tags:

“Who would determine the percentage of disposable citizens? It is indisputable. Otherwise, it results in Nazism.”

Sicily’s Court of Administrative Justice has ruled that Italy’s mandatory Covid vaccination obligation is unconstitutional. The court stated that the experimental mRNA treatments intended to protect the public from Covid have been shown to cause “serious or fatal adverse effects.” The court explains that even if such fatalities are rare, a single death is enough to render the mandate unconstitutional.

The Sicilian ruling passes the decision to the Constitutional Court, which will now have to rule on the issue.

— RAIR Foundation

Please read the sentence carefully !!!

The Administrative Court of the Sicily Region defines the question of the constitutionality of the vaccination obligation as “NOT UNFOUNDED” (or FOUNDED)

Among the causes that are indicated at the basis of the possible non-constitutionality of the vaccination obligation are:

🔥the lack of true in-depth vaccine triage;
🔥the lack of involvement of general practitioners in the testing phase;
🔥the fact that there is no absolute and necessary certainty that the vaccine will not adversely affect health, a necessary feature for a mandatory vaccine;
🔥the NON-exclusion of informed consent is then evaluated to be examined at a constitutional level, i.e. it is useless to ask for consent if the vaccine is mandatory.

— LaVeritaOccultata, as translated by Google

Video transcript:

I have good, excellent news. Let’s wait for more people to connect, and we are ready to start.

All right, this is a very important ruling. It is the ruling made by the Court of Administrative Justice of Sicily. The Court has forwarded the case to the Constitutional Court, concerning the unconstitutionality of mandatory vaccination imposed, in this specific case, on the medical staff. But the explanatory statements affect mandatory vaccination in its entirety.

According to the Court of Administrative Justice of Sicily, mandatory vaccination is unconstitutional. This 53-page ruling will surely put pressure on the Constitutional Court. The latter will not be able to preserve the mandatory vaccination and the Government’s stances, unless it makes a politicized ruling. They already acted upon it, nominating Giuliano Amato, a politician, as president of the Constitutional Court. Frankly, they couldn’t have provided better explanatory statements.

A very interesting part is the data from Eudravigilance, which is the pharmacovigilance database of the European Union, whose data are really shocking. The ruling says: “The data which have been collected by the European database reveal that by the end of January 2022, 570 million Pfizer doses had been administered within the EU, so far. In relation to them, 582,000 cases of adverse effects were reported, 7,000 of which had a fatal outcome.” That was Pfizer.

As for AstraZeneca, “among 69 million doses, 244,000 cases of adverse effects were reported, 1,447 of which had a fatal outcome.”

Then they mention Moderna, too. 139 million doses, 150,000 adverse reactions, 834 of which had a fatal outcome.

Then Janssen. 19 million doses, 40,766 cases reported, 279 of which were fatal.

“Most of the aforementioned side effects are undoubtedly mild. But among those effects, there are also serious pathologies which in some cases are likely to compromise the vaccinated patient’s health irreversibly,” and that is exactly the point. Causing disability, or in the most unfortunate cases, death. So therefore it is doubtful whether such medical products, whose data about the adverse reactions are being collected, fulfill the aforementioned constitutional requirement.”

And then they wrote nine spectacular lines. And I wonder what Giuliano Amato will write about those lines. Since he is a politicized person, and in line with the Government’s stance.

“It is true that the cases of serious adverse effects turn out to be a small portion.” Please, listen to this: “nevertheless, the criterion set by the Constitutional Court,” “The criterion set by the Constitutional Court for compulsory medical treatments to be enforced is not likely to include a quantitative evaluation. So the lawfulness of a mandatory vaccination is to be excluded if it uses products whose effects on the vaccinated patients’ health exceed the threshold of normal tolerability. Which cannot include the risk of serious or fatal adverse effects, even if these are small portion in relation to the vaccinated population.”

So, even if they are few, one fatal effect suffices to make this inadmissible. “And even in the case we accept the risk of — albeit rare — fatal adverse effects, this criterion would have sensitive ethical implications.” For instance, who would determine the percentage of disposable citizens? It is indisputable. Otherwise it results in Nazism. It is indisputable. If the Constitutional Court rules against this judgment, it means its members are servants of politics. They are politicians, not jurists. A jurist cannot but reach the same conclusion as this ruling. If the members of the court rule differently, it means they are not ignorant, of course, but surely someone extremely biased and politicized. Someone to dismiss faster than the speed of light. So we should challenge them on this matter, and on the duty to state grounds.

In other words, this Italian judge has ruled that if even one person has died or suffered severe injury from a medical procedure, that procedure cannot be made mandatory.

So how does one determine the disposable people?  This is what happened when Abraham and the LORD discussed the matter.  Abraham got the number down to 10.  But in the end, angels took Lot and his family out of the city.

Genesis 18:22-33 (ESV)

Abraham Intercedes for Sodom

22  So the men turned from there and went toward Sodom, but Abraham still stood before the LORD.
23  Then Abraham drew near and said, “Will you indeed sweep away the righteous with the wicked?
24  Suppose there are fifty righteous within the city. Will you then sweep away the place and not spare it for the fifty righteous who are in it?
25  Far be it from you to do such a thing, to put the righteous to death with the wicked, so that the righteous fare as the wicked! Far be that from you! Shall not the Judge of all the earth do what is just?”
26  And the LORD said, “If I find at Sodom fifty righteous in the city, I will spare the whole place for their sake.”
27  Abraham answered and said, “Behold, I have undertaken to speak to the Lord, I who am but dust and ashes.
28  Suppose five of the fifty righteous are lacking. Will you destroy the whole city for lack of five?” And he said, “I will not destroy it if I find forty-five there.”
29  Again he spoke to him and said, “Suppose forty are found there.” He answered, “For the sake of forty I will not do it.”
30  Then he said, “Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak. Suppose thirty are found there.” He answered, “I will not do it, if I find thirty there.”
31  He said, “Behold, I have undertaken to speak to the Lord. Suppose twenty are found there.” He answered, “For the sake of twenty I will not destroy it.”
32  Then he said, “Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak again but this once. Suppose ten are found there.” He answered, “For the sake of ten I will not destroy it.”
33  And the LORD went his way, when he had finished speaking to Abraham, and Abraham returned to his place.

Genesis 19:15-16 (ESV)

15  As morning dawned, the angels urged Lot, saying, “Up! Take your wife and your two daughters who are here, lest you be swept away in the punishment of the city.”
16  But he lingered. So the men seized him and his wife and his two daughters by the hand, the LORD being merciful to him, and they brought him out and set him outside the city.

Sources:

Comments are closed.