science – Pandemic Timeline https://pandemictimeline.com Chronological Sequence of Events Tue, 15 Oct 2024 05:34:22 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 https://pandemictimeline.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Covid-150x150.ico science – Pandemic Timeline https://pandemictimeline.com 32 32 60GHz frequency found to change nature of oxygen. https://pandemictimeline.com/2001/04/60ghz-frequency-found-to-change-nature-of-oxygen/ Tue, 10 Apr 2001 00:00:15 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=41 Later, some would try to claim that the COVID-19 outbreak was caused by introduction of 5G frequencies and not a virus. Sources:

]]>

Later, some would try to claim that the COVID-19 outbreak was caused by introduction of 5G frequencies and not a virus.

Sources:

  • Research Journal
    April 10, 2001. Shigeaki (Shey) Hakusui. “Fixed Wireless Communications at 60GHz Unique Oxygen Absorption Properties.” RF Globalnet.
    https://www.rfglobalnet.com/doc/fixed-wireless-communications-at-60ghz-unique-0001.
    Research Journal.
  • Research Journal
    May 2005. M.Yu. Tretyakov, M.A. Koshelev, V.V. Dorovskikh, D.S. Makarov, and P.W. Rosenkranz. “60-GHz Oxygen Band: Precise Broadening and Central Frequencies of Fine-Structure Lines, Absolute Absorption Profile at Atmospheric Pressure, and Revision of Mixing Coefficients.Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 231 (1): 1–14.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jms.2004.11.011.
    Research Journal.
]]>
Virology Journal: “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread” https://pandemictimeline.com/2005/08/virology-journal-chloroquine-is-a-potent-inhibitor-of-sars-coronavirus-infection-and-spread/ Mon, 22 Aug 2005 00:00:14 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=51 This article explores chloroquine use for prophylactic prevention of SARS as well as for treatment and prevention of spread. The testing was done with chloroquine (CQ) on cell cultures.  Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a variant of CQ.  COVID-19 is a SARS-like illness. This article is in the NIH database.  Thus we see that a potential treatment…

]]>

This article explores chloroquine use for prophylactic prevention of SARS as well as for treatment and prevention of spread. The testing was done with chloroquine (CQ) on cell cultures.  Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a variant of CQ.  COVID-19 is a SARS-like illness.

This article is in the NIH database.  Thus we see that a potential treatment for COVID-19 was already known at the time SARS-CoV-2 was released.

One of the requirements for issuing an Emergency Use Authorization for a drug is that no other treatment be available.  Not only was the use of CQ and HCQ not explored by the NIH or CDC during the initial phases of the COVID-19 outbreak; but, as we shall see, manipulated and fake research was created to motivate the blocking of its use.  The media echoed these fake results to make them widely known.  “Wrap Up” Smear tactics were used on HCQ.  The prescribing of HCQ for COVID-19 was banned by governors in some states.  Furthermore, during hearings for the vaccine Emergency Use Authorizations, the testimonies of doctors in the field who were successfully using HCQ-based protocols went ignored.  Had the HCQ-based protocols been recognized as a viable treatment option, the Emergency Use Authorizations should never have been issued.

Source:

  • Research Journal
    August 22, 2005. Martin J. Vincent, Eric Bergeron, Suzanne Benjannet, Bobbie R. Erickson, Pierre E. Rollin, Thomas G. Ksiazek, Nabil G. Seidah, and Stuart T. Nichol. “Chloroquine Is a Potent Inhibitor of SARS Coronavirus Infection and Spread.Virology Journal 2 (1): 69.
    https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-2-69.
    Research Journal.

See also, on this site:

]]>
Harvard Magazine: Virus-Sized Transistors https://pandemictimeline.com/2010/12/harvard-magazine-virus-sized-transistors/ Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:18 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=109 Hyman professor of chemistry Charles Lieber has created a transistor so small it can be used to penetrate cell membranes and probe their interiors, without disrupting function. The transistor (yellow) sits near the bend in a hairpin-shaped, lipid-coated silicon nanowire. Its scale is similar to that of intra-cellular structures such as organelles (pink and blue…

]]>

Hyman professor of chemistry Charles Lieber has created a transistor so small it can be used to penetrate cell membranes and probe their interiors, without disrupting function. The transistor (yellow) sits near the bend in a hairpin-shaped, lipid-coated silicon nanowire. Its scale is similar to that of intra-cellular structures such as organelles (pink and blue orbs) and actin filaments (pink strand).

