Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – Pandemic Timeline https://pandemictimeline.com Chronological Sequence of Events Sun, 29 Oct 2023 01:51:56 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 https://pandemictimeline.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Covid-150x150.ico Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – Pandemic Timeline https://pandemictimeline.com 32 32 Courtney Brown remote views radio signal research at CDC. https://pandemictimeline.com/1997/04/courtney-brown-remote-views-radio-signal-research-at-cdc/ Sat, 12 Apr 1997 00:00:47 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=32 Courtney Brown is assigned to remote view the CDC at the present time, the time of the remote viewing. In Remote Viewing protocols, the viewer does not know what the assignment is until afterward. A statement from his report: There is technology here. One facet of this technology is associated with the transmission of radio…

Read more →

]]>

Courtney Brown is assigned to remote view the CDC at the present time, the time of the remote viewing. In Remote Viewing protocols, the viewer does not know what the assignment is until afterward. A statement from his report:

There is technology here. One facet of this technology is associated with the transmission of radio signals.

— Cosmic Explorers, pp. 78-81.

Though not legal evidence by itself, this does suggest direction for investigation.

Why radio signals? What were they doing with the radio signals?

Source:

 

 

 

]]> The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act is presented https://pandemictimeline.com/2001/12/the-model-state-emergency-health-powers-act-is-presented/ Fri, 21 Dec 2001 00:00:50 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=44 The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act is prepared by The Center for Law and the Public’s Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] The MSEHPA (Model State Emergency Health Powers Act) which was passed by many states in 2002, included provisions that would allow state…

Read more →

]]>

The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act is prepared by The Center for Law and the Public’s Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]

The MSEHPA (Model State Emergency Health Powers Act) which was passed by many states in 2002, included provisions that would allow state health officials to use the state militia to:

Take control of all roads leading into and out of cities and states;

Seize homes, cars, telephones, computers, food, fuel, clothing, firearms and alcoholic beverages for their own use (and not be held liable if these actions result in the destruction of  personal property);

Arrest, imprison and forcibly examine, vaccinate and medicate citizens without consent (and not be held liable if these actions result in your death or injury).

— ce399

Fortunately for the People, the Supremacy Clause in the U.S. Constitution declares that where federal and state laws conflict, federal law supersedes state law.

Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause.  It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions. It prohibits states from interfering with the federal government’s exercise of its constitutional powers, and from assuming any functions that are exclusively entrusted to the federal government. It does not, however, allow the federal government to review or veto state laws before they take effect.

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.
— US Constitution, Article VI, paragraph 2

The National Research Act (also known as The Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects or The Common Rule) is federal law.  The Emergency Health Powers Acts are state laws.  Therefore, none of the Emergency Health Powers Acts can violate the protections provided in the National Research Act.  Please refer to the article about the National Research Act for further details.

Pres. Trump prevented the mandating of COVID-19 vaccines by releasing the vaccines under Emergency Use Authorization while still in testing.  Otherwise, Emergency Health Powers Acts in the various states could have allowed the mandating of the COVID-19 vaccines.  While the vaccines are still in testing, it is a violation of the federal National Research Act for anyone to mandate them.  Families of victims could potentially sue based on violation of the federal National Research Act.

As of August 23, 2021, the Pfizer-BioNTech inoculation is now approved under the brand name Comirnaty. The Comirnaty/Pfizer-BioNTech Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine clearly states that pre-authorization Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and the Comirnaty vaccine are equivalent. Any objections based on the experimental status of this vaccine are now moot. The argument now becomes whether that approval was legal. Dr. Jane Ruby and Karen Kingston both have concerns about the legality of the approval. See the post about the approval for details.

  • Food & Drug Administration
    October 20, 2021. “Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine [Pfizer-BioNTech].” US Food & Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download.
    Food & Drug Administration.
    This document has instructions for healthcare providers who are administering the vaccines.

Sources:

See also, on this site:

Legislation by state.

