James Roguski – Pandemic Timeline https://pandemictimeline.com Chronological Sequence of Events Tue, 07 Mar 2023 08:56:08 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7 https://pandemictimeline.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Covid-150x150.ico James Roguski – Pandemic Timeline https://pandemictimeline.com 32 32 James Roguski sounds the alarm about IHR amendments https://pandemictimeline.com/2022/03/james-roguski-sounds-the-alarm-about-ihr-amendments/ Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:54 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=9909 I am in the process of revising this post, now that the featured event is in the past.  I am dividing out the various events that contributed to it and setting them up in their own posts. There are also a couple updates that I will be writing about. See the links to other posts…

Read more →

]]>

I am in the process of revising this post, now that the featured event is in the past.  I am dividing out the various events that contributed to it and setting them up in their own posts. There are also a couple updates that I will be writing about. See the links to other posts at the end of this post. The link and title for this post has changed, but the old link will continue to work.

In short, on Tuesday, May 22, the WHO wanted to introduce the amendments for vote, but instead changes were submitted. Backroom deals continued after that through the week. On Saturday, May 27, revised changes were presented and accepted. The revised changes did NOT include the same threat to sovereignty that caused the alarm earlier. All of this will be written up in expanded posts dated for the day they happened.

The Pandemic Treaty is a separate event that is still in the future.

Instructions for making your voice heard via email are below.  Calls to action are included in “SOUND THE ALARM.”  Daniel Horowitz tells us that we must call our state governors, lieutenant governors, AGs and tell them to preemptively nullify any WHO international pandemic regulations.  Clay Clark recommends providing the evidence at this link to these state officials.

Beyond the urgent actions mentioned above, states should probably also consider rescinding any legislation based on the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act, now that we know the true motivations for world control behind it.  Furthermore, those places in the world where the tyranny was worst in the last couple of years were those places where the people lacked the means to press against the tyranny.  Even within the United States, this was true.

Joe Biden is in the process of handing over our US sovereignty to the World Health Organization.  That is a fact.  And so, you think about what that means.  That is the equivalent of surrendering America to China.  You say, “What?  How did you get there?”  The World Health Organization, remember, Pres. Trump, he pulled out of the World Health Organization because they were largely controlled by China.  And China is a big fan of World Health Organization, influenced World Health Organization.  So by giving over our sovereignty to the World Health Organization, we have essentially surrendered to China.

So right now, if you were to say, Clay Clark, on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the most urgent, 1 being the least urgent of all time, I would say this moment in American history, this particular show right now, is the most urgent in American history since, perhaps, Pearl Harbor.

— Clay Clark

Given the implications of the proposed amendments, I believe it is accurate to say that this is the most urgent moment in American history since Pearl Harbor.  It is not an exaggeration to say so.  Acceptance of the proposed amendments amounts to a backdoor way to gut the US Constitution entirely as well as negate the sovereignty of all countries.  This is not just a US concern, but a world concern.

Changes proposed by the Biden administration to the United Nations World Health Organization’s International Health Regulations are a massive and very dangerous power grab by the Deep State, warns The New American magazine’s Alex Newman in this episode of Behind The Deep State. If successful, this would allow the WHO to intervene in a nation’s affairs without even the permission of the target nation’s government. At the same time, Deep State globalists behind the UN and the WHO are plotting a new “pandemic treaty” that would grant awesome new powers to the global “health” organization. Think Shanghai, but on a global scale. However, Alex points out that, from a constitutional perspective, all of these Deep State schemes are illegitimate in the United States. And opposition is growing rapidly as more and more leading voices sound the alarm. One answer being pursued by activists is nullification at the state level. Get educated and involved today!

— The New American

Bottom line, it creates a platform for global governance through the WHO. … It’s important now that we get to Kevin McCarthy, the leader of the House, Mitch McConnell, the leader of the Senate, and demand that they drop everything and have a joint press conference and say nothing is going to happen in the United States government until Joe Biden drops these amendments and agrees that we will not give US sovereignty away to the UN. This is the biggest global power grab that we have seen in our lifetimes. If this goes through, nothing else matters.

— Former Rep. Michele Bachmann

The acceptance of proposed amendments to IHR (2005) will result in putting full power into the hands of a single person to declare a pandemic and implement policies with no checks and balances to prevent tyranny.  During the COVID-19 pandemic, the world saw a level of tyranny never before seen.  With the proposed amendments to the IHR in place, whatever we witnessed in other parts of the world such as Australia or Shanghai could happen anywhere, including in the United States.

