Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center thought it had an outbreak of whooping cough. Nearly 1,000 staff members were given a PCR test. 142 of them came back positive.
Later, more definitive testing was done. Not a single case of whooping cough was confirmed with the definitive test. Instead, it appears that the staff probably had ordinary respiratory diseases such as the common cold.
Of course, that leads to the question of why rely on them at all. “At face value, obviously they shouldn’t be doing it,” Dr. Perl said. But, she said, often when answers are needed and an organism like the pertussis bacterium is finicky and hard to grow in a laboratory, “you don’t have great options.”
Two things the Lord hates
are dishonest scales
and dishonest measures.
In 1986 as part of the NCVIA, HHS was required to submit bi-annual reports detailing actions taken to ensure vaccine safety. This was not done, forcing 78 million USA children into vaccine programs with no safety provisions.
Rx Only
No descriptive printed matter, advertising and promotional materials, relating to the use of your product may represent or suggest that this test is safe or effective for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.
The emergency use of this product is only authorized for the duration of the declaration that circumstances exist justifying the authorization of emergency use of in vitro diagnostics for detection and/or diagnosis of COVID-19 under Section 564(b)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb3(b)(1), unless the declaration is terminated or authorization is revoked sooner.
This EUA will be effective until the declaration that circumstances exist justifying the authorization of the emergency use of in vitro diagnostics for detection and/or diagnosis of COVID-19 is terminated under Section 564(b)(2) of the Act or the EUA is revoked under Section 564(g) of the Act.
When someone tests positive, contact tracers declare that anyone else with whom they have been in contact also becomes a COVID-19 case.
See text in image, which is a screen print of a social media post of unknown origin.
]]>Well, how about that! He actually admitted it. And yet important legal decisions are based on those tests.
The PCR tests were found to be false measures.
Two things the Lord hates
are dishonest scales
and dishonest measures.
If flu stats are significantly down, it may be because the COVID-19 test also detects the flu. A positive result of this test is more than likely recorded as COVID-19 when the person actually has the flu.
The PCR tests were found to be false measures.
Two things the Lord hates
are dishonest scales
and dishonest measures.
As of May 1, 2021, CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported vaccine breakthrough cases to focus on identifying and investigating only hospitalized or fatal cases…
The following is the new standard for testing breakthrough cases:
For cases with a known RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value, submit only specimens with Ct value ≤28 to CDC for sequencing. (Sequencing is not feasible with higher Ct values.)
Previously, if a positive signal wasn’t seen after 37 to 40 cycles, the test was negative. Each cycle increases the rate of a false positive. So what was done here is that they dialing down the rate of false positive for these breakthrough cases.
Are they still using the higher cycle thresholds for the non-vaccinated?
]]>
It’s interesting that these so-called authorities are using a test that can have its rate of positives dialed up or down as desired to support the narrative they want to push.