bioengineering – Pandemic Timeline https://pandemictimeline.com Chronological Sequence of Events Wed, 08 Jan 2025 06:53:35 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 https://pandemictimeline.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Covid-150x150.ico bioengineering – Pandemic Timeline https://pandemictimeline.com 32 32 United States Supreme Court decides DIAMOND vs. CHAKRABARTY https://pandemictimeline.com/1980/06/united-states-supreme-court-decides-diamond-vs-chakrabarty/ Mon, 16 Jun 1980 00:00:53 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=18 This Supreme Court decision allows for the patenting of living organisms, which had been forbidden prior to this decision. From the filing: In 1972, respondent [Ananda M.] Chakrabarty, a microbiologist, filed a patent application, assigned to the General Electric Co.  The application asserted 36 claims related to Chakrabarty’s invention of “a bacterium from the genus…

]]>

This Supreme Court decision allows for the patenting of living organisms, which had been forbidden prior to this decision.

From the filing:

In 1972, respondent [Ananda M.] Chakrabarty, a microbiologist, filed a patent application, assigned to the General Electric Co.  The application asserted 36 claims related to Chakrabarty’s invention of “a bacterium from the genus Pseudomonas containing therein at least two stable energy-generating plasmids, each of said plasmids providing a separate hydrocarbon degradative pathway.”  This human-made, genetically engineered bacterium is capable of breaking down multiple components of crude oil.  Because of this property, which is possessed by no naturally occurring bacteria, Chakrabarty’s invention is believed to have significant value for the treatment of oil spills.

The mRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” have been found to alter DNA.  mRNA “vaccines” are now being used in livestock.  As the alteration of the DNA of livestock is changed by mRNA “vaccines,” DIAMOND vs. CHAKRABARTY opens the door for the “creators” of the modified livestock to claim ownership of their DNA, just as the medical industry does now with humans.  I have personally seen a document claiming ownership of the DNA of a person who had undergone a trial of a gene therapy medication, so I know this to be a fact and not mere conspiracy.  Original FDA documentation of the mRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” classified them as gene therapies.  SEC filings of the companies that manufacture the “vaccines” characterized their mRNA products as gene therapies, including the “vaccines.”  As the “creators” of the DNA claim ownership of the DNA of livestock, this could become a mechanism for the control of the food supply.  This is not a trivial matter.

Source:

See also, on this site:

]]>
UNC Chapel Hill files patent US7279327: Methods for producing recombinant coronavirus https://pandemictimeline.com/2002/04/unc-chapel-hill-files-patent-7279327-methods-for-producing-recombinant-coronavirus/ Fri, 19 Apr 2002 00:00:25 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=1910 A helper cell for producing an infectious, replication defective, coronavirus (or more generally nidovirus) particle cell comprises (a) a nidovirus permissive cell; (b) a nidovirus replicon RNA comprising the nidovirus packaging signal and a heterologous RNA sequence, wherein the replicon RNA further lacks a sequence encoding at least one nidovirus structural protein; and (c) at…

]]>

A helper cell for producing an infectious, replication defective, coronavirus (or more generally nidovirus) particle cell comprises (a) a nidovirus permissive cell; (b) a nidovirus replicon RNA comprising the nidovirus packaging signal and a heterologous RNA sequence, wherein the replicon RNA further lacks a sequence encoding at least one nidovirus structural protein; and (c) at least one separate helper RNA encoding the at least one structural protein absent from the replicon RNA, the helper RNA(s) lacking the nidovirus packaging signal. The combined expression of the replicon RNA and the helper RNA in the nidovirus permissive cell produces an assembled nidovirus particle which comprises the heterologous RNA sequence, is able to infect a cell, and is unable to complete viral replication in the absence of the helper RNA due to the absence of the structural protein coding sequence in the packaged replicon. Compositions for use in making such helper cells, along with viral particles produced from such cells, compositions of such viral particles, and methods of making and using such viral particles, are also disclosed.