Policies implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic have been counterproductive and downright criminal.  The people were blocked from seeking remedies that actually worked.  Medical doctors were prevented from using treatments other than those specified by health organizations even though the official treatments were actually murdering people.  Enacting the proposed amendments will increase risk to the world population, not reduce it.

Under the proposed treaty, there is a potential that under-the-skin technologies such as those found in Richard Rothschild’s patents could trigger the use of these tactics against individuals.  It is believed by some that these technologies have already been installed in people via the jabs.  Yuval Noah Harari hinted that this may indeed be the case.  If the injected tracker fails, good luck getting your freedom back.

And all of this will take effect just in time for US elections.

The World Health Organization has already begun drafting a global pandemic treaty on pandemic preparedness. What form will it take? What teeth will it have? How will it further the globalists in cementing the biosecurity grid into place?

— James Corbett

Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger has sounded the alarm.

The United Nations World Health Organization is in the process of usurping ever greater powers over the nations of the world with updates to its international health regime, WHO whistleblower Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger told The New American magazine’s Alex Newman in this episode of Conversations That Matter. Citizens from countries around the world must rise up and make sure this usurpation does not succeed, or freedom and self-government will be lost forever, she warned.

James Roguski has issued a call to action to protest these amendments.

KEY TAKEWAYS:

  • The International Health Regulations (IHR) are legally binding and supercede the United States Constitution. All the nations of the world have already agreed to the existing International Health Regulations.
  • The United States has proposed amendments to the legally binding International Health Regulations that will be voted upon at the next World Health Assembly this May 22, 2022 to May 28, 2022. CLICK HERE FOR OFFICIAL DOCUMENT
  • These proposed amendments will cede additional sovereignty, control and legal authority over to the World Health Organization.
  • These amendments will NOT require approval by 2/3 of the United States Senate. If they are approved (as submitted by the United States) by a simple majority of the 194 member countries of the World Health Assembly countries), these amendments would enter into force as international law just six months later (November 2022). The details of this are not crystal clear. I believe this information to be accurate.
  • It is not known if the amendments will be voted upon individually or as a complete package.
  • The amendments will give the Director General of the WHO the power to unilaterally declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) even over the objection of the country dealing with an outbreak of disease.
  • According to changes made to U.S. regulations that were published one day before Donald Trump was inaugurated (January 19, 2017), the definition of a “Public Health Emergency” in the United States now includes the declaration of a PHEIC by the WHO.
  • A unilateral declaration of a PHEIC by the WHO will enable the declaration of a Public Health Emergency by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.
  • The amendments proposed by the United States would also give the Director General of the WHO the legal authority to unilaterally issue an “intermediate public health alert (IPHA).” The criteria for the issuance of an IPHA is simply that “the Director-General has determined it requires heightened international awareness and a potential international public health response.”
  • The amendments will also give “regional directors” within the WHO the legal authority to declare a Public Health Emergency of Regional Concern (PHERC).
  • Yes people, the United States wants to hand over our sovereignty to Regional Directors at the WHO and give them the power to “PHERC” us and “PHERC” the world, one region at a time. “PHERC” that!

— James Roguski

Everyone has the opportunity to voice their opinion regarding the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.

Send your comments to the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Global Affairs (OGA).

The Stakeholder Listening Session will help the HHS Office of Global Affairs prepare the U.S. delegation to the World Health Assembly by taking full advantage of the knowledge, ideas, feedback, and suggestions from all communities interested in and affected by agenda items to be discussed at the 75th World Health Assembly.

The U.S. Government will consider contributions received from the stakeholders as it develops the U.S. positions.

Written comments are welcome and encouraged.

Please send written comments to the email address: OGA.RSVP@hhs.gov

We look forward to hearing your comments related to the 75th World Health Assembly agenda items.

Please save a copy of the email that you send to the HHS’ Office of Global Affairs and post it into the comment section below this article.

— James Roguski

In my opinion, any delegate who votes for these amendments is committing an act of treason against their country and all nations of the world, given that a vote for these amendments cedes their country’s sovereignty and the sovereignty of all countries.  Those who proposed these amendments have broken their oaths to protect the US constitution.

Apparently, Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano agrees.  He did not mince words.

Meanwhile, various legal cases are being pursued around the world, both civil and criminal.  Defendants include Bill Gates and the chief scientist of the WHO.  Courts are already ruling against mandates and restrictions.  Reports are coming in that COVID mandates and restrictions created great harm.  Furthermore, evidence exists that the whole pandemic may have been planned by regulators including the WHO and those associated with them for purposes unrelated to health.  The people of the WHO have not earned our trust; rather, they have violated it.  Why would we trust the WHO now with the added authority that the IHR amendments would give them?

