33. Another example of human bias run amok was the reaction to this tweet by Trump. Many Trump tweets led to extensive internal debates, and this one was no different.
34. In a surreal exchange, Jim Baker, at the time Twitter’s Deputy General Counsel, asks why telling people to not be afraid wasn’t a violation of Twitter’s Covid-19 misinformation policy.
35. Yoel Roth, Twitter’s former head of Trust & Safety, had to explain that optimism wasn’t misinformation.
— David Zweig
Sources:
- December 26, 2022. David Zweig [@davidzweig]. “1. THREAD: THE TWITTER FILES: HOW TWITTER RIGGED THE COVID DEBATE – By Censoring Info That Was True but Inconvenient to U.S. Govt. Policy – By Discrediting Doctors and Other Experts Who Disagreed – By Suppressing Ordinary Users, Including Some Sharing the CDC’s *own Data*.” Tweet. Twitter.
https://twitter.com/davidzweig/status/1607378386338340867.
Social Media.
- December 26, 2022. David Zweig [@davidzweig]. “33. Another Example of Human Bias Run Amok Was the Reaction to This Tweet by Trump. Many Trump Tweets Led to Extensive Internal Debates, and This One Was No Different. Https://T.Co/KQs1ADPVAk.” Tweet. Twitter.
https://twitter.com/davidzweig/status/1607389968678125577.
Social Media.
- December 26, 2022. David Zweig [@davidzweig]. “34. In a Surreal Exchange, Jim Baker, at the Time Twitter’s Deputy General Counsel, Asks Why Telling People to Not Be Afraid Wasn’t a Violation of Twitter’s Covid-19 Misinformation Policy. Https://T.Co/SxvOKcvaT7.” Tweet. Twitter.
https://twitter.com/davidzweig/status/1607390165370109953.
Social Media.
- December 26, 2022. David Zweig [@davidzweig]. “35. Yoel Roth, Twitter’s Former Head of Trust & Safety, Had to Explain That Optimism Wasn’t Misinformation. Https://T.Co/1pj8uvzWR1.” Tweet. Twitter.
https://twitter.com/davidzweig/status/1607390483696979968.
Social Media.
- “James A. Baker (Government Attorney).” In Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=James_A._Baker_(government_attorney).
Reference.
- “Definition of TERRORISM.” Merriam-Webster.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terrorism.
Reference.
- “Definition of TERROR.” Merriam-Webster.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terror.
Reference.
- “Definition of FRAUD.” Merriam-Webster.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fraud.
Reference.
- “Fraud.” In The Free Dictionary.
https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Fraud.
Reference.
- “18 U.S. Code § 2331 – Definitions.” LII / Legal Information Institute.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2331.
University.
See also, on this site:
This concern that “Don’t be afraid of Covid” might be a violation of COVID-19 policy implies that Jim Baker believes that being afraid of COVID-19 is part of the narrative.
If so, then is terrorism part of the COVID-19 narrative?
Terrorizing people is against the law. Terrorism is defined in the law as follows:
The actions taken during the COVID-19 pandemic are consistent with the legal definition of terrorism.
Media coverage was designed to scare people into taking the so-called “vaccines”. Coercion was used to get people to take the “vaccines”, usually as threats of loss of employment or education or freedom to travel, though social pressure was also used. The “vaccines” have been shown to be dangerous.
Furthermore, fraud in the form of lies about efficacy and concealment of data showing otherwise was used to protect the narrative.
Fraud vitiates everything. Any deals of protection made to the perpetrators of the terrorism that is the COVID-19 pandemic are voided by the acts of fraud.