The following map is provided as a research hint.

This map is probably good as of sometime in 2006.
More states may have passed an Emergency Health Powers Act by now.
http://www.rwjf.org/files/publications/annual/2006/images/chart-publichealth.gif

This list below of links by state is nowhere near complete at this time.  Emergency Health Powers Acts have been enacted in at least 34 states.  Eventually, I will get more of this filled in.

Alabama

Alaska

Arizona

Arkansas

California

Colorado

Connecticut

Delaware

Florida

Georgia

Hawaii

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maine

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Mississippi

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

New York

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

South Carolina

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Vermont

Virginia

Washington

West Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming

 

]]> CDC files patent US7220852: Coronavirus isolated from humans https://pandemictimeline.com/2004/04/cdc-files-patent-7220852-coronavirus-isolated-from-humans/ Mon, 12 Apr 2004 00:00:24 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=1420 Disclosed herein is a newly isolated human coronavirus (SARS-CoV), the causative agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Also provided are the nucleic acid sequence of the SARS-CoV genome and the amino acid sequences of the SARS-CoV open reading frames, as well as methods of using these molecules to detect a SARS-CoV and detect infections…

Read more →

]]>

Disclosed herein is a newly isolated human coronavirus (SARS-CoV), the causative agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Also provided are the nucleic acid sequence of the SARS-CoV genome and the amino acid sequences of the SARS-CoV open reading frames, as well as methods of using these molecules to detect a SARS-CoV and detect infections therewith. Immune stimulatory compositions are also provided, along with methods of their use.

— Patent US7220852B1

From the Reiner/Martin interview:

Coronavirus as a circulating pathogen inside of the viral model that we have is actually not new to the human condition and is not new to the last two decades. It’s actually been part of the sequence of proteins that circulates for quite a long time. But the alleged outbreak that took place in China in 2002, going into 2003 gave rise to a very problematic April 2003 filing by the United States Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. And this topic is of critical importance to get the nuance very precise, because in addition to filing the entire gene sequence on what became SARS Coronavirus, which is actually a violation of 35 US Code Section 101. You cannot patent a naturally occurring substance. The 35 US Code Section 101 violation was patent number 7220852.

— Dr. David Martin at 15:32

According to Dr. David Martin, this is the patent that records the entire gene sequence for the SARS Coronavirus.  All other Coronavirus related patents contain a segment of this sequence.  According to Dr. Martin, the sequence found for SARS CoV 2 is a segment of the original SARS Coronavirus.  This is documented in his report.

Source:

See also, on this site:

Related:

 

 

 

]]> Sequoia Pharmaceuticals files patent US7151163: Antiviral agents for the treatment, control and prevention of infections by coronaviruses https://pandemictimeline.com/2004/04/sequoia-pharmaceuticals-files-patent-7151163-antiviral-agents-for-the-treatment-control-and-prevention-of-infections-by-coronaviruses/ Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:00:20 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=1422 The invention provides compositions and methods that are useful for preventing and treating a coronavirus infection in a subject. More specifically, the invention provides peptides and conjugates and pharmaceutical compositions containing those peptides and conjugates that block fusion of a coronavirus, such as the SARS virus, to a target cell. This blocking mechanism prevents or…

Read more →

]]>

The invention provides compositions and methods that are useful for preventing and treating a coronavirus infection in a subject. More specifically, the invention provides peptides and conjugates and pharmaceutical compositions containing those peptides and conjugates that block fusion of a coronavirus, such as the SARS virus, to a target cell. This blocking mechanism prevents or treats a coronavirus infection, such as a SARS infection, in a subject, such as a human subject.