Source:

]]>
Cambrian Genomics founded. https://pandemictimeline.com/2011/06/cambrian-genomics-founded/ Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:01:17 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=112 Austen Heinz of Cambrian Genomics developed a method for laser-printing DNA. The original website had DARPA insignia on it. The company also worked with pharmaceutical companies. Sources: Related: See also, on this site: Austen Heinz files patent 9121825: Methods and apparatuses for MEMs based recovery of sequence verified DNA Austen Heinz found dead of apparent…

]]>

Austen Heinz of Cambrian Genomics developed a method for laser-printing DNA. The original website had DARPA insignia on it. The company also worked with pharmaceutical companies.

Sources:

Related:

  • Research Journal
    April 1, 2010. Sung Hoon Lee, Austen James Heinz, Sunghwan Shin, Yong-Gyun Jung, Sung-Eun Choi, Wook Park, Jung-Hye Roe, and Sunghoon Kwon. “Capillary Based Patterning of Cellular Communities in Laterally Open Channels.Analytical Chemistry 82 (7): 2900–2906.
    https://doi.org/10.1021/ac902903q.
    Research Journal.
  • Research Journal
    December 6, 2010. Sung Hoon Lee, Sung-Eun Choi, Austen James Heinz, Wook Park, Sangkwon Han, Yoonseok Jung, and Sunghoon Kwon. “Active Guidance of 3D Microstructures.Small (Weinheim an Der Bergstrasse, Germany) 6 (23): 2668–72.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201001248.
    Research Journal.
  • Research Journal
    December 30, 2010. Hyoki Kim, Junhoi Kim, Eun-Geun Kim, Austen James Heinz, Sunghoon Kwon, and Honggu Chun. “Optofluidic in Situ Maskless Lithography of Charge Selective Nanoporous Hydrogel for DNA Preconcentration.Biomicrofluidics 4 (4): 43014.
    https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3516037.
    Research Journal.
  • Research Journal
    February 21, 2011. Sung Hoon Lee, Austen James Heinz, Sung-Eun Choi, Wook Park, and Sunghoon Kwon. “Polymer Based Chemical Delivery to Multichannel Capillary Patterned Cells.Lab on a Chip 11 (4): 605–8.
    https://doi.org/10.1039/c0lc00328j.
    Research Journal.

See also, on this site:

]]>
“How We Make DNA” – Cambrian Genomics https://pandemictimeline.com/2013/08/how-we-make-dna-cambrian-genomics/ Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:47 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=120 Their process was 3D printing of DNA, just as one would print any other document or object. This video also shows the sequencing of DNA. In other words, Cambrian Genomics was capable of making DNA from scratch and also reading DNA as if it was a book. Source: Related:

]]>

Their process was 3D printing of DNA, just as one would print any other document or object. This video also shows the sequencing of DNA. In other words, Cambrian Genomics was capable of making DNA from scratch and also reading DNA as if it was a book.

Source:

Related:

]]>
Adverse effects of messenger RNA vaccines https://pandemictimeline.com/2020/12/adverse-effects-of-messenger-rna-vaccines/ Tue, 01 Dec 2020 00:01:15 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=583 December 2020 From the first page: EVIDENCE SUMMARY There are no specific guidelines for use of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines or contraindications to mRNA vaccines. No large trials of any mRNA vaccine have been completed yet.1 The only evidence on safety of mRNA vaccines comes from small phase I and phase II trials of SARS-CoV-2…

]]>
December 2020

From the first page:

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

  • There are no specific guidelines for use of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines or contraindications to mRNA vaccines.
  • No large trials of any mRNA vaccine have been completed yet.1
  • The only evidence on safety of mRNA vaccines comes from small phase I and phase II trials of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, with
    follow-up typically less than two months.
  • Systemic adverse events such as fatigue, muscle aches, headache, and chills are common.
  • Severe systemic adverse events were reported by 5 to 10 percent of trial subjects.2
  • Localized adverse events such as pain at the injection side are common.
  • Both systemic and local adverse events usually are resolved within one or two days.
  • The rate and severity of adverse events appears to be higher for the second dose of vaccine than for the first.
  • Higher vaccine doses appear to increase the rate and severity of adverse events.
  • Larger trials of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are in progress, with results expected in mid-2021.1
  • There is not sufficient evidence to support any conclusions on the comparative safety of different mRNA vaccines.
  • Direct evidence on the comparative safety of mRNA vaccines and other vaccines is lacking.

1. In other words, the January/February 2021 mass rollouts ARE the larger trials. These vaccines were still experimental when they were offered to the public.  As such, they cannot legally be mandated by anyone.  No one can legally force you to take them.  Forcing or coercing anyone into participating in a medical experiment is considered a crime against humanity with a potential punishment of death.
2. This is a very high percentage for severe adverse events.

Source:

See also, on this site:

]]>
Study evaluation finds that WHO HCQ study participants were overdosed. https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/02/study-evaluation-finds-that-who-hcq-study-participants-were-overdosed/ Mon, 15 Feb 2021 00:00:51 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=395 More is not always better.  The normal dose of HCQ is 200 to 400 mg a day.  For purposes of preventing malaria, it may be taken just once a week.  Study participants in a study sponsored by the WHO were given more than 2,000 mg to 4,000 mg of HCQ a day.  That’s up to…

]]>
More is not always better.  The normal dose of HCQ is 200 to 400 mg a day.  For purposes of preventing malaria, it may be taken just once a week.  Study participants in a study sponsored by the WHO were given more than 2,000 mg to 4,000 mg of HCQ a day.  That’s up to ten times the usual dose.

For comparison, Dr. Zelenko uses a normal dose of HCQ in his COVID-19 treatment protocol.

According to David Jayne, professor of clinical autoimmunity at Cambridge University:

“Hydroxychloroquine overdose is associated with cardiovascular, neurological, and other toxicities, occurring with doses over 1500 mg, and higher doses are associated with fatality.”

In an article for the BMJ found here co-head of the Recovery Trial Martin Landray explained:

“The dose comes from modelling by Nick White, professor of tropical medicine at the University of Oxford, and his team, who have extensive experience with this drug.”

Why would a study of a drug be conducted utilizing dosing far exceeding the usual amounts listed on the insert?

Why would they then say that the drug was unsafe when it had been considered safe for several decades?

Was that the purpose in choosing the dosing in the first place?

Why is the word “solidarity” in the study’s title?

Sources:

Similar study conducted in UK:

Related:

  • Research Journal
    May 2017. C. Merino Argumánez, I. Sáez de La Fuente, Z. Molina Collado, D. Suárez Pita, B. Mestre Gómez, and J.A. Sanchez Izquierdo. “Hydroxychloroquine, a Potentially Lethal Drug.Medicina Intensiva (English Edition) 41 (4): 257–59.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2016.05.003.
    Research Journal.
    This article has an alarming title that might worry someone skimming the journal.  But the reader will quickly find out that this article is about someone who took 42 tablets of 200mg hydroxychloroquine while attempting suicide.
  • Research Journal
    July 28, 2020. Xueting Yao, Fei Ye, Miao Zhang, Cheng Cui, Baoying Huang, Peihua Niu, Xu Liu, et al. “In Vitro Antiviral Activity and Projection of Optimized Dosing Design of Hydroxychloroquine for the Treatment of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).Clinical Infectious Diseases 71 (15): 732–39.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa237.
    Research Journal.
  • News Video
    April 22, 2022. Zach Heilman. “Fraudulent Studies And Arson: Bill Gates & Company Did Everything Possible To Kill Early Treatment [VIDEO].” Red Voice Media. Runtime of embedded video: 5:56.
    https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/04/fraudulent-studies-and-arson-bill-gates-company-did-everything-possible-to-kill-early-treatment-video/.
    News, Video.

