Australia – Pandemic Timeline https://pandemictimeline.com Chronological Sequence of Events Thu, 29 Feb 2024 04:10:21 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 https://pandemictimeline.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Covid-150x150.ico Australia – Pandemic Timeline https://pandemictimeline.com 32 32 Australia: COVID-positive and close contacts get hauled off to concentration camps https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/11/australia-covid-positive-and-close-contacts-get-hauled-off-to-concentration-camps/ Sun, 21 Nov 2021 00:00:35 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=7565 It is not just those who are actually sick that are getting hauled off.  It is their close contacts as well.  Think “contact tracing.” Considering that there are simple treatments available for COVID, this is criminal.  It is criminal that these treatments are being blocked in many places.  And, the so-called “vaccines” are actually worsening…

Read more →

]]> It is not just those who are actually sick that are getting hauled off.  It is their close contacts as well.  Think “contact tracing.”

Considering that there are simple treatments available for COVID, this is criminal.  It is criminal that these treatments are being blocked in many places.  And, the so-called “vaccines” are actually worsening the situation.  Insisting on the “vaccines” at this point could be considered criminal as well.

Source:

See also, on this site:

]]> Dr. Vanden Bossche, Dr. Malone, and Dr. Zelenko meet with Australian politicians https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/12/dr-vanden-bossche-dr-malone-and-dr-zelenko-meet-with-australian-politicians/ Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:00:03 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=8338 Sources:

Read more →

]]>

Sources:

]]> AMPS sends a letter (Australia) https://pandemictimeline.com/2023/01/amps-sends-a-letter-australia/ Wed, 11 Jan 2023 00:00:56 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=12982 ON 11 JANUARY 2023, AMPS WROTE TO MEMBERS PROVIDING IMPORTANT INFORMATION: ADMINISTERING OF COVID-19 VACCINATION IS LIKELY NOT AN INDEMNIFIED ACTION The letter alerted doctors and nurses who may administer the Covid-19 vaccines that recent correspondence from government advisers outlined that a medical indemnity scheme for health professionals administering the COVID-19 vaccines was never established…

Read more →

]]>

ON 11 JANUARY 2023, AMPS WROTE TO MEMBERS PROVIDING IMPORTANT INFORMATION: ADMINISTERING OF COVID-19 VACCINATION IS LIKELY NOT AN INDEMNIFIED ACTION

The letter alerted doctors and nurses who may administer the Covid-19 vaccines that recent correspondence from government advisers outlined that a medical indemnity scheme for health professionals administering the COVID-19 vaccines was never established per se.

— AMPS

Unlike the case with manufacturers of COVID-19 vaccines, there appears to be no government liability protection beyond the vaccine injury ‘COVID-19 vaccine claims scheme’.

— AMPS letter

For consent to be legally valid…It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation…It can only be given after the potential risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine, the risks of not having it, and any alternative options have been explained to the person.

— The Australian Immunisation Handbook

The following video screen capture shows what the FDA knew on October 22, 2020. If your informed consent did not include this information, it was incomplete.

This list of possible adverse event outcomes appears in the video very briefly at 2:33:40.

Alternative options were available, but information about them was systematically being suppressed, disparaged, blocked, and denied by health departments and mainstream media to protect the legality of the Emergency Use Authorizations.  The EUAs could not have been issued had alternatives been known.

Under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), when the Secretary of HHS declares that an emergency use authorization is appropriate, FDA may authorize unapproved medical products or unapproved uses of approved medical products to be used in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions caused by CBRN threat agents when certain criteria are met, including there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.

— FDA statement on EAUs

In other words, if there is a viable option, an EAU should not be granted.

It might be that those who blocked information about alternative options could be held liable as well.

Might these concerns about indemnity apply in the United States as well?

Sources:

See also, on this site:

]]> South Australia Employment Tribunal holds employer accountable https://pandemictimeline.com/2024/01/south-australia-employment-tribunal-holds-employer-accountable/ Mon, 15 Jan 2024 00:00:02 +0000 https://pandemictimeline.com/?p=16007 The Department of Child Protection (DCP) must pay compensation and medical expenses to a youth worker who developed pericarditis after getting a Covid booster under a workplace vaccination directive, the South Australian Employment Tribunal has ruled. — Rebekah Barnett Daniel Shepherd, who developed pericarditis after his employer required him to take Pfizer’s COVID-19 booster, took…

Read more →

]]>

The Department of Child Protection (DCP) must pay compensation and medical expenses to a youth worker who developed pericarditis after getting a Covid booster under a workplace vaccination directive, the South Australian Employment Tribunal has ruled.

— Rebekah Barnett

Daniel Shepherd, who developed pericarditis after his employer required him to take Pfizer’s COVID-19 booster, took his case to an employment tribunal, which ordered Shepherd’s employer to pay worker’s compensation benefits and reimburse him for medical expenses.

— John-Michael Dumais

The South Australian Employment Tribunal has found that employers who mandated their staff to take the COVID-19 vaccines can be held liable for injuries caused. The ruling implies that employers will no longer be able to claim that they are protected from compensation because they were complying with a lawful state government directive.

— LifeSite

It would be astonishing if parliament intended that an employee of the state, injured adhering to an EM (Emergency Management) Act direction, was to be precluded from receiving workers compensation.

⋮

I am not satisfied that parliament intended to deny compensation to employees of the state injured by heeding a vaccination mandate designed to protect the health and welfare of citizens.

— Judge Mark Calligeros, via John-Michael Dumais

“The most significant aspect of this case, in my opinion, is that even though there was a Public Health Order in place, the Tribunal found the employer responsible anyway,” says Fam.

— Peter Fam, as quoted by Rebekah Barnett

‘Because They Told Me To’ Doesn’t Cut It

— Dr. Byram Bridle

Sources:

Related:

See also, on this site:

]]>