— Patent US7151163B2

From the Reiner/Martin interview:

Dr David Martin  25:57

The patent in question, the April 28th 2003 patent 7151163, issued to Sequoia Pharmaceuticals has another problem. The problem is it was issued and published before the CDC patent on Coronavirus was actually allowed. So the degree to which the information could have been known by any means other than insider information between those parties is zero. It is not physically possible for you to patent a thing that treats a thing that had not been published, because CDC had paid to keep it secret. This, my friends is the definition of criminal conspiracy racketeering and collusion. This is not a theory. This is evidence. You cannot have information in the future in form [for] a treatment for a thing that did not exist.

Reiner Fuellmich  27:16

This could well blow up into a Rico case, ultimately.

Dr David Martin  27:20

This is, it is a Rico case. It’s not could blow up into it, it is a Rico case. And the Rico pattern, which was established in April of 2003 for the first Coronavirus, was played out to exactly the same schedule when we see SARS CoV 2 show up when we have Moderna getting the spike protein sequence by phone from the vaccine research centre at NIAID prior to the definition of the novel subclade. How do you treat a thing before you actually have the thing?

— Reiner Fuellmich Interviews Dr David Martin

Sources:

Related:

See also, on this site:

 

 

 

]]> PCR test results create false alarm at a hospital https://pandemictimeline.com/2007/01/pcr-test-results-create-false-alarm-at-a-hospital/ Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:00:22 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=4254 Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center thought it had an outbreak of whooping cough.  Nearly 1,000 staff members were given a PCR test.  142 of them came back positive. Later, more definitive testing was done.  Not a single case of whooping cough was confirmed with the definitive test. Instead, it appears that the staff probably had ordinary respiratory…

Read more →

]]>

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center thought it had an outbreak of whooping cough.  Nearly 1,000 staff members were given a PCR test.  142 of them came back positive.

Later, more definitive testing was done.  Not a single case of whooping cough was confirmed with the definitive test. Instead, it appears that the staff probably had ordinary respiratory diseases such as the common cold.

Of course, that leads to the question of why rely on them at all. “At face value, obviously they shouldn’t be doing it,” Dr. Perl said. But, she said, often when answers are needed and an organism like the pertussis bacterium is finicky and hard to grow in a laboratory, “you don’t have great options.”

Proverbs 20:10 (CEV)

Two things the Lord hates
are dishonest scales
and dishonest measures.

Sources:

]]> The CDC files patent US7776521: Coronavirus isolated from humans https://pandemictimeline.com/2007/05/the-cdc-files-patent-7776521-coronavirus-isolated-from-humans/ Mon, 14 May 2007 00:00:30 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=1921 Disclosed herein is a newly isolated human coronavirus (SARS-CoV), the causative agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Also provided are the nucleic acid sequence of the SARS-CoV genome and the amino acid sequences of the SARS-CoV open reading frames, as well as methods of using these molecules to detect a SARS-CoV and detect infections…

Read more →

]]>

Disclosed herein is a newly isolated human coronavirus (SARS-CoV), the causative agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Also provided are the nucleic acid sequence of the SARS-CoV genome and the amino acid sequences of the SARS-CoV open reading frames, as well as methods of using these molecules to detect a SARS-CoV and detect infections therewith. Immune stimulatory compositions are also provided, along with methods of their use.

— Patent US7776521B1

From the Reiner/Martin interview:

Dr David Martin  15:32

The 35 US Code Section 101 violation was patent number 7220852. Now, that patent also had a series of derivative patents associated with it, these are our patent applications that were broken apart because they were of multiple patentable subject matter. But these include US Patent 46592703p, which is actually a very interesting designation, US Patent 7776521. These patents not only covered the gene sequence of SARS Coronavirus, but also covered the means of detecting it using RT-PCR. Now, the reason why that’s a problem is if you actually both own the patent on the gene itself, and you own the patent on its detection, you have a cutting advantage to being able to control 100 percent of the provenance of not only the virus itself, but also its detection, meaning you have entire scientific and message control. And this patent sought by the CDC was allegedly justified by their public relations team as being sought so that everyone would be free to be able to research Coronavirus. The only problem with that statement is it’s a lie and the reason why it’s a lie is because the patent office not once but twice rejected the patent on the gene sequence as unpatentable because the gene sequence was already in the public domain. In other words, prior to CDCs filing for a patent, the patent office found 99.9 percent identity with the already existing Coronavirus recorded in the public domain, and over the rejection of the patent examiner. And after having to pay an appeal fine in 2006 and 2007, the CDC overrode the patent office’s rejection of their patent and ultimately in 2007 got the patent on SARS Coronavirus. Now, every public statement that CDC has made that said that this was in the public interest is falsifiable by their own paid bribe to the patent office. This is not something that’s subtle, and to make matters worse they paid an additional fee to keep their application private. Last time I checked, if you’re trying to make information available for the public research, you would not pay a fee to keep the information private. I wish I could have made up anything I just said, but all of that is available in the public patent archive record which any member of the public can review. And the Public PAIR, as it’s called at the United States Patent Office, has not only the evidence but the actual documents which I have in my possession. Now, this is critically important. It’s critically important because fact checkers have repeatedly stated that the novel Coronavirus, designated as SARS CoV 2 is in fact distinct from the CDC patent. And here’s both the genetic and the patent problem. If you look at the gene sequence that is filed by CDC in 2003, again in 2005 and then again in 2006, what you find is identity in somewhere between 89 to 99 percent of the sequence overlaps that have been identified in what’s called the novel subclade of SARS CoV 2. What we know is that the core designation of SARS Coronavirus, which is actually the clade of the betacoronavirus family and the subclade that has been called SARS CoV 2 have to overlap from a taxonomic point of view. You cannot have SARS designation on a thing without it first being SARS. So the disingenuous fact checking that has been done saying that somehow or another CDC has nothing to do with this particular patent, or this particular pathogen, is beyond both the literal credibility of the published sequences. And it’s also beyond credulity when it comes to the ICTV taxonomy because it very clearly states that this is in fact a sub clade of the clade called SARS Coronavirus. Now, what’s important is on the 28th of April, and listen to the date very carefully because this date is problematic.

Sources:

Related:

See also, on this site:

 

 

]]> Report: fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported to the VAERS. https://pandemictimeline.com/2010/09/grant-final-report-review-of-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system-vaers-determines-that-fewer-than-1-of-vaccine-adverse-events-are-reported/ Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:07 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=98 Grant Final Report: Review of Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) determines that fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Even if we assume that the COVID-19 situation has created increased awareness of VAERS, we can assume that adverse reactions are still grossly underreported. If nothing has changed, this means that statistics derived…

Read more →

]]>

Grant Final Report: Review of Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) determines that fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Even if we assume that the COVID-19 situation has created increased awareness of VAERS, we can assume that adverse reactions are still grossly underreported. If nothing has changed, this means that statistics derived from VAERS can be multiplied by 100.

In addition to being grossly underreported, it appears that the data in VAERS may not be entirely up to date.  It appears that the CDC is behind in their reporting of adverse reactions.

According to Dr. David Martin, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 requires that the VAERS database be maintained accurately.  This is a statutory requirement for maintaining immunity.

The following shows how VAERS data compares with the Pfizer clinical trial data.

Page 35 of CCCA report: Roll Out Surveillance: You Don’t Find What You Don’t Look For
Left side chart is the Pfizer clinical trials. Right side chart is the passive surveillance of the general population post-rollout.

