This Supreme Court decision allows for the patenting of living organisms, which had been forbidden prior to this decision.
From the filing:
In 1972, respondent [Ananda M.] Chakrabarty, a microbiologist, filed a patent application, assigned to the General Electric Co. The application asserted 36 claims related to Chakrabarty’s invention of “a bacterium from the genus Pseudomonas containing therein at least two stable energy-generating plasmids, each of said plasmids providing a separate hydrocarbon degradative pathway.” This human-made, genetically engineered bacterium is capable of breaking down multiple components of crude oil. Because of this property, which is possessed by no naturally occurring bacteria, Chakrabarty’s invention is believed to have significant value for the treatment of oil spills.
Source:
- June 16, 1980. US Supreme Court. Sidney A. DIAMOND, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Petitioner, v. Ananda M. CHAKRABARTY et al. Cornell Law School: Legal Information Institute.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/447/303.
University, Judgment.
The mRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” have been found to alter DNA. mRNA “vaccines” are now being used in livestock. As the alteration of the DNA of livestock is changed by mRNA “vaccines,” DIAMOND vs. CHAKRABARTY opens the door for the “creators” of the modified livestock to claim ownership of their DNA, just as the medical industry does now with humans. I have personally seen a document claiming ownership of the DNA of a person who had undergone a trial of a gene therapy medication, so I know this to be a fact and not mere conspiracy. Original FDA documentation of the mRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” classified them as gene therapies. SEC filings of the companies that manufacture the “vaccines” characterized their mRNA products as gene therapies, including the “vaccines.” As the “creators” of the DNA claim ownership of the DNA of livestock, this could become a mechanism for the control of the food supply. This is not a trivial matter.