Thank God that He directed James Roguski to find notice of these amendments and alert the world.

Surely, there is enough evidence now to arrest them instead?

Meanwhile, just in time to prevent arrivals in Geneva for meetings of the WHO and WEF, a nearby fire shut down the Geneva airport.

Sources:

Related:

See also, on this site:

]]> FDA holds meetings regarding vaccines for 6-month-olds https://pandemictimeline.com/2022/06/fda-holds-meetings-regarding-vaccines-for-6-month-olds/ Tue, 14 Jun 2022 00:00:36 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=10560 Do NOT jab your children! Those who jab their children are participating in a conspiracy against them the likes of which this world has not seen in recorded history.  These jabs are NOT vaccines in the normal sense.  These jabs contain gene modifying technology that can change your child’s DNA.  In addition, these jabs appear…

Read more →

]]>

Do NOT jab your children!

Those who jab their children are participating in a conspiracy against them the likes of which this world has not seen in recorded history.  These jabs are NOT vaccines in the normal sense.  These jabs contain gene modifying technology that can change your child’s DNA.  In addition, these jabs appear to contain nanotechnology intended to connect your children to the internet for tracking.  This can enslave them.  Furthermore, these jabs appear to have the capability of causing spiritual changes.  Jabbing your children could forever impair their intuition.  The overall death rate among children has greatly increased since they began jabbing them.

What you do to yourselves of your own free will is one thing; what you do to others, including your children, without their informed knowledge and consent is quite another matter.  Young children are not capable of giving informed consent, especially in a matter such as this.  It is the duty of parents and caregivers to protect them from harms.

COVID-19 does virtually no harm to children.  There is no need to jab them at all.

Luke 17:1-2 (NKJV)

1  Then He said to the disciples, “It is impossible that no offenses should come, but woe to him through whom they do come!
2  It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were thrown into the sea, than that he should offendG4624 * one of these little ones.”

* See below for Strong’s analysis.

Those who have seen this warning cannot claim innocence before God.  You have been warned!

Those who find this warning after you have jabbed your kids, PRAY!  More on this below.

WE MUST MAKE EVERYONE AWARE OF THIS BEFORE PARENTS ALLOW THEIR CHILDREN TO BE INJECTED!!

  1. The most fundamental and required information needed to determine whether or not to approve a “vaccine” has NOT been provided by either Pfizer or Moderna.
  2. The Pfizer injections do NOT prevent death due to COVID-19.
  3. The first Pfizer injection actually increases the likelihood that babies will get COVID-19 by 29.7%.
  4. A full course of three Pfizer injections based on a manipulated Wuhan strain of SARS-CoV-2 have been shown to be only 14.5% effective in preventing COVID-19 in children 6-23 months old.
  5. Every child who received the placebo in the trials has survived. No babies in the placebo group died due to COVID-19. The study actually demonstrated that COVID-19 does NOT pose a risk of death to babies.
  6. Over 75% of children in the United States have been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 and have developed natural immunity. They do not need a “vaccine.”
  7. There is no emergency among young children and infants.
  8. There IS serious danger in these injections.

— James Roguski

Slide shown at 3:39:10 during the meeting

Note that the number of BNT162b2 test subjects reduce from 1027 to 277 over the course of the testing.  The number of Placebo test subjects reduce from 524 down to 139.

Why were so many participants withdrawn from the study? Where are the participants now?  How is their health?  Did they suffer adverse events that kept them from continuing with the study?

The FDA officials who might have wanted to stop the vaccine rollouts have already resigned, and we are left with those willing to keep pursuing the failed narrative in spite of the evidence of harm.

More on the warning above:

The following analyzes the source for the word “offend” as shown in Luke 17:1-2.  Note that the typical understanding of the verse is about hindering right conduct and causing the children to stumble into sin.  In the case of the jabs, its most literal connotation of entrapment is quite fitting as well.

G4624

σκανδαλίζω

skandalizō

skan-dal-id’-zo

To “scandalize”; from G4625; to entrap, that is, trip up (figuratively stumble [transitively] or entice to sin, apostasy or displeasure): – (make to) offend.

Total KJV occurrences: 30

skandalízō – properly, set a snare (“stumbling-block“); (figuratively) “to hinder right conduct or thought; to cause to stumble” – literally, “to fall into a trap” (Abbott-Smith). See 4625 (skandalon).