Sources:

Related:

See also, on this site:

 

 

]]> The CDC publishes “Preparedness 101: Zombie Apocalypse” https://pandemictimeline.com/2011/05/the-cdc-publishes-preparedness-101-zombie-apocalypse/ Mon, 16 May 2011 00:00:25 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=5148 The CDC is not the only one considering this possibility.  Check out item 42.10 from the “AWS [Amazon Web Services] Service Terms, Last Updated: September 2, 2021”: 42.10. Acceptable Use; Safety-Critical Systems. Your use of the Lumberyard Materials must comply with the AWS Acceptable Use Policy. The Lumberyard Materials are not intended for use with life-critical…

Read more →

]]>

The CDC is not the only one considering this possibility.  Check out item 42.10 from the “AWS [Amazon Web Services] Service Terms, Last Updated: September 2, 2021”:

42.10. Acceptable Use; Safety-Critical Systems. Your use of the Lumberyard Materials must comply with the AWS Acceptable Use Policy. The Lumberyard Materials are not intended for use with life-critical or safety-critical systems, such as use in operation of medical equipment, automated transportation systems, autonomous vehicles, aircraft or air traffic control, nuclear facilities, manned spacecraft, or military use in connection with live combat. However, this restriction will not apply in the event of the occurrence (certified by the United States Centers for Disease Control or successor body) of a widespread viral infection transmitted via bites or contact with bodily fluids that causes human corpses to reanimate and seek to consume living human flesh, blood, brain or nerve tissue and is likely to result in the fall of organized civilization.

If early indications that the jabs detach the soul from Spirit are true, then it is possible that lack of Spirit connection could eventually allow people to degrade into the state of a zombie.  For those who choose to maintain their God connection, God offers His protection.

Psalm 91 (NKJV)

1 He who dwells in the secret place of the Most High
Shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty.
2 I will say of the Lord, “He is my refuge and my fortress;
My God, in Him I will trust.”

3 Surely He shall deliver you from the snare of the fowler
And from the perilous pestilence.
4 He shall cover you with His feathers,
And under His wings you shall take refuge;
His truth shall be your shield and buckler.
5 You shall not be afraid of the terror by night,
Nor of the arrow that flies by day,
6 Nor of the pestilence that walks in darkness,
Nor of the destruction that lays waste at noonday.

7 A thousand may fall at your side,
And ten thousand at your right hand;
But it shall not come near you.
8 Only with your eyes shall you look,
And see the reward of the wicked.

9 Because you have made the Lord, who is my refuge,
Even the Most High, your dwelling place,
10 No evil shall befall you,
Nor shall any plague come near your dwelling;
11 For He shall give His angels charge over you,
To keep you in all your ways.
12 In their hands they shall bear you up,
Lest you dash your foot against a stone.
13 You shall tread upon the lion and the cobra,
The young lion and the serpent you shall trample underfoot.

14 “Because he has set his love upon Me, therefore I will deliver him;
I will set him on high, because he has known My name.
15 He shall call upon Me, and I will answer him;
I will be with him in trouble;
I will deliver him and honor him.
16 With long life I will satisfy him,
And show him My salvation.”

Sources:

Related:

  • Video
    August 8, 2022. SCIENCE & PATENTS OF THE ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE. SGT Report.
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/ImietK5X1ISk/.
    Video.

  • Video
    June 25, 2021. Bluetooth Connect XXX & Walmart Zombie Analysis. LogicBeforeAuthority.
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/UwEL8oqzyV5b/.
    Video.
    The part about the zombie beginning at 2:20 is speculative.  The event likely occurred sometime in early May.  All we know for sure is that this person was experiencing some kind of mental health crisis, and he has a couple of marks on his arm.  We do NOT know for sure what caused this mental health crisis, and we do NOT know whether those marks on the arm are injection sites.  I chose this version of the video because the speculative analysis included with it seemed reasonable.

See also, on this site:

]]> CDC shuts down labs after accidents https://pandemictimeline.com/2014/07/cdc-shuts-down-labs-after-accidents/ Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:00:57 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=3718 Sources: Related:

Read more →

]]> Sources:

Related:

]]> Michael Farrell of Bioterror Rapid Response and Advanced Technology Laboratory steps down https://pandemictimeline.com/2014/07/michael-farrell-of-bioterror-rapid-response-and-advanced-technology-laboratory-steps-down/ Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:00:03 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=3726 Sources:

Read more →

]]> Sources: ]]>