Patent US7279327B2

From the Reiner/Martin interview:

… in 1999 Anthony Fauci funded research at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, specifically to create, and you cannot help but, you know, lament what I’m about to read because this comes directly from a patent application filed on April 19 2002. And you heard the date correctly 2002 where the NIAID built an infectious replication defective Coronavirus that was specifically targeted for human lung epithelium. In other words, we made SARS and we patented it on April 19 2002, before there was ever any alleged outbreak in Asia, which as you know, followed that by several months. That patent issued is US Patent 7279327. That patent clearly lays out in very specific gene sequencing, the fact that we knew that the ACE receptor, the ACE2 binding domain, the s1 spike protein, and other elements of what we have come to know as this scourge pathogen was not only engineered, but could be synthetically modified in the laboratory, using nothing more than gene sequencing technologies, taking computer code and turning it into a pathogen or an intermediate of the pathogen. And that technology was funded exclusively in the early days as a means by which we could actually harness Coronavirus as a vector to distribute HIV vaccine.

Dr. David Martin at 02:53

To see how DNA is generated directly from a computer, see “How We Make DNA” – Cambrian Genomics.

Sources:

See also, on this site:

 

 

 

 

]]>
Sequoia Pharmaceuticals files patent US7151163: Antiviral agents for the treatment, control and prevention of infections by coronaviruses https://pandemictimeline.com/2004/04/sequoia-pharmaceuticals-files-patent-7151163-antiviral-agents-for-the-treatment-control-and-prevention-of-infections-by-coronaviruses/ Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:00:20 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=1422 The invention provides compositions and methods that are useful for preventing and treating a coronavirus infection in a subject. More specifically, the invention provides peptides and conjugates and pharmaceutical compositions containing those peptides and conjugates that block fusion of a coronavirus, such as the SARS virus, to a target cell. This blocking mechanism prevents or…

]]>

The invention provides compositions and methods that are useful for preventing and treating a coronavirus infection in a subject. More specifically, the invention provides peptides and conjugates and pharmaceutical compositions containing those peptides and conjugates that block fusion of a coronavirus, such as the SARS virus, to a target cell. This blocking mechanism prevents or treats a coronavirus infection, such as a SARS infection, in a subject, such as a human subject.

— Patent US7151163B2

From the Reiner/Martin interview:

Dr David Martin  25:57

The patent in question, the April 28th 2003 patent 7151163, issued to Sequoia Pharmaceuticals has another problem. The problem is it was issued and published before the CDC patent on Coronavirus was actually allowed. So the degree to which the information could have been known by any means other than insider information between those parties is zero. It is not physically possible for you to patent a thing that treats a thing that had not been published, because CDC had paid to keep it secret. This, my friends is the definition of criminal conspiracy racketeering and collusion. This is not a theory. This is evidence. You cannot have information in the future in form [for] a treatment for a thing that did not exist.

Reiner Fuellmich  27:16

This could well blow up into a Rico case, ultimately.

Dr David Martin  27:20

This is, it is a Rico case. It’s not could blow up into it, it is a Rico case. And the Rico pattern, which was established in April of 2003 for the first Coronavirus, was played out to exactly the same schedule when we see SARS CoV 2 show up when we have Moderna getting the spike protein sequence by phone from the vaccine research centre at NIAID prior to the definition of the novel subclade. How do you treat a thing before you actually have the thing?

Reiner Fuellmich Interviews Dr David Martin

Sources:

Related:

See also, on this site:

 

 

 

]]>
Ablynx files patent US9193780: Amino acid sequences directed against envelope proteins of a virus and polypeptides comprising the same for the treatment of viral diseases https://pandemictimeline.com/2009/06/ablynx-files-patent-9193780-amino-acid-sequences-directed-against-envelope-proteins-of-a-virus-and-polypeptides-comprising-the-same-for-the-treatment-of-viral-diseases/ Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:00:35 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=1424 The present invention relates in part to amino acid sequences that are directed against and/or that can specifically bind to an envelope protein of a virus, as well as to compounds or constructs, and in particular proteins and polypeptides, that comprise or essentially consist of one or more such amino acid sequences. — Patent US9193780B2…

]]>

The present invention relates in part to amino acid sequences that are directed against and/or that can specifically bind to an envelope protein of a virus, as well as to compounds or constructs, and in particular proteins and polypeptides, that comprise or essentially consist of one or more such amino acid sequences.

