Phil Krause – Pandemic Timeline https://pandemictimeline.com Chronological Sequence of Events Sun, 23 Jan 2022 01:40:21 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 https://pandemictimeline.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Covid-150x150.ico Phil Krause – Pandemic Timeline https://pandemictimeline.com 32 32 Senior FDA leaders stepping down https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/08/senior-fda-leaders-stepping-down/ Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:52 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=4697 Marion Gruber is the Signatory Authority listed on the Emergency Use Authorization. Marion Gruber, director of the FDA’s Office of Vaccines Research & Review, and deputy director Phil Krause will exit the agency in October and November, respectively, according to a letter shared with CNBC by FDA spokeswoman Stephanie Caccomo. A former senior FDA leader…

]]>
Marion Gruber is the Signatory Authority listed on the Emergency Use Authorization.

Marion Gruber, director of the FDA’s Office of Vaccines Research & Review, and deputy director Phil Krause will exit the agency in October and November, respectively, according to a letter shared with CNBC by FDA spokeswoman Stephanie Caccomo.

A former senior FDA leader told Endpoints that they’re departing because they’re frustrated that CDC and their ACIP committee are involved in decisions that they think should be up to the FDA. The former FDAer also said he’s heard they’re upset with CBER director Peter Marks for not insisting that those decisions should be kept inside FDA. What finally did it for them was the White House getting ahead of FDA on booster shots.

Much of the discord within the agency centers on the administration’s decision to push ahead with boosters before FDA’s top scientists had a chance to weigh in.

Their announced plans to depart come as the Biden administration prepares to begin offering Covid vaccine booster shots to the general public the week of Sept. 20.

Meanwhile, Paul Offit, a member of FDA’s vaccine advisory committee, stated of the booster plan that it was “the administration’s booster plan; it wasn’t the FDA’s booster plan. The administration has kind of backed themselves up against the wall a little bit here.”

The booster decision … was made by and announced by the nation’s leading public health officials, including Dr. Walensky, Dr. Fauci, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, Dr. Janet Woodcock —the acting FDA commissioner —Dr. Francis Collins, Dr. Kessler and others. And as our medical experts laid out, having reviewed all the available data, it is in their clinical judgment that it is time to prepare Americans for a booster shot.

“With 50% of its overall budget and 75% of its drug-testing budget coming from industry, the FDA long ago won its notoriety as the most corrupt and pliable of all federal agencies,” said Children’s Health Defense Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

“Now, the White House has torn away its last shred of integrity by ordering top regulators to put politics before science.”

These FDA executives are upset because:

  • Biden said that boosters would be available September 20 without consulting them.
  • The CDC and its ACIP are making decisions that these executives believe belong to the FDA.
  • Their boss, Dr. Peter Marks, was not standing up to Biden and the CDC to protect the FDA’s authority.

There are indications that UK health officials are under pressure as well.  UK health officials are advising against jabs for children, but politicians are pressing forward anyway.

Both resigned FDA executive have since appeared as coauthors of an article in The Lancet.

Sources:

Related:

See also, on this site:

]]>
FDA advisory committee voted 16 to 2 against boosters https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/09/fda-advisory-committee-voted-16-to-2-against-boosters/ Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:30 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=5668 According to Dr. Steve Kirsch, the “elephant in the room” is: People killed > People saved In other words, you are more likely to die from the vaccine than from COVID-19.  See the outtake video and Dr. Steve Kirsch’s slides from the meeting. The FDA held a Vaccine Advisory Committee meeting on September 17, 2021…

]]>

Death:Life ratio provided by Dr. Steve Kirsch, the Executive Director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund

According to Dr. Steve Kirsch, the “elephant in the room” is:

People killed > People saved

In other words, you are more likely to die from the vaccine than from COVID-19.  See the outtake video and Dr. Steve Kirsch’s slides from the meeting.

The FDA held a Vaccine Advisory Committee meeting on September 17, 2021 to discuss authorizing a third Pfizer COVID-19 “booster shot.”

Surprisingly, the FDA allowed dissenting doctors to comment during the open session.

The committee voted 16 to 2 AGAINST recommending the booster shots, and several doctors gave stunning testimony on just how dangerous the already approved shots are. We include the testimony of 3 different doctors from the 8 hour long meeting here: Dr. Joseph Fraiman, Dr. Steve Kirsch, and Dr. Jessica Rose.

(Note: these doctors were NOT part of the committee voting, but commented during the “open session,” but at least their testimony is now a matter of public record.)

HealthImpactNews, video description

Dr. Joseph Fraiman lamented the fact that the “vaccine hesitant” coming into his emergency room were more educated on the risks of the COVID-19 vaccine than those vaccinated.

 I know many think that vaccine hesitants are dumb, or just misinformed. That’s not at all what I’ve seen.

In fact typically, independent of education level, the vaccine hesitant I’ve met in the ER are more familiar with vaccine studies, and more aware of their own COVID risks than the vaccinated.

For example, many of my nurses have refused the vaccine despite seeing COVID-19 cause more death and devastation than most people have.

I ask them why refuse the vaccine?

They tell me while they’ve seen the first hand dangers of COVID, the elderly, the obese, diabetics; they think their risk is low.

They’re not wrong. A 30-year-old female has about a 1 in 7000 chance of catching COVID and being hospitalized over it.

While the Vaccine Advisory Committee results are a positive step, we must keep in mind:

It is important to understand that this was an “Advisory” committee meeting, and they do not set policy. The FDA could still approve the 3rd Pfizer COVID-19 shot against the recommendation of the Advisory Committee.

My take on the boosters is that the FDA will probably approve them, since the committee recommended them for those 65+. But nobody should be mandating them.  There was enough negative information about the jabs revealed in this meeting that any existing mandates should be cancelled.  With the “Excess Death:Life” ratio being what it is, there is no benefit.

Sources:

See also, on this site:

]]>