G4625

σκάνδαλον

skandalon

skan’-dal-on

A “scandal”; probably from a derivative of G2578; a trap stick (bent sapling), that is, snare (figuratively cause of displeasure or sin): – occasion to fall (of stumbling), offence, thing that offends, stumbling-block.

Total KJV occurrences: 15

skándalon – properly, the trigger of a trap (the mechanism closing a trap down on the unsuspecting victim); (figuratively) an offense, putting a negative cause-and-effect relationship into motion.

G2578

κάμπτω

kamptō

kamp’-to

Apparently a primary verb; to bend: – bow.

Total KJV occurrences: 4

Those who find this warning after you have jabbed your kids, PRAY!  At least one prophet has said that God can change DNA.  Some of the treatments mentioned on this site may mitigate some of the adverse effects of the jabs, but only God can repair the damage.

Matthew 19:26 (NKJV)

But Jesus looked at them and said to them, “With men this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”

Mark 9:23 (NKJV)

Jesus said to him, “If you can believe, all things are possible to him who believes.”

1 John 5:14-15 (NKJV)

14  Now this is the confidence that we have in Him, that if we ask anything according to His will, He hears us.
15  And if we know that He hears us, whatever we ask, we know that we have the petitions that we have asked of Him.

James 4:2-3 (NKJV)

2  … Yet you do not have because you do not ask.
3  You ask and do not receive, because you ask amiss, that you may spend it on your pleasures.

Sources:

Related:

See also, on this site:

]]> The WHO meets face to face in Switzerland https://pandemictimeline.com/2022/10/the-who-meets-face-to-face-in-switzerland/ Mon, 24 Oct 2022 00:00:14 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=11404 The meetings are taking place October 24 – October 28. One of the topics will be the amendments to the International Health Regulations. Please see the post on this site, James Roguski sounds the alarm about IHR amendments, for the legal implications of what could result from the passing of these amendments. Sources: See also,…

Read more →

]]> The meetings are taking place October 24 – October 28.

One of the topics will be the amendments to the International Health Regulations.

Please see the post on this site, James Roguski sounds the alarm about IHR amendments, for the legal implications of what could result from the passing of these amendments.

Sources:

See also, on this site:

]]> WHO proposes to remove rights statement from governing documents https://pandemictimeline.com/2022/12/who-proposes-to-remove-rights-statement-from-governing-documents/ Fri, 16 Dec 2022 00:00:58 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=11699 These proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) seek to remove respect for your dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms. NOW is the time to take action to stop this. ⋮ The proposed changes to the first principle in Article 3 of the International Health Regulations pretty much says it all. If adopted, they…

Read more →

]]>

These proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) seek to remove respect for your dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms. NOW is the time to take action to stop this.

⋮

The proposed changes to the first principle in Article 3 of the International Health Regulations pretty much says it all. If adopted, they would strike out the following text:

“with the full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons”

— James Roguski

Proposed change to the International Health Regulation, as presented by James Roguski

James Roguski has put together a list of 14 calls to action.  The following is an outline of those calls to action.  Please see James Roguski’s article for more detailed information.

ACTION 1: Scroll further down in [James Roguski’s] article and read the proposed amendments to the IHR. Feel free to comment and I encourage you to record your opinions on video and post the links in the comment section.

ACTION 2: Share this website [StopTheAmendments.com] and flyer far and wide. Especially, share this information with members of the alternative media.

ACTION 3: Share this information on Twitter and other social media sites.

ACTION 4: Email and Call Every Member of the United States Congress to tell Congress to investigate these secret negotiations with the World Health Organization.

ACTION 5: Email and Call Every Member of the United States Congress to tell Congress to exit the WHO.

ACTION 6: Email your Congressional Representative and Senators [to stop the IHR amendments].

ACTION 7: Email and Call Your United States Congressional Representative and Senators AT THEIR LOCAL OFFICES.  [See article for sample email.]

ACTION 8: Contact Colin McIff.  [See article for more details.]

ACTION 9: Contact Lawrence Oglethorpe Gostin.  [See article for more details.]

ACTION 10: Sign the Petition to Stop the IHR Amendments.

ACTION 11: Sign the Petition to Stop the Treaty.

ACTION 12: Sign the Petition to Exit The WHO (United States).

ACTION 13: Sign the Petition to Exit The WHO (Global).

ACTION 14: Contact Members of Parliament and Other Government Officials (CANADA).

— James Roguski

Much more information on this topic can be found in a previous post about the IHR amendments: James Roguski sounds the alarm about IHR amendments

Sources:

Related:

See also, on this site:

]]>