Patent US9193780B2

From the Reiner/Martin interview:

Dr David Martin  33:24

Oh it does. The 5th of June 2008, which is an important date because it is actually around the time when DARPA the Defence Advanced Research Programme in the United States actively took an interest in Coronavirus as a biological weapon. June 5 2008 Ablynx, which as you know is now part of Sanofi, filed a series of patents that specifically targeted what we’ve been told is the novel feature of the SARS CoV 2 virus. And you heard what I just said, this is the 5th of June 2008.

Reiner Fuellmich  34:09

They found what?

Dr David Martin  34:10

Specifically they targeted what was called the poly basic cleavage site for SARS Cov, the novel spike protein and the ACE2 receptor binding domain which is allegedly novel to SARS CoV 2, and all of that was patented on the 5th of June 2008. And those patents in sequence were issued between November 24th of 2015, which was US Patent 9193780. So that one came out after the gain of function moratorium.

Sources:

See also, on this site:

 

 

]]>
Charges filed against WHO, UN, others. https://pandemictimeline.com/2009/06/charges-filed-against-who-un-others/ Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:45 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=85 Journalist Jane Bürgermeister files charges with the FBI against the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations (UN), and several of the highest-ranking government and corporate officials concerning bioterrorism and attempts to commit mass murder.  She has also prepared an injunction against forced vaccination which is being filed in America. These actions follow her charges…

]]>

Journalist Jane Bürgermeister files charges with the FBI against the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations (UN), and several of the highest-ranking government and corporate officials concerning bioterrorism and attempts to commit mass murder.  She has also prepared an injunction against forced vaccination which is being filed in America. These actions follow her charges filed in April against Baxter AG and Avir Green Hills Biotechnology of Austria for producing contaminated bird flu vaccine, alleging this was a deliberate act to cause and profit from a pandemic.

She had previously filed charges on April 8, 2009, with the Vienna City Courthouse where she lives against Baxter AG and Avir Green Hills Biotechnology of Austria.  See her post of April 13, 2009, Charges filed with the 1st part translated into English (archived).

Source:

]]>
Harvard Magazine: Virus-Sized Transistors https://pandemictimeline.com/2010/12/harvard-magazine-virus-sized-transistors/ Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:18 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=109 Hyman professor of chemistry Charles Lieber has created a transistor so small it can be used to penetrate cell membranes and probe their interiors, without disrupting function. The transistor (yellow) sits near the bend in a hairpin-shaped, lipid-coated silicon nanowire. Its scale is similar to that of intra-cellular structures such as organelles (pink and blue…

]]>

Hyman professor of chemistry Charles Lieber has created a transistor so small it can be used to penetrate cell membranes and probe their interiors, without disrupting function. The transistor (yellow) sits near the bend in a hairpin-shaped, lipid-coated silicon nanowire. Its scale is similar to that of intra-cellular structures such as organelles (pink and blue orbs) and actin filaments (pink strand).

Source:

]]>
Cambrian Genomics founded. https://pandemictimeline.com/2011/06/cambrian-genomics-founded/ Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:01:17 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=112 Austen Heinz of Cambrian Genomics developed a method for laser-printing DNA. The original website had DARPA insignia on it. The company also worked with pharmaceutical companies. Sources: Related: See also, on this site: Austen Heinz files patent 9121825: Methods and apparatuses for MEMs based recovery of sequence verified DNA Austen Heinz found dead of apparent…

]]>

Austen Heinz of Cambrian Genomics developed a method for laser-printing DNA. The original website had DARPA insignia on it. The company also worked with pharmaceutical companies.