See also, on this site:

]]>
“Vaccine-Induced Covid-19 Mimicry” Syndrome https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/05/vaccine-induced-covid-19-mimicry-syndrome/ Wed, 26 May 2021 00:00:28 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=596 As of April 2021, four adenovirus vector vaccines for COVID-19 have been authorized in at least one country: The Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine uses the modified chimpanzee adenovirus ChAdOx1 Sputnik V uses human adenovirus serotype 26 for the first shot and serotype 5 for the second. The Johnson & Johnson vaccine uses serotype 26. Convidecia uses serotype 5. Research article excerpt: During the last months many countries have…

]]>
As of April 2021, four adenovirus vector vaccines for COVID-19 have been authorized in at least one country:

Research article excerpt:

During the last months many countries have started the immunization of millions of people by using vector-based vaccines. Unfortunately, severe side effects became overt during these vaccination campaigns: cerebral venous sinus thromboses (CVST), absolutely rare under normal life conditions, were found as a severe side effect that occured 4-14 days after first vaccinations.

The research is saying that these vaccines can cause blood clots 4 to 14 days after vaccination.

Sources:

]]>
Dr. Richard Fleming explains the COVID-19 situation https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/06/dr-richard-fleming-explains-the-covid-19-situation/ Sat, 05 Jun 2021 00:00:49 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=1640 Dr. Richard Fleming presents ‘Event 2021’, a science-based presentation on the COVID-19 pandemic, from the virus, to vaccines, treatments, and the Public Health response.  Virtually everything in this presentation is backed by documentation. If you have time for it, this is probably the best information out there on COVID-19.  Perhaps you can view it in…

]]>

Dr. Richard Fleming presents ‘Event 2021’, a science-based presentation on the COVID-19 pandemic, from the virus, to vaccines, treatments, and the Public Health response.  Virtually everything in this presentation is backed by documentation.

If you have time for it, this is probably the best information out there on COVID-19.  Perhaps you can view it in multiple sessions if time is tight.

Dr. Fleming explains how the virus came to be.  Yes, it was lab-created.  Dr. Fleming shows imaging of the virus.  Scientists know that there is a virus because they can see it with their instruments.  They have sequenced the DNA of the virus and can identify it.  The information shared by Dr. Fleming differs somewhat from that shared by Dr. David Martin.  The main actors in the story are the same, though.

Dr. Fleming explains some early work on finding cures.  It is important to know that generally doctors were told that there were no treatment.  And if doctors tried to use methods of treatment that were not on some official list, they could lose their licenses.  In other words, doctors were prevented under threat from trying methods and drugs that they thought might work.  It is quite possible that many of the people who died could have been saved had doctors been allowed their usual discretion to choose medicines for their patients as they saw fit.

Dr. Fleming talks about choosing medications not for the diseases for which they were approved, but rather for the mechanisms by which they work.  He showed a chart he had made of mechanisms of COVID-19 with a list of drugs and the viral mechanisms they could inhibit.  He and his colleagues had conducted a test of various medications including HCQ.  He explains the protocols of the test.

The presentation includes a video appearance by Dr. Li-Meng Yan, a scientist from Hong Kong who explains what she found when she searched for the origins of SARS-COV-2 and how it appears to be a bioweapon.

Dr. Fleming presents ways we can help with the legal efforts to prevent abuse from the government.

Dr. Fleming presents treatment plans for COVID-19 and spike proteins resulting from jabs.  These are downloadable.

Sources:

Related:

  • Research Journal
    September 14, 2020. Li-Meng Yan, Shu Kang, Jie Guan, and Shanchang Hu. “Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route,
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4028830.
    Research Journal.
    Full report.
    The publication note from 17 July 2021 shown with the abstract is interesting to say the least.
]]>
The Science Suggests a Wuhan Lab Leak https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/06/the-science-suggests-a-wuhan-lab-leak/ Sun, 06 Jun 2021 00:00:11 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=591 Source:

]]>

Illustration for the Wall Street Journal Opinion piece by Quay and Muller

Source:

]]>