Sources:

Related:

  • Research Journal
    April 1, 2010. Sung Hoon Lee, Austen James Heinz, Sunghwan Shin, Yong-Gyun Jung, Sung-Eun Choi, Wook Park, Jung-Hye Roe, and Sunghoon Kwon. “Capillary Based Patterning of Cellular Communities in Laterally Open Channels.Analytical Chemistry 82 (7): 2900–2906.
    https://doi.org/10.1021/ac902903q.
    Research Journal.
  • Research Journal
    December 6, 2010. Sung Hoon Lee, Sung-Eun Choi, Austen James Heinz, Wook Park, Sangkwon Han, Yoonseok Jung, and Sunghoon Kwon. “Active Guidance of 3D Microstructures.Small (Weinheim an Der Bergstrasse, Germany) 6 (23): 2668–72.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201001248.
    Research Journal.
  • Research Journal
    December 30, 2010. Hyoki Kim, Junhoi Kim, Eun-Geun Kim, Austen James Heinz, Sunghoon Kwon, and Honggu Chun. “Optofluidic in Situ Maskless Lithography of Charge Selective Nanoporous Hydrogel for DNA Preconcentration.Biomicrofluidics 4 (4): 43014.
    https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3516037.
    Research Journal.
  • Research Journal
    February 21, 2011. Sung Hoon Lee, Austen James Heinz, Sung-Eun Choi, Wook Park, and Sunghoon Kwon. “Polymer Based Chemical Delivery to Multichannel Capillary Patterned Cells.Lab on a Chip 11 (4): 605–8.
    https://doi.org/10.1039/c0lc00328j.
    Research Journal.

See also, on this site:

]]>
Promotion of the FunVax “documentary” begins https://pandemictimeline.com/2012/11/promotion-of-the-funvax-documentary-begins/ Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:51 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=48 I put this item in the timeline because so many fell for it.  I keep it in the timeline because I found the real clue that everyone else missed or ignored.  There are some important links in the “Related” section below. Sometimes, the fact checkers actually get it right, at least at the surface level. …

]]>

I put this item in the timeline because so many fell for it.  I keep it in the timeline because I found the real clue that everyone else missed or ignored.  There are some important links in the “Related” section below.

Sometimes, the fact checkers actually get it right, at least at the surface level.  The video shows what appears to be a briefing at the Pentagon regarding the use of vaccines to remove a tendency toward religious fundamentalism.  But is this what is really going on?

On May 16, 2021, the San Francisco Chronicle posted an “opinion” from film producer Ryan Harper in which he claims responsibility for creating the FunVax hoax.  Apparently, the clip was part of a promotion for a film he had planned to make in which he would say at the end that it was all a hoax.  This clip is in the trailer for that film.  The film was supposed to be something similar in style to Borat, perhaps.

Ryan Harper is listed on IMDb, though apparently this film did not make it far enough into production to get an entry there under Ryan Harper’s name.  The film never was made, and the true nature of the video was never made clear until the opinion was published.

The facts in the apology hold up.  Links show up in archives in the appropriate years.

As for the conspiracy theorists, I believe they were correct in sensing that there was a problem, but they got distracted by the video and missed the true source of the problem.  Read on and be sure to check out the “Related” links section below.

In 2011, I created a story called FunVax.

To be more accurate, it was a collaboration between me and a successful Silicon Valley entrepreneur. And rather than a simple story, it was an idea for a mockumentary.

In 2004, a scientist named Dean Hamer discovered a gene that predisposes people to become more religious. Hamer called his discovery the “God Gene.” The scientific name for the God Gene is VMAT2. You know those little molecules in your brain that make you happy? Dopamine and serotonin? Well, VMAT2 is responsible for packaging those little molecules and delivering them to synapses in your brain.

This real-life discovery was the basis for my film.

The premise of my story was that if a gene can control one’s religiosity, then that gene can be manipulated and turned on and off at will. In the film, the government uses this idea to create a vaccine to “cure” religious fundamentalism, which would help gain an edge in Iraq and Afghanistan. No Islamic extremists, no jihad, no war.

As part of the filmmaking process, I released a fictional video on YouTube showing a scientist pitching the FunVax proposal to a small audience at the Pentagon. In the film itself, I then dissected this YouTube video and proved that it had been doctored. At movie’s end, the lead character, Joey Lambardi, admits to making up the FunVax conspiracy.

Unfortunately, nobody ever saw the film’s conclusion, because it was never released.

Ryan Harper

That person making the presentation is not Bill Gates, as some have said.  He is one of Ryan Harper’s friends.

That said, whether or not FunVax was a hoax, the film concept may have been some kind of predictive programming.  Evidence exists that the COVID-19 vaccines may indeed attack the “God gene.”  Meanwhile, Dean Hamer has been doing a lot of research into the genetics of behavior, and he was interviewed in one of the FunVax promotional videos. He was an independent researcher at the National Institutes of Health for 35 years, where he was the Chief of Gene Structure and Regulation Section at the U.S. National Cancer Institute; upon retirement in 2011 he was designated Scientist Emeritus.  In other words, there is an NIH connection to the story.  Please see the “Related” links section below.

Is the Pentagon angle presented in the trailer clip actually a red herring to keep conspiracy theorists away from the real research that was ongoing at the NIH?

Are humans in control of predictive programming?  Or does some other force inspire it?

Seriously, folks, the real meat of this blog is in the links sections below any commentary I may choose to include at the top of the posts. My purpose in putting together this blog was to help you find what you need to know about COVID-related events. The main reason that there is commentary type content at the top of the posts is because I had feedback from people that they did not know how to use the site. Blog titles are for the most part purposefully low-key to make the posts more shareable in a Cancel Culture world.  The downside of this strategy is that the importance of the material may not be immediately apparent.

With this particular post especially, it is not the hoax itself that is important, other than to know that the video does not show a real event; rather, the important part of this post is the research into the God Gene that inspired it, which you can find in the “Related” section of this particular post, especially toward the end where you will find links to posts on the topic of the Barcode of Life.

If you choose to discuss the video that is the topic of this post, please take care in how you characterize it.  As you can see from the links in the “Sources” section below, the true nature of the video as a hoax is clearly and thoroughly documented.

Sources:

Related:

See also, on this site:

]]>
Austen Heinz files patent US9121825: Methods and apparatuses for MEMs based recovery of sequence verified DNA https://pandemictimeline.com/2012/12/austen-heinz-files-patent-9121825-methods-and-apparatuses-for-mems-based-recovery-of-sequence-verified-dna/ Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:00:56 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=9335 A method of retrieving sequence-verified deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) includes positioning a sequence-verified DNA molecule on a microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) substrate. The MEMS substrate includes an electrostatic actuator and the sequence-verified DNA molecule is positioned adjacent to a moving element. The method also includes applying a voltage between the moving element and a stator to cause…

]]>

A method of retrieving sequence-verified deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) includes positioning a sequence-verified DNA molecule on a microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) substrate. The MEMS substrate includes an electrostatic actuator and the sequence-verified DNA molecule is positioned adjacent to a moving element. The method also includes applying a voltage between the moving element and a stator to cause a motion of the moving element, thereby ejecting the sequence-verified DNA molecule from the MEMS substrate.

Patent US9121825B2

This invention has been likened to a laser printer for DNA.

When I did a search for 20140008223 on the USPTO site, three other documents came up as well, all filed by Charles L. Buchanan.  It does not appear that these patents have been issued yet.

Sources:

Related:

See also, on this site:

 

 

]]>
“How We Make DNA” – Cambrian Genomics https://pandemictimeline.com/2013/08/how-we-make-dna-cambrian-genomics/ Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:47 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=120 Their process was 3D printing of DNA, just as one would print any other document or object. This video also shows the sequencing of DNA. In other words, Cambrian Genomics was capable of making DNA from scratch and also reading DNA as if it was a book. Source: Related:

]]>

Their process was 3D printing of DNA, just as one would print any other document or object. This video also shows the sequencing of DNA. In other words, Cambrian Genomics was capable of making DNA from scratch and also reading DNA as if it was a book.

Source:

Related:

]]>